Complexities in teaching competencies: a longitudinal analysis of Vietnamese teachers’ sensemaking and practices

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/14681366.2023.2262473
Bich-Hang Duong, Vu Dao, Joan DeJaeghere
{"title":"Complexities in teaching competencies: a longitudinal analysis of Vietnamese teachers’ sensemaking and practices","authors":"Bich-Hang Duong, Vu Dao, Joan DeJaeghere","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2023.2262473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCompetency-based education (CBE) has been widely adopted in various educational contexts although research discussing how CBE is implemented in local contexts and how it shifts (or not) teaching practices is limited. This study explores how Vietnamese secondary teachers made sense of general competencies and adapted their teaching towards competency development. Using a sociocultural approach to sensemaking, this study examined secondary teachers’ interpretations and teaching practices of competencies. The study used a qualitative longitudinal design that included teacher interviews and video-cued reflections of their teaching practices. The findings illustrate teachers’ ambivalence about the new curriculum competencies and how to align their practices with the CBE reform. A common pattern across all teachers was that they made sense of competencies as learning foundational knowledge and skills, in addition to developing good attitudes, character, and morality. Over the years, teachers also emphasised the real-life application of competencies towards whole-person development. This study contributes to sociocultural perspectives on teaching and the CBE literature by showing the ways in which teachers used cultural ideas and artefacts to expand and limit their meanings of competencies in practice.KEYWORDS: Competency-based educationcurriculum reformsecondary educationteachers’ sensemakingteaching practicesVietnam AcknowledgementsWe would like to express our gratitude to the teachers who participated in this study, Dr. Lan Phuong Nguyen, Dr. Minh Phuong Luong and the research team at Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences (VNIES) who collected data and assisted with transcription in preparation for analysis. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback to improve our paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The idea/l of developing a well-rounded socialist person has long been reflected in Vietnam’s education policies and curricula since the early 1950s. The current ideal of well-rounded/holistic education envisions developing citizens to have knowledge, skills, well-being, and moral values necessary for future careers and citizenship (see Duong Citation2022).2. The data were gathered by Vietnamese researchers who were trained in these qualitative methods. Two of the authors conducted the training and oversaw the generation of data, including conducting interviews in schools in one province. Two of the authors are also Vietnamese educators and researchers who conducted the analysis in Vietnamese; data were also translated to English, and the third author was involved in reviewing and discussing all the analyses for this paper. We acknowledge all the researchers involved in the research in our acknowledgement statement.3. Vietnamese teachers have been familiar with the ‘KSA requirements for outcome standards’ for many years in the current curriculum.4. the names of the participants provided in this paper are pseudonyms to protect their confidentiality.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Oxford Policy Management, grant no. A0268 RISE Directorate, POI 1963.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2262473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTCompetency-based education (CBE) has been widely adopted in various educational contexts although research discussing how CBE is implemented in local contexts and how it shifts (or not) teaching practices is limited. This study explores how Vietnamese secondary teachers made sense of general competencies and adapted their teaching towards competency development. Using a sociocultural approach to sensemaking, this study examined secondary teachers’ interpretations and teaching practices of competencies. The study used a qualitative longitudinal design that included teacher interviews and video-cued reflections of their teaching practices. The findings illustrate teachers’ ambivalence about the new curriculum competencies and how to align their practices with the CBE reform. A common pattern across all teachers was that they made sense of competencies as learning foundational knowledge and skills, in addition to developing good attitudes, character, and morality. Over the years, teachers also emphasised the real-life application of competencies towards whole-person development. This study contributes to sociocultural perspectives on teaching and the CBE literature by showing the ways in which teachers used cultural ideas and artefacts to expand and limit their meanings of competencies in practice.KEYWORDS: Competency-based educationcurriculum reformsecondary educationteachers’ sensemakingteaching practicesVietnam AcknowledgementsWe would like to express our gratitude to the teachers who participated in this study, Dr. Lan Phuong Nguyen, Dr. Minh Phuong Luong and the research team at Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences (VNIES) who collected data and assisted with transcription in preparation for analysis. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback to improve our paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The idea/l of developing a well-rounded socialist person has long been reflected in Vietnam’s education policies and curricula since the early 1950s. The current ideal of well-rounded/holistic education envisions developing citizens to have knowledge, skills, well-being, and moral values necessary for future careers and citizenship (see Duong Citation2022).2. The data were gathered by Vietnamese researchers who were trained in these qualitative methods. Two of the authors conducted the training and oversaw the generation of data, including conducting interviews in schools in one province. Two of the authors are also Vietnamese educators and researchers who conducted the analysis in Vietnamese; data were also translated to English, and the third author was involved in reviewing and discussing all the analyses for this paper. We acknowledge all the researchers involved in the research in our acknowledgement statement.3. Vietnamese teachers have been familiar with the ‘KSA requirements for outcome standards’ for many years in the current curriculum.4. the names of the participants provided in this paper are pseudonyms to protect their confidentiality.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Oxford Policy Management, grant no. A0268 RISE Directorate, POI 1963.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学能力的复杂性:越南教师意义建构与实践的纵向分析
摘要能力本位教育已被广泛应用于各种教育情境中,但关于能力本位教育如何在地方情境中实施以及它如何改变(或不改变)教学实践的研究还很有限。本研究探讨越南中学教师如何理解一般胜任力,并使教学适应胜任力发展。本研究运用社会文化的方法,检视中学教师对胜任力的诠释与教学实践。该研究采用了定性的纵向设计,包括教师访谈和他们教学实践的视频反思。研究结果说明了教师对新课程能力的矛盾心理,以及如何将他们的实践与CBE改革相结合。所有教师的一个共同模式是,除了培养良好的态度、性格和道德之外,他们还把能力理解为学习基础知识和技能。多年来,教师们也强调能力在现实生活中的应用,以实现全人发展。本研究通过展示教师在实践中如何使用文化观念和人工制品来扩展和限制其能力的含义,从而有助于从社会文化的角度看待教学和CBE文献。关键词:能力本位教育课程改革中等教育教师意义教学实践越南致谢我们要感谢参与本研究的教师,Lan Phuong Nguyen博士,Minh Phuong Luong博士和越南教育科学研究所(VNIES)的研究团队,他们收集数据并协助转录,为分析做准备。我们也要感谢审稿人的建设性意见,以改进我们的论文。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。自20世纪50年代初以来,发展全面发展的社会主义人的理念一直反映在越南的教育政策和课程中。当前全面/全人教育的理想设想是培养公民拥有未来职业和公民身份所必需的知识、技能、福祉和道德价值观(见Duong Citation2022)。数据是由接受过这些定性方法培训的越南研究人员收集的。其中两位作者进行了培训并监督数据的生成,包括在一个省的学校进行采访。其中两位作者也是越南的教育工作者和研究人员,他们用越南语进行了分析;数据也被翻译成英文,第三作者参与了本文所有分析的审核和讨论。我们在致谢声明中感谢所有参与这项研究的研究人员。越南教师多年来一直熟悉当前课程中的“KSA对结果标准的要求”。为保护参与者的隐私,本文中提供的参与者姓名均为假名。本研究由牛津政策管理资助,资助号:A0268上升理事会,POI 1963。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Indigenous parents’ co-leadership through culturally responsive home-school partnerships: a practical implementation framework “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning Personal, pedagogic play: a dialogic model for video game learning Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice The manifestations of universality and cultural specificity in national curriculum policy frameworks: negotiations for culturally reflective practice in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1