Resisting right-wing populism in power: a comparative analysis of the Facebook activities of social movements in Italy and the UK

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2023.2262973
Nicolò Pennucci
{"title":"Resisting right-wing populism in power: a comparative analysis of the Facebook activities of social movements in Italy and the UK","authors":"Nicolò Pennucci","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2023.2262973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper aims to present a comparative study of the civil society reaction to right-wing populism in power through social media, by looking at cases in Italy and the United Kingdom. The research question is how social movements are implementing a process of reactive political identity construction – i.e. political identification – and a political counter-strategy by opposing right-wing populism in power through their Facebook official accounts. It implements a mixed-method research design with in-depth semi-structured interviews and a two-step quantitative text analysis based on Topic Model and Dictionary Method.KEYWORDS: Social movementssocial mediaright-wing populismtext-as-datamixed methods Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicolò PennucciNicolò Pennucci is a PhD candidate in Political Science and Sociology at the Scuola Normale Superiore, Florence (Italy). He works on civil society reaction to right-wing populism in the UK, Italy and the United States. He employs mixed method combining qualitative interviews and computational methods.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2262973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper aims to present a comparative study of the civil society reaction to right-wing populism in power through social media, by looking at cases in Italy and the United Kingdom. The research question is how social movements are implementing a process of reactive political identity construction – i.e. political identification – and a political counter-strategy by opposing right-wing populism in power through their Facebook official accounts. It implements a mixed-method research design with in-depth semi-structured interviews and a two-step quantitative text analysis based on Topic Model and Dictionary Method.KEYWORDS: Social movementssocial mediaright-wing populismtext-as-datamixed methods Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNicolò PennucciNicolò Pennucci is a PhD candidate in Political Science and Sociology at the Scuola Normale Superiore, Florence (Italy). He works on civil society reaction to right-wing populism in the UK, Italy and the United States. He employs mixed method combining qualitative interviews and computational methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制右翼民粹主义执政:意大利和英国社会运动在Facebook上活动的比较分析
摘要本文以意大利和英国为例,对比研究公民社会对右翼民粹主义执政的反应。研究的问题是,社会运动是如何通过Facebook官方账号来反对右翼民粹主义,从而实施一种反应性的政治认同构建过程——即政治认同——以及一种政治反策略。采用深度半结构化访谈和基于主题模型和词典法的两步定量文本分析的混合方法研究设计。关键词:社会运动社会媒体右翼民粹主义文本即数据混合方法披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。关于contributorsNicolò PennucciNicolò的说明Pennucci是意大利佛罗伦萨高等师范大学政治学和社会学的博士候选人。他在英国、意大利和美国从事民间社会对右翼民粹主义的反应研究。他采用了定性访谈和计算方法相结合的混合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1