{"title":"Effect of public–private partnership projects on inequality in developing countries","authors":"Noemí Peña-Miguel, Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteros","doi":"10.1080/17487870.2023.2275039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of public–private partnerships (PPPs) on income inequality, focusing on economic infrastructures. For that, we use a sample composed of data from 38 low- and middle-income countries over the period 2000–2018. The empirical findings suggest that inequality has not been reduced; by contrast, income inequality has increased in countries that have developed PPP projects to a greater extent. This study offers practical implications about the social cost that the PPP formula has in developing countries.KEYWORDS: InequalityPPPPublic–Private Partnershipdeveloping countriesincome Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. For further information about gains, please, check Estache and Saussier (Citation2014).2. Further information: https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.3. Further information is described in more detail on the website: https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.4. Corruption is especially relevant in this case. It is highly correlated with many control variables, like inflation, economic growth, balance, openness, unemployment, and especially with the democratization index. In addition, according to Cuadrado-Ballesteros and Peña-Miguel (Citation2022), corruption (which would be an explanatory variable in our model) would be highly correlated with PPP variables (which are currently explanatory variables). Then, our model would have several multicollinearity problems if corruption had been included.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea [Consolidated Research Group EJ/GV: IT 897-16].","PeriodicalId":51737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2023.2275039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of public–private partnerships (PPPs) on income inequality, focusing on economic infrastructures. For that, we use a sample composed of data from 38 low- and middle-income countries over the period 2000–2018. The empirical findings suggest that inequality has not been reduced; by contrast, income inequality has increased in countries that have developed PPP projects to a greater extent. This study offers practical implications about the social cost that the PPP formula has in developing countries.KEYWORDS: InequalityPPPPublic–Private Partnershipdeveloping countriesincome Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. For further information about gains, please, check Estache and Saussier (Citation2014).2. Further information: https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.3. Further information is described in more detail on the website: https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.4. Corruption is especially relevant in this case. It is highly correlated with many control variables, like inflation, economic growth, balance, openness, unemployment, and especially with the democratization index. In addition, according to Cuadrado-Ballesteros and Peña-Miguel (Citation2022), corruption (which would be an explanatory variable in our model) would be highly correlated with PPP variables (which are currently explanatory variables). Then, our model would have several multicollinearity problems if corruption had been included.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea [Consolidated Research Group EJ/GV: IT 897-16].
摘要本研究考察了公私伙伴关系(ppp)对收入不平等的影响,重点关注经济基础设施。为此,我们使用了一个由2000年至2018年期间来自38个低收入和中等收入国家的数据组成的样本。实证结果表明,不平等并没有减少;相比之下,在发展PPP项目的国家,收入不平等在更大程度上加剧。本研究对PPP公式在发展中国家的社会成本提供了实际意义。关键词:不平等公私伙伴关系发展中国家收入披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。有关增益的进一步信息,请参阅Estache和Saussier (Citation2014)。更多信息:https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.3。更多详细信息请访问网站:https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppi.4。腐败在本案中尤为重要。它与许多控制变量高度相关,如通货膨胀、经济增长、平衡、开放、失业,特别是与民主化指数。此外,根据Cuadrado-Ballesteros和Peña-Miguel (Citation2022),腐败(这将是我们模型中的解释变量)将与PPP变量(目前是解释变量)高度相关。然后,我们的模型将有几个多重共线性问题,如果腐败已包括在内。本研究得到了Euskal Herriko大学的支持[Consolidated Research Group EJ/GV: IT 897-16]。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Policy Reform focuses on the analysis of economic policy reform. The journal draws upon what lessons can be learned from the successes and failures of countries undertaking reforms and how existing theories can be developed to shed light on positive as well as normative aspects of the reform process. The Journal of Economic Policy Reform encourages work from economists and political economy analysts on policies to promote growth and reduce poverty, intellectual property rights, aid versus trade, debt and debt relief, taxation and social security systems, surveys of key reform issues, as well as on corruption, democracy, emerging markets and the role of multilateral institutions.