Politicians Support (and Voters Reward) Intra-Party Reforms to Promote Transparency

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1177/13540688231203528
Miguel M Pereira, Susana Coroado, Luís de Sousa, Pedro C Magalhães
{"title":"Politicians Support (and Voters Reward) Intra-Party Reforms to Promote Transparency","authors":"Miguel M Pereira, Susana Coroado, Luís de Sousa, Pedro C Magalhães","doi":"10.1177/13540688231203528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political parties increasingly rely on self-regulation to promote ethical standards in office. The adoption of ethics self-regulation and its ability to induce change is likely to be a function of the responses from politicians and voters. Without external enforcement mechanisms, compliance requires support from legislators. In turn, if voters perceive self-regulation as cheap talk, officials have fewer incentives to acquiesce. The extent to which such efforts are rewarded by voters and supported by elected officials remains an open question. We examine this question in a paired conjoint experiment with elected officials and voters in Portugal and Spain. The results show that politicians support (and voters reward) financial disclosures, lobbying registries, and sanctions for MPs involved in corruption cases. Voters also reward term limits, and the effects are not moderated by ideological agreement. The findings suggest that parties can benefit from promoting transparency reforms and are not penalized by experimentation.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231203528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Political parties increasingly rely on self-regulation to promote ethical standards in office. The adoption of ethics self-regulation and its ability to induce change is likely to be a function of the responses from politicians and voters. Without external enforcement mechanisms, compliance requires support from legislators. In turn, if voters perceive self-regulation as cheap talk, officials have fewer incentives to acquiesce. The extent to which such efforts are rewarded by voters and supported by elected officials remains an open question. We examine this question in a paired conjoint experiment with elected officials and voters in Portugal and Spain. The results show that politicians support (and voters reward) financial disclosures, lobbying registries, and sanctions for MPs involved in corruption cases. Voters also reward term limits, and the effects are not moderated by ideological agreement. The findings suggest that parties can benefit from promoting transparency reforms and are not penalized by experimentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治家支持(选民也支持)党内改革以提高透明度
政党越来越多地依靠自我监管来提高公职人员的道德标准。道德自律的采用及其诱导变革的能力很可能取决于政治家和选民的反应。在没有外部强制机制的情况下,合规需要立法者的支持。反过来,如果选民认为自我监管只是空谈,官员们默许的动机就会减少。这些努力在多大程度上得到选民的回报和民选官员的支持,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。我们对葡萄牙和西班牙的民选官员和选民进行了配对实验,研究了这个问题。结果显示,政客们支持(选民也支持)财务披露、游说登记和对卷入腐败案件的议员的制裁。选民们也支持任期限制,而且这种影响不会因为意识形态上的一致而有所缓和。研究结果表明,各方可以从推动透明度改革中受益,而不会因实验而受到惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1