Host identity determines the bacterial and fungal community and network structures in the phyllosphere of plant species in a temperate steppe

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Phytobiomes Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1094/pbiomes-05-23-0038-r
Chunyan Guo, An Yang, Wen-Hao Zhang
{"title":"Host identity determines the bacterial and fungal community and network structures in the phyllosphere of plant species in a temperate steppe","authors":"Chunyan Guo, An Yang, Wen-Hao Zhang","doi":"10.1094/pbiomes-05-23-0038-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elucidating the plant-microbiome network is of importance in understanding species coexistence of natural ecosystems. Phyllosphere, which is the aerial parts of terrestrial plants, is inhabited by diverse microbes. However, few studies have focused on phyllosphere microbiome and plant-microbiome network in temperate grasslands. In this study, we explored the diversity, community structure, and network architecture of phyllosphere bacteria and fungi in 19 plant species native to the temperate grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. We obtained 3,313 and 758 phyllosphere bacterial and fungal OTUs, and found that the bacterial community was dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Firmicutes. The fungal community was dominated by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Plant identity exerted significant impacts on α-diversities of both bacterial and fungal communities. The composition of bacterial and fungal communities differed among plant species. Plant identity had a greater effect on fungal than on bacterial communities. Both bacterial and fungal network structures were characterized by specialized and modular, lowly connected and no nested properties. The plant-fungal network had a high level of specification, modularity, antinestedness and connectance compared to the plant-bacterial network. Our results suggest more intimate relationships between plants and phyllosphere fungi than between plants and phyllosphere bacteria, and that the phyllosphere fungal community is more resistant to environmental disturbance than the phyllosphere bacterial community in the temperate grassland ecosystem. These findings may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms by which species coexist and community stabilizes in the grassland ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":48504,"journal":{"name":"Phytobiomes Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytobiomes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-05-23-0038-r","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elucidating the plant-microbiome network is of importance in understanding species coexistence of natural ecosystems. Phyllosphere, which is the aerial parts of terrestrial plants, is inhabited by diverse microbes. However, few studies have focused on phyllosphere microbiome and plant-microbiome network in temperate grasslands. In this study, we explored the diversity, community structure, and network architecture of phyllosphere bacteria and fungi in 19 plant species native to the temperate grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. We obtained 3,313 and 758 phyllosphere bacterial and fungal OTUs, and found that the bacterial community was dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Firmicutes. The fungal community was dominated by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Plant identity exerted significant impacts on α-diversities of both bacterial and fungal communities. The composition of bacterial and fungal communities differed among plant species. Plant identity had a greater effect on fungal than on bacterial communities. Both bacterial and fungal network structures were characterized by specialized and modular, lowly connected and no nested properties. The plant-fungal network had a high level of specification, modularity, antinestedness and connectance compared to the plant-bacterial network. Our results suggest more intimate relationships between plants and phyllosphere fungi than between plants and phyllosphere bacteria, and that the phyllosphere fungal community is more resistant to environmental disturbance than the phyllosphere bacterial community in the temperate grassland ecosystem. These findings may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms by which species coexist and community stabilizes in the grassland ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寄主身份决定了温带草原植物种层圈内的细菌和真菌群落及网络结构
阐明植物-微生物网络对理解自然生态系统中物种共存具有重要意义。层球是陆生植物的空中部分,是多种微生物的栖息地。然而,对温带草原层圈微生物组和植物-微生物组网络的研究较少。本研究对内蒙古温带草原19种原生植物的层球细菌和真菌的多样性、群落结构和网络结构进行了研究。得到层球细菌和真菌OTUs分别为3313和758个,细菌群落以变形菌门、放线菌门和厚壁菌门为主。真菌群落以子囊菌门和担子菌门为主。植物特性对细菌和真菌群落α-多样性均有显著影响。不同植物种类的细菌和真菌群落组成不同。植物特性对真菌群落的影响大于对细菌群落的影响。细菌和真菌的网络结构都具有专门化、模块化、低连接、无嵌套的特点。与植物-细菌网络相比,植物-真菌网络具有较高的规格性、模块化、反利益性和连通性。研究结果表明,在温带草原生态系统中,植物与根层真菌的关系比植物与根层细菌的关系更为密切,根层真菌群落比根层细菌群落对环境干扰的抵抗力更强。这些发现可能有助于我们理解草原生态系统中物种共存和群落稳定的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Tomato’s Tale: Exploring taxonomy, biogeography, domestication and microbiome for enhanced resilience Disentangling shifts in the soil microbiome of potatoes infected with Rhizoctonia solani AG 3-PT in search of potential biocontrol agents Linnemannia elongata: a key species in chitin-based plant growth promotion High diversity of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens in poinsettia and detection of three pathogenicity plasmids for identification of C. f. pv. poinsettiae Deciphering the key players within the bacterial microbiota associated with aerial crown gall tumors on rhododendron: Insights into the gallobiome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1