Treatment Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis: The Effect of Drug Administration Methods and Neuropsychiatric Comorbidities

Sena Destan Bunul
{"title":"Treatment Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis: The Effect of Drug Administration Methods and Neuropsychiatric Comorbidities","authors":"Sena Destan Bunul","doi":"10.14744/bmj.2023.43265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease affecting young adults. While disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) help manage and decelerate disease progression, adherence to these treatments is a significant challenge. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between treatment adherence and different drug administration methods in MS patients in the context of neuropsychiatric evaluations. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital of Neurology Clinic using the 2017 revised McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis. Demographic data, MS-related metrics, and DMDs were recorded. Participants were stratified based on their DMDs into oral, injectable, and infusion treatments. The MS Treatment Adherence Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were administered. Results: Of the 89 patients, treatment adherence was 45%. There were significant differences in side effect scores between the non-adherent and adherent groups for both oral and injectable DMDs. The Beck Depression Inventory average score was 12.49±9.81, while the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory average scores for STAI1 and STAI2 were 38.95±10.41 and 47.89±10.66, respectively. Significant differences were observed in disease duration, the average expanded disability status scale score, and the average STAI score. Conclusion: Adherence rates varied with the method of drug administration, with oral treatments having 34.4% adherence and injectable treatments having 53.4%. Factors like perceived efficacy, depression, and anxiety influenced treatment adherence. No significant correlations were found between demographic factors like age, gender, or education and adherence rates. Treatment adherence is crucial in managing MS. This study highlights the role of drug administration methods and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in influencing adherence. A comprehensive assessment considering these factors is vital in choosing an appropriate DMD for MS patients","PeriodicalId":34126,"journal":{"name":"Bogazici Tip Dergisi","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogazici Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bmj.2023.43265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease affecting young adults. While disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) help manage and decelerate disease progression, adherence to these treatments is a significant challenge. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between treatment adherence and different drug administration methods in MS patients in the context of neuropsychiatric evaluations. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital of Neurology Clinic using the 2017 revised McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis. Demographic data, MS-related metrics, and DMDs were recorded. Participants were stratified based on their DMDs into oral, injectable, and infusion treatments. The MS Treatment Adherence Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were administered. Results: Of the 89 patients, treatment adherence was 45%. There were significant differences in side effect scores between the non-adherent and adherent groups for both oral and injectable DMDs. The Beck Depression Inventory average score was 12.49±9.81, while the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory average scores for STAI1 and STAI2 were 38.95±10.41 and 47.89±10.66, respectively. Significant differences were observed in disease duration, the average expanded disability status scale score, and the average STAI score. Conclusion: Adherence rates varied with the method of drug administration, with oral treatments having 34.4% adherence and injectable treatments having 53.4%. Factors like perceived efficacy, depression, and anxiety influenced treatment adherence. No significant correlations were found between demographic factors like age, gender, or education and adherence rates. Treatment adherence is crucial in managing MS. This study highlights the role of drug administration methods and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in influencing adherence. A comprehensive assessment considering these factors is vital in choosing an appropriate DMD for MS patients
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症的治疗依从性:给药方法和神经精神合并症的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of clinical observation scales in determining mortality for cerebrovascular diseases The effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bone mineral density, bone formation/resorption markers and quality of life in premenopausal asthmatic women Vitreoretinal surgery procedures and results in a tertiary eye hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic and national quarantine period Depression and Sleep Quality in Restless Legs Syndrome/Willis-Ekbom Disease The Diagnosis of Gastric Bronchogenic Cyst with Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1