Performance of an Asymmetric Pit-in-Pit Excavation Supported by Diaphragm Wall and Multi Uplift Piles System in Coastal Areas

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Canadian Geotechnical Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1139/cgj-2023-0319
Ruisong Wang, Hongyuan Dong, Daoxu Shen, Jianfeng Li, Pengpeng Ni, Chenyang Zhao
{"title":"Performance of an Asymmetric Pit-in-Pit Excavation Supported by Diaphragm Wall and Multi Uplift Piles System in Coastal Areas","authors":"Ruisong Wang, Hongyuan Dong, Daoxu Shen, Jianfeng Li, Pengpeng Ni, Chenyang Zhao","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of asymmetric pit-in-pit excavation supported by diaphragm wall and multi uplift piles in coastal areas has been rarely reported. In this work, case study is conducted to investigate the mechanical characteristics of such excavation. A numerical model is established using the ABAQUS finite element platform, and its effectiveness is evaluated by comparing with the field monitoring data. After evaluation, the effects of uplift piles on excavation-induced deformations are investigated. Results show that the maximum wall deflections (δhm) are 0.02%~0.22% of the excavation depth (He), with the ground surface settlements of less than 0.6%·He and the settlement influence zone extending beyond 4He. As the soil is excavated, the top wall shows outward deformations to the active zone, and the transverse support is under tension. The use of combined diaphragm wall and multi uplift piles reduces the embedment ratio of diaphragm wall to a minimum value of 0.14, and decreases the δhm and rebound of base soil (δvrm) by 42% and 63%, respectively. A design suggestion is proposed for pile diameter (D), pile length (L) and pile spacing (S) to fall within the range of 0.4~0.8 m, 10~20 m and 6D~8D, respectively.","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of asymmetric pit-in-pit excavation supported by diaphragm wall and multi uplift piles in coastal areas has been rarely reported. In this work, case study is conducted to investigate the mechanical characteristics of such excavation. A numerical model is established using the ABAQUS finite element platform, and its effectiveness is evaluated by comparing with the field monitoring data. After evaluation, the effects of uplift piles on excavation-induced deformations are investigated. Results show that the maximum wall deflections (δhm) are 0.02%~0.22% of the excavation depth (He), with the ground surface settlements of less than 0.6%·He and the settlement influence zone extending beyond 4He. As the soil is excavated, the top wall shows outward deformations to the active zone, and the transverse support is under tension. The use of combined diaphragm wall and multi uplift piles reduces the embedment ratio of diaphragm wall to a minimum value of 0.14, and decreases the δhm and rebound of base soil (δvrm) by 42% and 63%, respectively. A design suggestion is proposed for pile diameter (D), pile length (L) and pile spacing (S) to fall within the range of 0.4~0.8 m, 10~20 m and 6D~8D, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿海地区连续墙-多抗拔桩体系非对称基坑支护性能分析
在沿海地区,连续墙加多桩抗拔支护的非对称坑中基坑的开挖性能报道较少。本文通过实例研究了此类开挖的力学特性。利用ABAQUS有限元平台建立了数值模型,并与现场监测数据进行对比,评价了模型的有效性。通过评价,研究了抗拔桩对基坑开挖变形的影响。结果表明:最大墙体挠度(δhm)为开挖深度(He)的0.02%~0.22%,地表沉降小于0.6%·He,沉降影响区扩展到4He以上;随着土体的开挖,顶墙向活动区外变形,横向支撑受到拉张作用。连续墙与多桩组合使用可将连续墙的埋深比降低至最小值0.14,基底土的δhm和回弹(δvrm)分别降低42%和63%。提出了桩径D、桩长L、桩间距S分别在0.4~0.8 m、10~20 m、6D~8D范围内的设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling. Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.
期刊最新文献
Estimating relative density from shallow depth CPTs in normally consolidated and overconsolidated siliceous sand Kinematic response of floating single piles in saturated and nearly-saturated soil to P-waves Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of natural soft clay by true triaxial tests Experimental study on the mechanical characteristics of NPR anchored rock under kilometer-deep buried high geostress conditions Evolution of structure and anisotropic shear stiffness of compacted loess during compression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1