Testing for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry between trading volume and price returns in the futures markets of agricultural commodities: a discussion on the financial implications

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Studies in Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1108/sef-03-2023-0138
Dimitrios Panagiotou, Konstantinos Karamanis
{"title":"Testing for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry between trading volume and price returns in the futures markets of agricultural commodities: a discussion on the financial implications","authors":"Dimitrios Panagiotou, Konstantinos Karamanis","doi":"10.1108/sef-03-2023-0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry for the price volatility–trading volume relationship in the futures markets of agricultural commodities. Design/methodology/approach Empirical findings are produced with the use of a highly flexible, nonparametric approach. Data are daily prices and volumes from the commodities of corn, hard red wheat, oats, rice and soybeans. Findings Results reveal violations of monotonicity locally but not globally. Volume and price volatility have, in all markets, a nonlinear relationship to each other, indicating that the strength of the relationship does not remain constant over the entire joint distribution. Global symmetry is rejected for the markets of oats and hard red wheat but cannot be rejected for the remaining three markets. The latter suggests that large values of good volatility are likely to occur together with high trading volumes, as do large values of bad volatility in these markets. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical work to test simultaneously for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry between price volatility and trading volume in the futures markets of agricultural commodities.","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-03-2023-0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry for the price volatility–trading volume relationship in the futures markets of agricultural commodities. Design/methodology/approach Empirical findings are produced with the use of a highly flexible, nonparametric approach. Data are daily prices and volumes from the commodities of corn, hard red wheat, oats, rice and soybeans. Findings Results reveal violations of monotonicity locally but not globally. Volume and price volatility have, in all markets, a nonlinear relationship to each other, indicating that the strength of the relationship does not remain constant over the entire joint distribution. Global symmetry is rejected for the markets of oats and hard red wheat but cannot be rejected for the remaining three markets. The latter suggests that large values of good volatility are likely to occur together with high trading volumes, as do large values of bad volatility in these markets. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical work to test simultaneously for monotonicity, linearity and symmetry between price volatility and trading volume in the futures markets of agricultural commodities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农产品期货市场交易量和价格收益的单调性、线性和对称性检验:对金融影响的讨论
摘要目的探讨农产品期货市场价格波动与交易量关系的单调性、线性性和对称性。设计/方法/方法使用高度灵活的非参数方法产生实证结果。数据包括玉米、硬红小麦、燕麦、大米和大豆等大宗商品的每日价格和成交量。结果揭示了局部而非全局单调性的违反。在所有市场中,成交量和价格波动彼此之间都是非线性关系,这表明这种关系的强度在整个联合分布中并不保持不变。燕麦和硬红小麦市场的全局对称性被否定,但其余三个市场的全局对称性不能被否定。后者表明,在这些市场中,良好波动性的大值可能与高交易量同时出现,而不良波动性的大值也可能出现。据作者所知,这是第一次同时检验农产品期货市场价格波动与交易量之间的单调性、线性和对称性的实证工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling exogenous shocks, financial stress and US economic performance Influence of Ukrainian refugees on the exchange rate and stock market in neighboring countries How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach The ups and downs of oil prices: asymmetric impacts of oil price volatility on corporate environmental responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1