Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test-8 with Portuguese Parents

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1155/2023/2524957
Nisa Rubina Pereira Souto Rosa, Maria Adriana Pereira Henriques, Maria Alice dos Santos Curado
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test-8 with Portuguese Parents","authors":"Nisa Rubina Pereira Souto Rosa, Maria Adriana Pereira Henriques, Maria Alice dos Santos Curado","doi":"10.1155/2023/2524957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Parents’ health literacy has a great impact on child’s care and health. Knowing parent’s health literacy levels is crucial to avoid the consequences of limited literacy and for the creation of better health policies and educational interventions. To assess those levels, we must have tools tailored to this population. However, there is a lack of specific instruments to evaluate this capacity in Portuguese parents of children aged less than 12 months. Aim. To perform the cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Parental Health Literacy Assessment Test-8 for use in Portugal. Methods. Methodological study is divided into two phases: cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The first phase followed the Beaton guidelines. The second, carried out with 176 parents, took place at a public hospital in Portugal, between October 2020 and June 2021. Data were analyzed for internal reliability using the Kuder–Richardson reliability coefficient (KR-20). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to estimate factor validity, applying polychoric correlation measures using the “lavaan package” for the R statistical package. Results. In the cultural adaptation, the expert committee adjusted the translated version, validating the content for Portuguese parents. At validation, the calculated value of KR-20 was approximately 0.50. The empirical indices of the goodness-of-fit of the factor model showed a good overall fit, although two of the items had low weights (0.24 and 0.32). The results of the factors show an acceptable value for the factor (FC = 0.756) and a lower value for the average variance extracted. Conclusion. The version of the instrument adapted for Portugal presented adequate semantic and content equivalence. The psychometrics suggested that the PHLAT-8-PT is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used systematically by the health team to measure the health literacy levels and improve health education.","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2524957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Parents’ health literacy has a great impact on child’s care and health. Knowing parent’s health literacy levels is crucial to avoid the consequences of limited literacy and for the creation of better health policies and educational interventions. To assess those levels, we must have tools tailored to this population. However, there is a lack of specific instruments to evaluate this capacity in Portuguese parents of children aged less than 12 months. Aim. To perform the cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Parental Health Literacy Assessment Test-8 for use in Portugal. Methods. Methodological study is divided into two phases: cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The first phase followed the Beaton guidelines. The second, carried out with 176 parents, took place at a public hospital in Portugal, between October 2020 and June 2021. Data were analyzed for internal reliability using the Kuder–Richardson reliability coefficient (KR-20). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to estimate factor validity, applying polychoric correlation measures using the “lavaan package” for the R statistical package. Results. In the cultural adaptation, the expert committee adjusted the translated version, validating the content for Portuguese parents. At validation, the calculated value of KR-20 was approximately 0.50. The empirical indices of the goodness-of-fit of the factor model showed a good overall fit, although two of the items had low weights (0.24 and 0.32). The results of the factors show an acceptable value for the factor (FC = 0.756) and a lower value for the average variance extracted. Conclusion. The version of the instrument adapted for Portugal presented adequate semantic and content equivalence. The psychometrics suggested that the PHLAT-8-PT is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used systematically by the health team to measure the health literacy levels and improve health education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙父母健康素养活动测试-8的文化适应与验证
背景。父母的健康素养对儿童的护理和健康有很大的影响。了解父母的卫生知识素养水平对于避免有限的知识素养造成的后果以及制定更好的卫生政策和教育干预措施至关重要。为了评估这些水平,我们必须有适合这一人群的工具。然而,缺乏具体的工具来评估未满12个月儿童的葡萄牙父母的这种能力。的目标。对葡萄牙使用的父母健康素养评估测试-8进行文化适应和心理计量学验证。方法。方法学研究分为两个阶段:文化适应和心理测量验证。第一阶段遵循比顿的指导方针。第二项研究于2020年10月至2021年6月在葡萄牙的一家公立医院进行,共有176名父母参与。采用库德-理查德森信度系数(KR-20)对数据进行内部信度分析。采用验证性因子分析来估计因子效度,对R统计包采用“lavaan包”的多重相关度量。结果。在文化改编方面,专家委员会对译文进行了调整,为葡萄牙家长验证了内容。验证时,KR-20的计算值约为0.50。因子模型的拟合优度实证指标总体拟合良好,但其中两个项目的权重较低(0.24和0.32)。因子的结果显示因子的可接受值(FC = 0.756)和提取的平均方差的较低值。结论。适用于葡萄牙的文书版本具有充分的语义和内容对等性。心理测量结果表明,phat -8- pt是一种可靠有效的工具,可被卫生团队系统地用于衡量健康素养水平,改善健康教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Enrollment ADN-BSN Programs: A Call to Expand Access to This Innovative Approach to the BSN Clinical Supervision in Improving the Quality of Nursing Care: Empowerment of Medical-Surgical Hospitalization Teams Preterm Infant Care Practice among Nurses in Neonatal Care Units of Selected Hospitals of Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study Self-Management Social Support in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis Stigma towards Chronically Ill Patients among Healthcare Workers Caring for COVID-19 Patients during the Outbreak in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1