Enterprise architecture requirements for standardising digital health in Uganda's health system

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100805
Joseph Wamema, Andrew Alunyu, Mercy Amiyo, Josephine Nabukenya
{"title":"Enterprise architecture requirements for standardising digital health in Uganda's health system","authors":"Joseph Wamema,&nbsp;Andrew Alunyu,&nbsp;Mercy Amiyo,&nbsp;Josephine Nabukenya","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This research aimed to develop and validate enterprise architecture (EA) requirements to standardise digital health (DH) in Uganda's health system. These requirements were generated from DH challenges identified in an earlier prerequisite empirical study that was conducted to explore the feasibility of contextualising existing international DH standards to improve data use in Uganda's health system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study followed a cross-sectional research design, with the HIV/AIDS and TB disease model as a case study. A walkthrough approach was adopted to validate the derived requirements using purposively selected participants at national and sub-national levels of Uganda's healthcare system. Questionnaires (Google forms) were used to collect validation responses, while quantitative data was analysed using MS Excel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that the respondents agreed with the DH EA requirements for standardising Uganda's health system. The results represent views from 65.67% of the expected participants drawn from all Uganda's DH stakeholders. Although a few respondents (3.3%) did not agree, most (96.7%) agreed with the requirements as-is. Therefore, the derived EA requirements are deemed suitable for standardising and strengthening Uganda's DH system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Proper implementation of the EA requirements is expected to produce efficient, cost-effective, quality and safe digital health initiatives for Uganda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"12 4","pages":"Article 100805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000813/pdfft?md5=e4f3bbf9ff41a0c638ac504cc2c6c1d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883723000813-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This research aimed to develop and validate enterprise architecture (EA) requirements to standardise digital health (DH) in Uganda's health system. These requirements were generated from DH challenges identified in an earlier prerequisite empirical study that was conducted to explore the feasibility of contextualising existing international DH standards to improve data use in Uganda's health system.

Methods

The study followed a cross-sectional research design, with the HIV/AIDS and TB disease model as a case study. A walkthrough approach was adopted to validate the derived requirements using purposively selected participants at national and sub-national levels of Uganda's healthcare system. Questionnaires (Google forms) were used to collect validation responses, while quantitative data was analysed using MS Excel.

Results

The results show that the respondents agreed with the DH EA requirements for standardising Uganda's health system. The results represent views from 65.67% of the expected participants drawn from all Uganda's DH stakeholders. Although a few respondents (3.3%) did not agree, most (96.7%) agreed with the requirements as-is. Therefore, the derived EA requirements are deemed suitable for standardising and strengthening Uganda's DH system.

Conclusion

Proper implementation of the EA requirements is expected to produce efficient, cost-effective, quality and safe digital health initiatives for Uganda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达卫生系统中数字健康标准化的企业架构要求
本研究旨在开发和验证企业架构(EA)要求,以标准化乌干达卫生系统中的数字健康(DH)。这些要求是由早期的先决经验研究中确定的卫生挑战产生的,该研究旨在探索将现有的国际卫生标准结合起来以改善乌干达卫生系统数据使用的可行性。该研究采用了横断面研究设计,以艾滋病毒/艾滋病和结核病模型为案例研究。采用了一种演练方法,通过有目的地选择乌干达国家和国家以下各级医疗保健系统的参与者来验证派生的要求。问卷(google表格)收集验证性回复,定量数据使用MS Excel进行分析。结果表明,受访者同意卫生机构对乌干达卫生系统标准化的要求。结果代表了来自乌干达所有卫生保健利益相关者的65.67%的预期参与者的观点。虽然少数受访者(3.3%)不同意,但大多数(96.7%)同意现有的要求。因此,推导出的EA要求被认为适合于标准化和加强乌干达的卫生系统。预期适当执行环境评估的要求将为乌干达产生高效、具有成本效益、高质量和安全的数字保健举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1