Heritagising the South China Sea: appropriation and dispossession of maritime heritage through museums and exhibitions in Southern China

IF 2 1区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Heritage Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1080/13527258.2023.2263755
Edyta Roszko
{"title":"Heritagising the South China Sea: appropriation and dispossession of maritime heritage through museums and exhibitions in Southern China","authors":"Edyta Roszko","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2023.2263755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the emergence of critical heritage studies, scholars show that ‘bottom up’ initiatives that blur the boundaries between private, civil, and state have arisen not as a modernising vision to legitimise national authority but as ‘rooted in identification with local community’, linking past and future. In China, such studies demonstrate the emergence of a different kind of museology – with ‘private’ heritage initiatives on behalf of individuals and groups – tolerated by the state authorities through investments that link heritage tourism to development. However, when a maritime vision of national history is at stake, the central state would co-opt ‘private’ heritage initiatives to subsume them under the wider, sanitised narrative of Chinese maritime civilisation that requires a different relation to the past and its extraction from the localities that do not inscribe their heritage into these universalised visions. Zooming in on three museums in Hainan related to the South China Sea (SCS), I reveal the contradictory claims made by different actors regarding the use, representation and ownership claims of historical seafaring in terms of cultural heritage. Therefore, I argue that heritagisation of seafaring in the SCS represent proprietary and thus territorial claims for China’s rhetoric of maritime ecological civilisation.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2263755","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the emergence of critical heritage studies, scholars show that ‘bottom up’ initiatives that blur the boundaries between private, civil, and state have arisen not as a modernising vision to legitimise national authority but as ‘rooted in identification with local community’, linking past and future. In China, such studies demonstrate the emergence of a different kind of museology – with ‘private’ heritage initiatives on behalf of individuals and groups – tolerated by the state authorities through investments that link heritage tourism to development. However, when a maritime vision of national history is at stake, the central state would co-opt ‘private’ heritage initiatives to subsume them under the wider, sanitised narrative of Chinese maritime civilisation that requires a different relation to the past and its extraction from the localities that do not inscribe their heritage into these universalised visions. Zooming in on three museums in Hainan related to the South China Sea (SCS), I reveal the contradictory claims made by different actors regarding the use, representation and ownership claims of historical seafaring in terms of cultural heritage. Therefore, I argue that heritagisation of seafaring in the SCS represent proprietary and thus territorial claims for China’s rhetoric of maritime ecological civilisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南海遗产化:中国南方博物馆与展览对海洋遗产的占有与剥夺
随着批判性遗产研究的出现,学者们表明,模糊私人、公民和国家之间界限的“自下而上”倡议的出现,不是作为一种使国家权威合法化的现代化愿景,而是“植根于对当地社区的认同”,将过去和未来联系起来。在中国,这些研究表明了一种不同类型的博物馆学的出现——代表个人和团体的“私人”遗产倡议——通过将遗产旅游与发展联系起来的投资,得到了国家当局的容忍。然而,当国家历史的海洋愿景受到威胁时,中央政府会采取“私人”遗产倡议,将它们纳入更广泛的、净化过的中国海洋文明叙事之下,这需要与过去建立不同的关系,并从没有将其遗产纳入这些普遍愿景的地方提取。通过对海南三个与南海有关的博物馆的放大,我揭示了不同行为者对历史航海文化遗产的使用、表现和所有权主张的矛盾主张。因此,我认为,南海的航海遗产代表了中国海洋生态文明言论的所有权和领土主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.
期刊最新文献
‘The spirit will be here, and hopefully the music too’ perceptions of the future of culture and heritage in the context of climate change on Fanø A multidimensional framework for assessing cultural heritage vulnerability to flood hazards The Australian orphanage museum: heritage and activism Local Australian memory activism and the fast and slow violence of institutional abuse Closing the cell door: where are the Histories of Care-leavers at the old Melbourne Gaol?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1