Abdul Kareem Muhammad Al-Shammaa, Ghusoon Sadiq Al-Qaisee, Bashar Rasheed Al-Hamami
{"title":"Advantages of Using Inverted T-Sections to Construct Cantilever RC Beams","authors":"Abdul Kareem Muhammad Al-Shammaa, Ghusoon Sadiq Al-Qaisee, Bashar Rasheed Al-Hamami","doi":"10.15866/irece.v14i4.23337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to find a simple, fast, and economical method for designing RC cantilever beams instead of the traditional methods. Generally, the concrete beams have been designed as T-sections so that their flange has failed within the compression zone, which has embedded with reinforced concrete slab. The structural engineer can select the appropriate section for each span length, but the trial and error method may be used with more effort and time. The economic selection has been become more difficult for cantilever beams especially with a large span due to the significant deflections they have been exposed to. In order to solve this problem, a current theoretical study has been conducted on a number of locally common dropped and inverted T-sections for cantilever RC beams that reinforced with a different reinforcement ratios and their sustained and immediate deflections have been checked according to the ACI -19 provisions. By creating an algorithm and using the Python 3.4 software, the allowable sections have been identified for each required span length. Three curves have been drawn to choose the optimum dimensions for both dropped and inverted T-sections easily. In addition, by comparison, it has been found out that the selection of inverted T-sections has more economy to provide longer spans than dropped sections.","PeriodicalId":37854,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Civil Engineering","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15866/irece.v14i4.23337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to find a simple, fast, and economical method for designing RC cantilever beams instead of the traditional methods. Generally, the concrete beams have been designed as T-sections so that their flange has failed within the compression zone, which has embedded with reinforced concrete slab. The structural engineer can select the appropriate section for each span length, but the trial and error method may be used with more effort and time. The economic selection has been become more difficult for cantilever beams especially with a large span due to the significant deflections they have been exposed to. In order to solve this problem, a current theoretical study has been conducted on a number of locally common dropped and inverted T-sections for cantilever RC beams that reinforced with a different reinforcement ratios and their sustained and immediate deflections have been checked according to the ACI -19 provisions. By creating an algorithm and using the Python 3.4 software, the allowable sections have been identified for each required span length. Three curves have been drawn to choose the optimum dimensions for both dropped and inverted T-sections easily. In addition, by comparison, it has been found out that the selection of inverted T-sections has more economy to provide longer spans than dropped sections.
期刊介绍:
The International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original theoretical papers, applied papers, review papers and case studies on all fields of civil engineering. The scope of the Journal encompasses, but is not restricted to the following areas: infrastructure engineering; transportation engineering; structural engineering (buildings innovative structures environmentally responsive structures bridges stadiums commercial and public buildings, transmission towers, television and telecommunication masts, cooling towers, plates and shells, suspension structures, smart structures, nuclear reactors, dams, pressure vessels, pipelines, tunnels and so on); earthquake, hazards, structural dynamics, risks and mitigation engineering; environmental engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; multi-scale analysis; constitutive modeling and experimental testing; construction materials; composite materials in engineering structures (use, theoretical analysis and fabrication techniques); novel computational modeling techniques; engineering economics. The Editorial policy is to maintain a reasonable balance between papers regarding different research areas so that the Journal will be useful to all interested scientific groups.