Firm Product Similarity and Stock Price Comovement: Evidence from China

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/1540496x.2023.2253978
Shuxin Zheng, Yugang Yin, Yahui Liu
{"title":"Firm Product Similarity and Stock Price Comovement: Evidence from China","authors":"Shuxin Zheng, Yugang Yin, Yahui Liu","doi":"10.1080/1540496x.2023.2253978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article examines the effect of firm product similarity on stock price comovement. Using the financial data and annual reports of listed firms in the Chinese A-share market from January 2001 to December 2021, we find that firms with greater product similarity experience synchronized movements in their stock prices. This effect is driven by firm fundamentals, as demonstrated through major international events (Global Financial Crisis, European Sovereign Debt Crisis, and Trade Dispute between China and the U.S.) and domestic events (Two Sessions about the Deepening Overall Reform, and Central Economic Conference following the COVID-19 Outbreak). We also show that firms that release earnings announcements earlier contribute to the comovement of stock prices within their product-similarity cluster. Our findings are robust across various tests and provide insights into the dynamics of the Chinese A-share market.KEYWORDS: Firm product similaritystock price comovementexternal shockChinaJEL: G140G170G300 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Regression results for control variables in Tables 5, 7–9, 11 and 12 are omitted due to the limit of pages.2. In panel regressions throughout this article, the standard errors are clustered at the firm level with the year-fixed effects. In panel and Fama-MacBeth regressions, the unit of coefficients is in percentage. The t-statistics for corresponding coefficient estimates are presented within parentheses. ***, **, and * represent statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.3. Due to the high correlation among MOM, CLUSTER_MOM, and AREA_MOM, we only incorporate the significant one with the largest influence magnitude as control variables. In Table 3, the regression results with MOM is not displayed because it has relatively small impacts on CMVT.4. The Newey-West t-statistics are presented within parentheses.5. Guba is important investor social media in China that contains various retail investors posting their comments toward stocks and the market. We obtain Guba comments from Stock Comments Database in CNRDS (China Research Data Service), which begins from 2008 and with identifiers of positive and negative emotions.6. The Central Economic Work Conference is excluded in this test, because the event month is the last month in both the event year and our sample, therefore has no sufficient observations obtaining the estimation results.7. The reasons may be that except the sudden break and contagion of Global Financial Crisis that is prominent to be detected, the other three events are accompanied with gradual signals that occur before the event months, such as the debt crisis in Greece and the presidential memorandum signed by Donald Trump proposing levying tariffs under Special 301 Report. The Two Sessions also arouse hot discussions toward the policy directions before the conference date due to its special role, the details are in Appendix A.8. Because we focus on the instantaneous effect of major events to the link between product similarity and stock price comovement, we do not include all subsequent months of the breakpoint as Karavias, Narayan, and Joakim (Citation2023) do. Instead, we focus on the [−1,1] three months window around the event month to allow for the diffusion and delay of information before and after the shock, meanwhile control the noise of other events that may happen during the subsequent months.9. The mechanism analysis is not affected by this issue because the domestic and international events that affect firm fundamentals happens no earlier than March.10. We have 390,033 firm-month observations for each variable except ANALYST, which has 256,887 firm-month observations. This is because for most firms, data of analyst coverage starts from 2007 while data of other variables starts from 2002. To ensure the data completeness of our analysis and cover the time period as long as possible, we run baseline regressions with the original dataset with 390,033 observations, and include ANALYST separately with the dataset of 256,887 observations.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JBK2107146]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [71903154; 71873266].","PeriodicalId":11693,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Finance and Trade","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Finance and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2023.2253978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article examines the effect of firm product similarity on stock price comovement. Using the financial data and annual reports of listed firms in the Chinese A-share market from January 2001 to December 2021, we find that firms with greater product similarity experience synchronized movements in their stock prices. This effect is driven by firm fundamentals, as demonstrated through major international events (Global Financial Crisis, European Sovereign Debt Crisis, and Trade Dispute between China and the U.S.) and domestic events (Two Sessions about the Deepening Overall Reform, and Central Economic Conference following the COVID-19 Outbreak). We also show that firms that release earnings announcements earlier contribute to the comovement of stock prices within their product-similarity cluster. Our findings are robust across various tests and provide insights into the dynamics of the Chinese A-share market.KEYWORDS: Firm product similaritystock price comovementexternal shockChinaJEL: