Gluing Characteristics of Giant Bamboo Using Four Commercial Adhesives

Juanito Jimenez, James Edelbert Ramos
{"title":"Gluing Characteristics of Giant Bamboo Using Four Commercial Adhesives","authors":"Juanito Jimenez, James Edelbert Ramos","doi":"10.56899/152.05.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to determine the bonding performance of laminated giant bamboo[Dendrocalamus asper (Schult.) Backer] glued with four commercial adhesives (PVAc-D3, PUR, UF, PF) at different surface pairings (pith-pith, pith-skin, and skin-skin) and glue spread rates(100, 150, and 200 g/m2). Kiln-dried giant bamboo poles were ripsawn, planed, and cut to length to produce slats for lamination. Slats for surface roughness and wettability tests were sanded with 180-grit sandpaper on both skin and pith surfaces. Surface roughness of the skin and pith was measured using Mitutoyo SJ–210 Surftest unit, whereas wettability was determined via the sessile drop method. Giant bamboo slats were bonded using specific lamination parameters for each adhesive. Tensile shear tests at dry and wet conditions were performed on the laminates to determine bond strength. The results showed that the bamboo pith had a rougher texture than the skin but with insignificant contact angle differences. Moreover, PVAc-D3 and PUR gave the highest and lowest initial contact angles on both sides, respectively, with PUR maintaining the smallest values throughout the contact duration. Adhesive, surface pairing, and some interactions (adhesive x glue spread and adhesive x surface pairing) significantly affected the dry shear strength, whereas adhesive and adhesive x surface pairing influenced wet shear strength. PUR-bonded laminates had the highest dry shear strength, followed by PF, PVAc-D3, and UF. In terms of wet shear strength, only PVAc-D3 did not conform to the minimum glue bond strength requirement of more than 1 MPa and cohesive bamboo failure of at least 40% (PNS 2099:2015). Skin-skin and pith-pith surface pairing yielded the highest and lowest dry shear strengths, respectively. Increasing the amount of glue did not translate to a stronger bond. PUR, UF, and PF are feasible alternatives to PVAc-D3 in engineered bamboo production for various end-uses.","PeriodicalId":22801,"journal":{"name":"The Philippine journal of science","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philippine journal of science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56899/152.05.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the bonding performance of laminated giant bamboo[Dendrocalamus asper (Schult.) Backer] glued with four commercial adhesives (PVAc-D3, PUR, UF, PF) at different surface pairings (pith-pith, pith-skin, and skin-skin) and glue spread rates(100, 150, and 200 g/m2). Kiln-dried giant bamboo poles were ripsawn, planed, and cut to length to produce slats for lamination. Slats for surface roughness and wettability tests were sanded with 180-grit sandpaper on both skin and pith surfaces. Surface roughness of the skin and pith was measured using Mitutoyo SJ–210 Surftest unit, whereas wettability was determined via the sessile drop method. Giant bamboo slats were bonded using specific lamination parameters for each adhesive. Tensile shear tests at dry and wet conditions were performed on the laminates to determine bond strength. The results showed that the bamboo pith had a rougher texture than the skin but with insignificant contact angle differences. Moreover, PVAc-D3 and PUR gave the highest and lowest initial contact angles on both sides, respectively, with PUR maintaining the smallest values throughout the contact duration. Adhesive, surface pairing, and some interactions (adhesive x glue spread and adhesive x surface pairing) significantly affected the dry shear strength, whereas adhesive and adhesive x surface pairing influenced wet shear strength. PUR-bonded laminates had the highest dry shear strength, followed by PF, PVAc-D3, and UF. In terms of wet shear strength, only PVAc-D3 did not conform to the minimum glue bond strength requirement of more than 1 MPa and cohesive bamboo failure of at least 40% (PNS 2099:2015). Skin-skin and pith-pith surface pairing yielded the highest and lowest dry shear strengths, respectively. Increasing the amount of glue did not translate to a stronger bond. PUR, UF, and PF are feasible alternatives to PVAc-D3 in engineered bamboo production for various end-uses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种商用胶黏剂对巨竹胶黏特性的影响
本研究旨在确定层压巨型竹的粘结性能[Dendrocalamus asper (Schult.)]。用四种商用粘合剂(PVAc-D3, PUR, UF, PF)以不同的表面配对(髓-髓,髓-皮和皮-皮)和胶水涂抹率(100,150和200 g/m2)粘合。经过窑干的巨大竹竿被锯、刨、切成一定长度,制成板条用于层压。板条表面粗糙度和润湿性测试用180砂纸在板条表皮和板条髓表面进行打磨。皮肤和髓的表面粗糙度采用Mitutoyo SJ-210 Surftest装置测量,而润湿性则采用固定式滴法测定。巨型竹板条使用特定的层压参数粘合每种粘合剂。在干湿条件下对层压板进行了拉伸剪切试验,以确定粘结强度。结果表明,竹髓的纹理比皮粗糙,但接触角差异不显著。此外,PVAc-D3和PUR在两侧的初始接触角分别最高和最低,PUR在整个接触时间内保持最小值。胶粘剂、表面配对和某些相互作用(胶粘剂x涂胶和胶粘剂x表面配对)显著影响干抗剪强度,而胶粘剂和胶粘剂x表面配对影响湿抗剪强度。pur粘结层合板的干抗剪强度最高,其次是PF、PVAc-D3和UF。湿抗剪强度方面,只有PVAc-D3不符合PNS 2099:2015要求的最小胶接强度大于1 MPa和粘聚竹破坏不低于40%的要求。皮-皮和髓-髓表面配对分别产生最高和最低的干剪切强度。增加胶水的量并不能使粘合更牢固。在各种最终用途的工程竹生产中,PUR、UF和PF是PVAc-D3的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection of Outliers in Univariate Circular Data Using New Cut-off Points for the Circular Distance Field Observations of Same-sex Non-reproductive Mounts in Adult Male Philippine Long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) Distribution, Accumulation, and Risk Assessment of Pb and Cd in the Tea Plant Leaves, Black Tea, and Soil from Different Tea Plantations in Lahijan, Iran Internet of Things Enabled Smart Water Excellence Observing and Outflow Recognition System Exhaustive Review on Nail Lacquer in the Treatment of Nail Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1