Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 30 września 2008 r. (sygn. akt K 44/07)

Sandra Mieczychowska
{"title":"Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 30 września 2008 r. (sygn. akt K 44/07)","authors":"Sandra Mieczychowska","doi":"10.4467/29567610pib.23.010.18293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The commentary approves the position of the Constitutional Tribunal expressed in the judgment of 30 September 2008 (Case K 44/07). The Constitutional Tribunal considered the application submitted by the First President of the Supreme Court, which concerned the scope of freedom of public administration authorities when they make decisions about destruction of a civil aircraft. The Constitutional Tribunal was tasked with adjudicating in this case if art. 122a act of „Prawo lotnicze” [Aviation law] is matched with art. 38, art. 31 ust. 3, art. 2, art. 26 and art. 30 of Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The decision of the judgment states that the provision of art. 122a of „Prawo lotnicze” is incompatible with the constitutional standard of protection of the right to life. Thus, the Constitutional Tribunal annulled the regulation allowing the Polish authorities to order the destruction of a passenger plane, which has been used for illegal activities, including those of a terrorist nature.","PeriodicalId":498152,"journal":{"name":"Prawo i Bezpieczeństwo","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prawo i Bezpieczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/29567610pib.23.010.18293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The commentary approves the position of the Constitutional Tribunal expressed in the judgment of 30 September 2008 (Case K 44/07). The Constitutional Tribunal considered the application submitted by the First President of the Supreme Court, which concerned the scope of freedom of public administration authorities when they make decisions about destruction of a civil aircraft. The Constitutional Tribunal was tasked with adjudicating in this case if art. 122a act of „Prawo lotnicze” [Aviation law] is matched with art. 38, art. 31 ust. 3, art. 2, art. 26 and art. 30 of Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The decision of the judgment states that the provision of art. 122a of „Prawo lotnicze” is incompatible with the constitutional standard of protection of the right to life. Thus, the Constitutional Tribunal annulled the regulation allowing the Polish authorities to order the destruction of a passenger plane, which has been used for illegal activities, including those of a terrorist nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法法庭 2008 年 9 月 30 日判决的词汇表。(第 K 44/07 号案件)
评注赞同宪法审裁处在2008年9月30日的判决(k44 /07案)中所表达的立场。宪法法庭审议了最高法院第一院长提出的申请,该申请涉及公共行政当局在作出关于摧毁民用飞机的决定时的自由范围。宪法法庭的任务是在这种情况下作出裁决。“Prawo lotnicze”[航空法]的一项法案与艺术相匹配。38岁的艺术。31科大。3、艺术。2、艺术。26和艺术。波兰共和国宪法第30条。判决书指出,art的规定。“Prawo lotnicze”第122a条不符合保护生命权的宪法标准。因此,宪法法庭取消了允许波兰当局下令摧毁一架客机的规定,这架客机曾被用于非法活动,包括恐怖主义性质的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aspekty prawa kanonicznego i prawa świeckiego w związku małżeńskim System zarządzania kryzysowego NATO a zagrożenia hybrydowe Sztuczna inteligencja a bezpieczeństwo państwa Sport jako element bezpieczeństwa społecznego Sztuczna inteligencja jako wyzwanie przyszłości
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1