A probiotic amylase blend reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in a randomised clinical study

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Beneficial microbes Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1163/18762891-20230043
M.B. La Monica, B. Raub, H.L. Lopez, T.N. Ziegenfuss
{"title":"A probiotic amylase blend reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in a randomised clinical study","authors":"M.B. La Monica, B. Raub, H.L. Lopez, T.N. Ziegenfuss","doi":"10.1163/18762891-20230043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical study was performed to examine the effects of a probiotic- amylase (PRO) blend on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Sixty men and women (44.4 ± 8.9 yr; 82.0 ± 18.4 kg; 170.3 ± 11.5 cm; 28.1 ± 4.6 kg/m 2 ) were randomised into PRO (n = 29) or placebo (PLA: n = 31) groups. Participants exhibited mild to moderate GI symptoms and severity [via Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)] to be eligible for participation. Participants were tested before (Baseline) and after (POST) 6 weeks of supplementation on various gastrointestinal indices, the GSRS (to assess GI symptoms, frequency, and severity), an anxiety questionnaire (GAD-7), and an overall well-being questionnaire (SF-36). Two (PRO vs PLA) × 2 (Baseline vs POST) mixed factorial ANOVAs were completed to assess group, time, and (group × time) interaction effects. Fifty-two subjects who completed the entire study were analysed (PRO: n = 25, PLA: n = 27). There were statistically significant ( ) interactions for bloating, GSRS score, and abdominal discomfort but time effects for flatulence, constipation, stool regularity, and GAD-7 total score. PRO significantly reduced GSRS score (∼60 vs 25%, d = 0.72), bloating (∼49% vs 25%, d = −0.63) and abdominal discomfort (59% vs 32%, d = −0.66) to a greater degree than PLA. PRO significantly reduced subjective feelings of irritability, pain, and overall health interference. Oral supplementation of the probiotic-amylase blend was very well tolerated. Our study showed that the probiotic-amylase blend reduced the GSRS score and other GI symptoms to a greater degree than PLA. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov #NCT05614726","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-20230043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical study was performed to examine the effects of a probiotic- amylase (PRO) blend on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Sixty men and women (44.4 ± 8.9 yr; 82.0 ± 18.4 kg; 170.3 ± 11.5 cm; 28.1 ± 4.6 kg/m 2 ) were randomised into PRO (n = 29) or placebo (PLA: n = 31) groups. Participants exhibited mild to moderate GI symptoms and severity [via Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)] to be eligible for participation. Participants were tested before (Baseline) and after (POST) 6 weeks of supplementation on various gastrointestinal indices, the GSRS (to assess GI symptoms, frequency, and severity), an anxiety questionnaire (GAD-7), and an overall well-being questionnaire (SF-36). Two (PRO vs PLA) × 2 (Baseline vs POST) mixed factorial ANOVAs were completed to assess group, time, and (group × time) interaction effects. Fifty-two subjects who completed the entire study were analysed (PRO: n = 25, PLA: n = 27). There were statistically significant ( ) interactions for bloating, GSRS score, and abdominal discomfort but time effects for flatulence, constipation, stool regularity, and GAD-7 total score. PRO significantly reduced GSRS score (∼60 vs 25%, d = 0.72), bloating (∼49% vs 25%, d = −0.63) and abdominal discomfort (59% vs 32%, d = −0.66) to a greater degree than PLA. PRO significantly reduced subjective feelings of irritability, pain, and overall health interference. Oral supplementation of the probiotic-amylase blend was very well tolerated. Our study showed that the probiotic-amylase blend reduced the GSRS score and other GI symptoms to a greater degree than PLA. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov #NCT05614726
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项随机临床研究中,一种益生菌淀粉酶混合物可减轻胃肠道症状
摘要:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行临床研究旨在研究益生菌-淀粉酶(PRO)混合物对胃肠道(GI)症状的影响。男女60名(44.4±8.9岁);82.0±18.4 kg;170.3±11.5 cm;28.1±4.6 kg/ m2)随机分为PRO组(n = 29)和安慰剂组(PLA: n = 31)。参与者表现出轻度至中度胃肠道症状和严重程度[通过胃肠道症状评定量表(GSRS)]才有资格参加。在补充6周之前(基线)和之后(POST)对参与者进行各种胃肠指数、GSRS(用于评估胃肠道症状、频率和严重程度)、焦虑问卷(GAD-7)和整体幸福感问卷(SF-36)的测试。完成2个(PRO vs PLA) x2(基线vs POST)混合因子方差分析来评估组、时间和(组×时间)相互作用效应。对完成整个研究的52名受试者进行分析(PRO: n = 25, PLA: n = 27)。胀气、GSRS评分和腹部不适之间存在统计学显著的相互作用,但胀气、便秘、大便规律性和GAD-7总分之间存在时间效应。与PLA相比,PRO显著降低GSRS评分(~ 60 vs 25%, d = 0.72)、腹胀(~ 49% vs 25%, d = - 0.63)和腹部不适(59% vs 32%, d = - 0.66)。PRO显著降低了烦躁、疼痛和整体健康干扰的主观感觉。口服补充益生菌-淀粉酶混合物的耐受性非常好。我们的研究表明,与PLA相比,益生菌-淀粉酶混合物在更大程度上降低了GSRS评分和其他胃肠道症状。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov #NCT05614726
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
期刊最新文献
Limosilactobacillus reuteri ameliorates maternal separation stress in newborn mice and alters subsequent adult behaviour. Aerobic bacterial group as an early-stage biomarker from faecal samples of patients with colorectal cancer without distant metastasis. Effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in neonates exposed to antibiotics: a randomised controlled trial. In vitro validation of colon delivery of vitamin B2 through a food grade multi-unit particle system. Oral supplementation of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis strain EC-12 relieves gastrointestinal discomfort and alters the gut microecology in academically stressed students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1