Diverse Sexual Definitions and Their Predictors Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis in Hungary

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Sexuality Research and Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s13178-023-00902-3
Daniel Eörsi, David Major, Dorottya Arva, Luca Bikas, Norbert Nagy, Vince Fazekas-Pongor, Ferenc Horváth, András Terebessy
{"title":"Diverse Sexual Definitions and Their Predictors Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis in Hungary","authors":"Daniel Eörsi, David Major, Dorottya Arva, Luca Bikas, Norbert Nagy, Vince Fazekas-Pongor, Ferenc Horváth, András Terebessy","doi":"10.1007/s13178-023-00902-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Inconsistency of sexual definitions may lead to misunderstandings when evaluating research data or delivering health education. Diverse sexual definitions are especially common with unidirectional genital contacts (only one participant is involved with their genitals). Our aim was to analyze sexual definitions of adolescents and the role of age, gender, previous sexual experience, anxiety, and body image as possible determinants of unidirectional intimate behavior definitions. Methods Pooled cross-sectional survey data of 9th-grade Hungarian students ( n = 612, mean age = 16.1 years, range from 15 to 18 years) were used from the baseline assessment (conducted in 2019 and 2020) of the Balassagyarmat Health Education Program. Our questionnaire was based on the Sexual Definitions Survey. The associations of definition of manual and oral stimulation with gender, age, sexual experience, trait anxiety, and body image were further examined in a multilevel logistic regression model. Results The rating of different sexual behaviors as sex showed a hierarchy from kissing (10.3%) to vaginal intercourse (98.5%). Manual and oral stimulation was claimed to be sex by 73.4% and 84.3% of students. Girls (OR = 0.40; CI = 0.25–0.62) and older participants (OR = 0.75; CI = 0.59–0.96) were less likely to consider manual stimulation as sex. Conversely, previous sexual experience, anxiety, and body image were not significant predictors. Conclusions Our study is the first to investigate sexual definitions among non-English-speaking adolescents. It contributes to the understanding of ambiguity regarding the definitions of oral and manual stimulation in this specific age group. Policy implications As adolescents are the primary focus of sexual education, policies should take into consideration the semantic differences in sexual definitions, as these may influence the participants’ interpretation of information and have an effect on their sexual behavior.","PeriodicalId":47654,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","volume":"202 s683","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00902-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Inconsistency of sexual definitions may lead to misunderstandings when evaluating research data or delivering health education. Diverse sexual definitions are especially common with unidirectional genital contacts (only one participant is involved with their genitals). Our aim was to analyze sexual definitions of adolescents and the role of age, gender, previous sexual experience, anxiety, and body image as possible determinants of unidirectional intimate behavior definitions. Methods Pooled cross-sectional survey data of 9th-grade Hungarian students ( n = 612, mean age = 16.1 years, range from 15 to 18 years) were used from the baseline assessment (conducted in 2019 and 2020) of the Balassagyarmat Health Education Program. Our questionnaire was based on the Sexual Definitions Survey. The associations of definition of manual and oral stimulation with gender, age, sexual experience, trait anxiety, and body image were further examined in a multilevel logistic regression model. Results The rating of different sexual behaviors as sex showed a hierarchy from kissing (10.3%) to vaginal intercourse (98.5%). Manual and oral stimulation was claimed to be sex by 73.4% and 84.3% of students. Girls (OR = 0.40; CI = 0.25–0.62) and older participants (OR = 0.75; CI = 0.59–0.96) were less likely to consider manual stimulation as sex. Conversely, previous sexual experience, anxiety, and body image were not significant predictors. Conclusions Our study is the first to investigate sexual definitions among non-English-speaking adolescents. It contributes to the understanding of ambiguity regarding the definitions of oral and manual stimulation in this specific age group. Policy implications As adolescents are the primary focus of sexual education, policies should take into consideration the semantic differences in sexual definitions, as these may influence the participants’ interpretation of information and have an effect on their sexual behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年性别定义的多样性及其预测因素:匈牙利的多水平分析
性别定义的不一致可能导致在评估研究数据或提供健康教育时的误解。在单向生殖器接触(只有一个参与者与他们的生殖器接触)中,不同的性定义尤为常见。我们的目的是分析青少年的性定义,以及年龄、性别、以前的性经验、焦虑和身体形象作为单向亲密行为定义的可能决定因素的作用。方法采用Balassagyarmat健康教育项目(Balassagyarmat Health Education Program, Balassagyarmat)基线评估(2019年和2020年进行)中匈牙利九年级学生(n = 612,平均年龄16.1岁,15 - 18岁)的汇总横断面调查数据。我们的问卷是基于性定义调查。在多水平logistic回归模型中进一步检验手、口刺激的定义与性别、年龄、性经验、特质焦虑和身体形象的关系。结果不同的性行为被认为是性行为的程度从接吻(10.3%)到阴道性交(98.5%)不等。73.4%和84.3%的学生声称手和口的刺激是性行为。女孩(OR = 0.40;CI = 0.25-0.62)和年龄较大的参与者(OR = 0.75;CI = 0.59-0.96)不太可能将手动刺激视为性行为。相反,以前的性经历、焦虑和身体形象并不是显著的预测因子。结论:我们的研究首次调查了非英语国家青少年的性定义。它有助于理解关于口腔和手动刺激的定义在这个特定年龄组的模糊性。由于青少年是性教育的主要重点,政策应考虑到性定义的语义差异,因为这些差异可能影响参与者对信息的解释,并对他们的性行为产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Sexuality Research and Social Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Sexuality Research and Social Policy is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed state-of-the-art empirical research on sexuality, theoretical and methodological discussions, and the implications of this evidence for policies across the globe regarding sexual health, sexuality education, and sexual rights in diverse communities. The journal also publishes brief research and conference reports; white papers; book, film, and other reviews; together with guest editorials and commentaries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy occasionally publishes special issues on timely topics.
期刊最新文献
Let Us Educate on Pornography: Young Education Students’ Representations of Pornography News Media Representation of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review Older LGBT+ Adults and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Data Further Investigation on Sexual Abuse Experiences: Revisiting the Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Abuse History Questionnaire and the Content of its Open-Ended Item From “Bad” and “Good” Motivations to Abort to “Bad” and “Good” Women: Abortion Stigma and Backlash Against Women Who Interrupt Their Pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1