Children’s rights in Bulgaria between theory and practice: The case of the deinstitutionalization reform

Q3 Arts and Humanities Intersections Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI:10.17356/ieejsp.v9i2.1126
Gergana Nenova, Radostina Antonova
{"title":"Children’s rights in Bulgaria between theory and practice: The case of the deinstitutionalization reform","authors":"Gergana Nenova, Radostina Antonova","doi":"10.17356/ieejsp.v9i2.1126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like many post-socialist states, following the transition to democracy, Bulgaria had to close the large institutions for children in which orphans, children with disabilities and other types of children were being raised. The so-called deinstitutionalization reform has been an important part of introducing children’s rights legislation in contemporary Bulgaria. However, it is still unclear how the consequences of the reform relate to the normative framework of child’s rights. To address this problem, we present the results of a study conducted in 2020/2021 that explores the implementation of the reform through the approach of action research. We analyse interviews with children, social workers and public officials conducted in two big cities in Bulgaria. We outline the ways and extent to which children’s rights are integrated into the professional practice of social workers and in the lives of children that are part of the reform, as well as the reasons for their violation. We conclude that there are significant contradictions between the ‘theoretical framework’ of children’s rights and their implementation in relation to the deinstitutionalization reform. The former may be seen as ‘unintended consequences’ of the reform resulting from Bulgarian society’s socio-cultural specificities.","PeriodicalId":31153,"journal":{"name":"Intersections","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v9i2.1126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like many post-socialist states, following the transition to democracy, Bulgaria had to close the large institutions for children in which orphans, children with disabilities and other types of children were being raised. The so-called deinstitutionalization reform has been an important part of introducing children’s rights legislation in contemporary Bulgaria. However, it is still unclear how the consequences of the reform relate to the normative framework of child’s rights. To address this problem, we present the results of a study conducted in 2020/2021 that explores the implementation of the reform through the approach of action research. We analyse interviews with children, social workers and public officials conducted in two big cities in Bulgaria. We outline the ways and extent to which children’s rights are integrated into the professional practice of social workers and in the lives of children that are part of the reform, as well as the reasons for their violation. We conclude that there are significant contradictions between the ‘theoretical framework’ of children’s rights and their implementation in relation to the deinstitutionalization reform. The former may be seen as ‘unintended consequences’ of the reform resulting from Bulgarian society’s socio-cultural specificities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保加利亚儿童权利的理论与实践:以去机构化改革为例
象许多后社会主义国家一样,在向民主过渡之后,保加利亚不得不关闭那些养育孤儿、残疾儿童和其他类型儿童的大型儿童机构。所谓的去机构化改革是在当代保加利亚推行儿童权利立法的一个重要组成部分。然而,尚不清楚改革的后果如何与儿童权利的规范框架有关。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了2020/2021年进行的一项研究的结果,该研究通过行动研究的方法探讨了改革的实施情况。我们分析了在保加利亚两个大城市对儿童、社会工作者和政府官员进行的采访。我们概述了将儿童权利纳入社会工作者的专业实践和作为改革一部分的儿童生活的方式和程度,以及侵犯儿童权利的原因。我们得出结论,儿童权利的“理论框架”与其在去机构化改革中的实施之间存在重大矛盾。前者可能被视为保加利亚社会的社会文化特殊性所导致的改革的“意外后果”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intersections
Intersections Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Intersections is a peer-reviewed series on interdisciplinary topics in early modern studies. Contributions may come from any of the disciplines within the humanities, such as history, art history, literary history, book history, church history, social history, cultural history, and history of ideas. Each volume focuses on a single theme and consists of essays that explore new perspectives on the subject of study. The series aims to open up new areas of research on early modern culture and to address issues of interest to a wide range of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Creative and participatory methods for bolstering violence prevention in schools in South East Europe through shifting social and gender norms Impact on child justice in a world of digital courts: Perspectives from the bench Locating the role of civil society in anti-corruption: A qualitative comparative analysis of 30 democracies How green are children’s rights institutions in the Visegrád countries? New questions about children’s rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1