Identifying untapped legal capacity to promote multi-level and cross-sectoral coordination of natural resource governance

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s11625-023-01424-y
Nicola Harvey, Ahjond Garmestani, Craig R. Allen, Anoeska Buijze, Marleen van Rijswick
{"title":"Identifying untapped legal capacity to promote multi-level and cross-sectoral coordination of natural resource governance","authors":"Nicola Harvey, Ahjond Garmestani, Craig R. Allen, Anoeska Buijze, Marleen van Rijswick","doi":"10.1007/s11625-023-01424-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Natural resource governance in the face of climate change represents one of the seminal challenges of the Anthropocene. A number of innovative approaches have been developed in, among others, the fields of ecology, governance, and sustainability sciences for managing uncertainty and scarcity through a coordinated approach to natural resource governance. However, the absence of an enabling legal and regulatory framework has been identified in the literature as one of the primary barriers constraining the formal operationalization of these governance approaches. In this paper, we show how these approaches provide tools for analyzing procedural mandates across governmental levels and sectors in the natural resource governance space. We also find that there has been inadequate consideration of the potential in existing laws and regulations for cross-sectoral and multi-level coordination of natural resource governance. On this basis, we develop and apply a protocol that draws on the traditional legal method of doctrinal analysis to demonstrate how to identify existing, untapped legal capacity to promote coordinated governance of natural resources through an in-depth case study of water resources in South Africa. We then show how these untapped capacities within existing legal structures may be operationalized to improve natural resource governance. Further, this protocol is portable to other countries, provinces (states), and localities around the world.","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01424-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Natural resource governance in the face of climate change represents one of the seminal challenges of the Anthropocene. A number of innovative approaches have been developed in, among others, the fields of ecology, governance, and sustainability sciences for managing uncertainty and scarcity through a coordinated approach to natural resource governance. However, the absence of an enabling legal and regulatory framework has been identified in the literature as one of the primary barriers constraining the formal operationalization of these governance approaches. In this paper, we show how these approaches provide tools for analyzing procedural mandates across governmental levels and sectors in the natural resource governance space. We also find that there has been inadequate consideration of the potential in existing laws and regulations for cross-sectoral and multi-level coordination of natural resource governance. On this basis, we develop and apply a protocol that draws on the traditional legal method of doctrinal analysis to demonstrate how to identify existing, untapped legal capacity to promote coordinated governance of natural resources through an in-depth case study of water resources in South Africa. We then show how these untapped capacities within existing legal structures may be operationalized to improve natural resource governance. Further, this protocol is portable to other countries, provinces (states), and localities around the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定尚未开发的法律能力,以促进自然资源治理的多层次和跨部门协调
面对气候变化的自然资源治理是人类世的重大挑战之一。在生态、治理和可持续性科学等领域,已经开发了许多创新方法,通过协调自然资源治理的方法来管理不确定性和稀缺性。然而,在文献中,缺乏一个有利的法律和管理框架已被确定为限制这些治理方法正式运作的主要障碍之一。在本文中,我们展示了这些方法如何为分析自然资源治理领域中跨政府层面和部门的程序性授权提供工具。我们还发现,现有法律法规对跨部门、多层次协调自然资源治理的潜力考虑不足。在此基础上,我们开发并应用了一项协议,该协议借鉴了传统的理论分析法律方法,通过对南非水资源的深入案例研究,展示了如何识别现有的、尚未开发的法律能力,以促进自然资源的协调治理。然后,我们展示了如何在现有法律结构中利用这些未开发的能力来改善自然资源治理。此外,该协议可移植到世界各地的其他国家、省(州)和地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Mountain research for sustainability: where are we and where to go? Sufficiency policy: a definition, conceptual framework, and application to municipalities Regional agroecological stewardship: a framework to analyze the (re)territorialization of sustainable food systems Knowledge based interventions for sustainable development cooperation: insights from knowledge systems mapping in Zambia Bridging the nature–cultural heritage gap: evaluating sustainable entanglements through cemeteries in urban Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1