G140G170G300 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Regression results for control variables in Tables 5, 7–9, 11 and 12 are omitted due to the limit of pages.2. In panel regressions throughout this article, the standard errors are clustered at the firm level with the year-fixed effects. In panel and Fama-MacBeth regressions, the unit of coefficients is in percentage. The t-statistics for corresponding coefficient estimates are presented within parentheses. ***, **, and * represent statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.3. Due to the high correlation among MOM, CLUSTER_MOM, and AREA_MOM, we only incorporate the significant one with the largest influence magnitude as control variables. In Table 3, the regression results with MOM is not displayed because it has relatively small impacts on CMVT.4. The Newey-West t-statistics are presented within parentheses.5. Guba is important investor social media in China that contains various retail investors posting their comments toward stocks and the market. We obtain Guba comments from Stock Comments Database in CNRDS (China Research Data Service), which begins from 2008 and with identifiers of positive and negative emotions.6. The Central Economic Work Conference is excluded in this test, because the event month is the last month in both the event year and our sample, therefore has no sufficient observations obtaining the estimation results.7. The reasons may be that except the sudden break and contagion of Global Financial Crisis that is prominent to be detected, the other three events are accompanied with gradual signals that occur before the event months, such as the debt crisis in Greece and the presidential memorandum signed by Donald Trump proposing levying tariffs under Special 301 Report. The Two Sessions also arouse hot discussions toward the policy directions before the conference date due to its special role, the details are in Appendix A.8. Because we focus on the instantaneous effect of major events to the link between product similarity and stock price comovement, we do not include all subsequent months of the breakpoint as Karavias, Narayan, and Joakim (Citation2023) do. Instead, we focus on the [−1,1] three months window around the event month to allow for the diffusion and delay of information before and after the shock, meanwhile control the noise of other events that may happen during the subsequent months.9. The mechanism analysis is not affected by this issue because the domestic and international events that affect firm fundamentals happens no earlier than March.10. We have 390,033 firm-month observations for each variable except ANALYST, which has 256,887 firm-month observations. This is because for most firms, data of analyst coverage starts from 2007 while data of other variables starts from 2002. To ensure the data completeness of our analysis and cover the time period as long as possible, we run baseline regressions with the original dataset with 390,033 observations, and include ANALYST separately with the dataset of 256,887 observations.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JBK2107146]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [71903154; 71873266].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业产品相似度与股价变动:来自中国的证据
摘要本文考察了企业产品相似性对股票价格变动的影响。利用2001年1月至2021年12月中国a股上市公司的财务数据和年报,我们发现产品相似度较高的公司的股价呈现同步波动。这一效应是由坚实的基本面推动的,主要体现在重大国际事件(全球金融危机、欧洲主权债务危机、中美贸易争端)和国内事件(全面深化改革两会、新冠肺炎疫情后的中央经济会议)。我们还表明,较早发布收益公告的公司有助于其产品相似集群内的股票价格变动。我们的研究结果在各种测试中都是稳健的,并提供了对中国a股市场动态的见解。关键词:企业产品相似度;股价变动;外部冲击;中国ajel: G140G170G300披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。表5、表7 -表9、表11、表12中控制变量的回归结果,由于篇幅限制,略去。在本文的面板回归中,标准误差与年固定效应聚集在公司水平上。在面板回归和Fama-MacBeth回归中,系数的单位是百分比。相应系数估计的t统计量在括号内。***、**、*分别在1%、5%、10%水平下具有统计学显著性。由于MOM、CLUSTER_MOM和AREA_MOM之间的相关性较高,所以我们只选取影响幅度最大的显著变量作为控制变量。在表3中,由于MOM对cmvt的影响相对较小,所以没有显示MOM的回归结果。new - west的t统计数据在括号内。Guba是中国重要的投资者社交媒体,包含各种散户投资者对股票和市场的评论。我们从CNRDS(中国研究数据服务)的股票评论数据库中获得Guba评论,该数据库从2008年开始使用,具有积极和消极情绪的标识符。中央经济工作会议在本次检验中被排除,因为事件月份是事件年的最后一个月,也是我们样本的最后一个月,因此没有足够的观测值来获得估计结果。原因可能是,除了全球金融危机的突然爆发和蔓延,其他三个事件都伴随着希腊债务危机和特朗普签署的总统备忘录提议根据特别301报告征收关税等几个月前就出现的渐进信号。两会由于其特殊的作用,在会前也引发了对政策方向的热议,详情见附录A.8。因为我们关注的是重大事件对产品相似度和股价波动之间联系的瞬时影响,所以我们没有像Karavias、Narayan和Joakim (Citation2023)那样包括断点的所有后续月份。相反,我们将重点放在事件月份周围的[−1,1]三个月窗口上,以允许信息在冲击前后的扩散和延迟,同时控制随后几个月可能发生的其他事件的噪声。机制分析不受此问题影响,因为影响基本面稳固的国内外事件不早于3月10日发生。对于每个变量,我们有390,033个公司月观测值,除了ANALYST,它有256,887个公司月观测值。这是因为对于大多数公司来说,分析师覆盖率的数据从2007年开始,而其他变量的数据从2002年开始。为了确保分析的数据完整性并尽可能长时间地覆盖时间段,我们对原始数据集进行基线回归,其中包含390,033个观测值,并将ANALYST单独纳入数据集,其中包含256,887个观测值。本研究得到中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金[JBK2107146]的支持;国家自然科学基金[71903154];71873266)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Emerging Markets Finance and Trade publishes research papers on financial and economic aspects of emerging economies. The journal features contributions that are policy oriented and interdisciplinary, employing sound econometric methods, using macro, micro, financial, institutional, and political economy data. Geographical coverage includes emerging market economies of Europe, the Balkans, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Additionally, the journal will publish thematic issues and occasional special issues featuring selected research papers from major conferences worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investor Sentiment on Corporate Tax Avoidance from a Behavioral Finance Perspective How Does Macroprudential Policy Impact Bank Risk-Taking and Profitability: Evidence from Indian Commercial Banks Institutional Investor Distraction and Investment Efficiency Policy Effectiveness in Mitigating Pandemic-Induced Macroeconomic Impacts: Evidence from Large Net Oil Importers of Asia Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Firm value: The Moderating Role of CSR Contracting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1