Exploration of Clinical Characteristics and Drug Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Complicated with Autoimmune Diseases

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.32629/jcmr.v4i3.1260
Jiawei Guo
{"title":"Exploration of Clinical Characteristics and Drug Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Complicated with Autoimmune Diseases","authors":"Jiawei Guo","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v4i3.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and drug treatment outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) complicated with autoimmune diseases. Methods: A total of 200 patients with IBD and autoimmune diseases were selected as the observation group from January 2022 to June 2023. In addition, 200 patients with simple IBD during the same period were selected as the control group. The general and clinical data of the two groups of patients were collected and analyzed to compare their clinical characteristics and drug treatment outcomes. Results: ① There were no significant differences in gender, age, lesion location, and clinical type between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the two groups differed significantly in terms of disease duration, severity of the condition, and extraintestinal symptoms (P < 0.05). ② There was no significant difference in the use of microbial preparations between the two groups (P > 0.05). The observation group had a higher usage rate of steroids compared to the control group, while the usage rate of aminosalicylate suppositories was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). ③ There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with IBD complicated by autoimmune diseases have longer disease duration, more severe conditions, and more extraintestinal symptoms compared to those with simple IBD. The usage rate of steroids is higher, while the usage rate of aminosalicylate suppositories is lower in the treatment plan for the former group. Nevertheless, the overall effectiveness is comparable to that of patients with simple IBD, and the overall prognosis is relatively favorable.","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v4i3.1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and drug treatment outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) complicated with autoimmune diseases. Methods: A total of 200 patients with IBD and autoimmune diseases were selected as the observation group from January 2022 to June 2023. In addition, 200 patients with simple IBD during the same period were selected as the control group. The general and clinical data of the two groups of patients were collected and analyzed to compare their clinical characteristics and drug treatment outcomes. Results: ① There were no significant differences in gender, age, lesion location, and clinical type between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the two groups differed significantly in terms of disease duration, severity of the condition, and extraintestinal symptoms (P < 0.05). ② There was no significant difference in the use of microbial preparations between the two groups (P > 0.05). The observation group had a higher usage rate of steroids compared to the control group, while the usage rate of aminosalicylate suppositories was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). ③ There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with IBD complicated by autoimmune diseases have longer disease duration, more severe conditions, and more extraintestinal symptoms compared to those with simple IBD. The usage rate of steroids is higher, while the usage rate of aminosalicylate suppositories is lower in the treatment plan for the former group. Nevertheless, the overall effectiveness is comparable to that of patients with simple IBD, and the overall prognosis is relatively favorable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎性肠病合并自身免疫性疾病的临床特点及药物治疗探讨
目的:分析炎症性肠病(IBD)合并自身免疫性疾病的临床特点及药物治疗效果。方法:选择2022年1月~ 2023年6月IBD合并自身免疫性疾病患者200例作为观察组。同时选取同期单纯性IBD患者200例作为对照组。收集两组患者的一般资料和临床资料进行分析,比较两组患者的临床特点和药物治疗效果。结果:①两组患者在性别、年龄、病变部位、临床分型等方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。然而,两组在疾病持续时间、病情严重程度和肠外症状方面存在显著差异(P <0.05)。②两组在微生物制剂的使用上无显著差异(P >0.05)。观察组患者类固醇使用率高于对照组,而氨基水杨酸栓使用率低于对照组(P <0.05)。③两组患者治疗疗效差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论:与单纯IBD患者相比,IBD合并自身免疫性疾病患者病程更长,病情更严重,肠外症状更多。前者治疗方案中类固醇使用率较高,而氨基水杨酸栓使用率较低。然而,总体疗效与单纯性IBD患者相当,总体预后相对良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Blood Glucose After Starch Loading in Young Women With Small Increase in Salivary Amylase: Another Crucial Role of Postprandial Salivary Amylase. The Effects of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Cancer Antigen 15-3 and Cancer Antigen 125 on the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients With Different Molecular Subtypes. Addition of Sacubitril/Valsartan to Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Primary Aldosteronism: Effects on Plasma Aldosterone Concentration and Plasma Renin Activity. Assessing the Impact of Serum Calcium, 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D, Ferritin, and Uric Acid Levels on Colorectal Cancer Risk. Bridging Three Years of Insights: Examining the Association Between Depression and Gallstone Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1