A framework to support teacher noticing of students' mathematical thinking in technology‐mediated environments

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Science and Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1111/ssm.12601
Allison W. McCulloch, Lara K. Dick, Jennifer N. Lovett
{"title":"A framework to support teacher noticing of students' mathematical thinking in <scp>technology‐mediated</scp> environments","authors":"Allison W. McCulloch, Lara K. Dick, Jennifer N. Lovett","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The practice of teacher noticing students' mathematical thinking often includes three interrelated components: attending to students' strategies, interpreting students' understandings, and deciding how to respond on the basis of students' understanding. This practice gains complexity in technology‐mediated environments (i.e., using technology‐enhanced math tasks) because it requires attending to and interpreting students' engagement with technology. Current frameworks implicitly assume the practice includes noticing the ways students use tools (including technology tools) in their work, but do not explicitly highlight the role of the tool. While research has shown that using these frameworks supports preservice secondary mathematics teachers (PSTs) developing noticing practices, it has also shown that PSTs largely overlook students' technology engagement when they are working on technology‐enhanced tasks ( Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 2010; 41(2):169–202). In this article, we describe our adaptation of Jacobs et al.'s framework for teacher noticing student mathematical thinking to include a focus on making students' technology‐tool engagement explicit when noticing in technology‐mediated environments, the Noticing in Technology‐Mediated Environments (NITE) framework. We describe the theoretical foundations of the framework, provide a video case example, and then illustrate how the framework can be used by mathematics teacher educators to support PSTs' noticing when students are working in technology‐mediated environments.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"6 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The practice of teacher noticing students' mathematical thinking often includes three interrelated components: attending to students' strategies, interpreting students' understandings, and deciding how to respond on the basis of students' understanding. This practice gains complexity in technology‐mediated environments (i.e., using technology‐enhanced math tasks) because it requires attending to and interpreting students' engagement with technology. Current frameworks implicitly assume the practice includes noticing the ways students use tools (including technology tools) in their work, but do not explicitly highlight the role of the tool. While research has shown that using these frameworks supports preservice secondary mathematics teachers (PSTs) developing noticing practices, it has also shown that PSTs largely overlook students' technology engagement when they are working on technology‐enhanced tasks ( Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 2010; 41(2):169–202). In this article, we describe our adaptation of Jacobs et al.'s framework for teacher noticing student mathematical thinking to include a focus on making students' technology‐tool engagement explicit when noticing in technology‐mediated environments, the Noticing in Technology‐Mediated Environments (NITE) framework. We describe the theoretical foundations of the framework, provide a video case example, and then illustrate how the framework can be used by mathematics teacher educators to support PSTs' noticing when students are working in technology‐mediated environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个支持教师在技术介导环境中注意学生数学思维的框架
教师关注学生数学思维的实践通常包括三个相互关联的组成部分:关注学生的策略,解释学生的理解,在学生理解的基础上决定如何应对。这种实践在技术介导的环境中(例如,使用技术增强的数学任务)变得更加复杂,因为它需要关注和解释学生与技术的互动。当前的框架隐含地假设实践包括注意学生在工作中使用工具(包括技术工具)的方式,但没有明确强调工具的作用。虽然研究表明,使用这些框架有助于职前中学数学教师(pst)发展注意实践,但研究也表明,pst在很大程度上忽视了学生在从事技术增强任务时的技术参与(Journal for research in mathematics Education, 2010;41(2): 169 - 202)。在本文中,我们描述了我们对Jacobs等人的教师注意学生数学思维框架的调整,包括在技术介导的环境中注意学生的技术工具参与的重点,即技术介导环境中的注意(NITE)框架。我们描述了该框架的理论基础,提供了一个视频案例,然后说明了数学教师教育工作者如何使用该框架来支持pst在学生在技术介导的环境中工作时的注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Impacting elementary STEM teacher leadership identities Fostering students' inquiry aptitudes and collaborative reasoning in higher education science courses with social annotation tools and collaborative platforms Re‐imagining professional learning communities in education: Placing teacher leadership in STEM context Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice What does a scientist look like? Children's perceptions of scientist gender and skin tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1