Horizontal-to-tilt irradiance conversion for high-latitude regions: a review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1245223
Mattia Manni, Jacowb Krum Thorning, Sami Jouttijärvi, Kati Miettunen, Marisa Di Sabatino, Gabriele Lobaccaro
{"title":"Horizontal-to-tilt irradiance conversion for high-latitude regions: a review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mattia Manni, Jacowb Krum Thorning, Sami Jouttijärvi, Kati Miettunen, Marisa Di Sabatino, Gabriele Lobaccaro","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1245223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review focuses on the solar irradiance model chain for horizontal-to-tilted irradiance conversion at high latitudes. The main goals of the work are 1) to assess the extent to which the literature accounts for decomposition and transposition models specifically developed for high-latitude application; 2) to evaluate existing validation studies for these particular conditions; 3) to identify research gaps in the optimal solar irradiance model chain for high-latitude application (i.e., latitude ≥60°). In total, 112 publications are reviewed according to their publication year, country, climate, method, and keywords: 78 publications deal with decomposition models and 34 deal with transposition models. Only a few models (6) have been parameterized using data from Nordic countries. Here, we compare 57 decomposition models in terms of their performance in Nordic climate zones and analyze the geographical distribution of the data used to parametrize these models. By comparing the Normalized Root Mean Square Deviation coefficients for direct normal irradiation, the decomposition models Skartveit1 and Mondol1 are most effective on one-hour scale and Yang4 on one-minute scale. Recent studies on the empirical transposition models estimating the global tilted irradiation on vertical surfaces show the best performance for Perez4 and Muneer models. In addition, innovative methods such as artificial neural networks have been identified to further enhance the model chain. This review reveals that a validated model chain for estimating global tilted irradiation at high latitudes is missing from the literature. Moreover, there is a need for a universal validation protocol to ease the comparison of different studies.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1245223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review focuses on the solar irradiance model chain for horizontal-to-tilted irradiance conversion at high latitudes. The main goals of the work are 1) to assess the extent to which the literature accounts for decomposition and transposition models specifically developed for high-latitude application; 2) to evaluate existing validation studies for these particular conditions; 3) to identify research gaps in the optimal solar irradiance model chain for high-latitude application (i.e., latitude ≥60°). In total, 112 publications are reviewed according to their publication year, country, climate, method, and keywords: 78 publications deal with decomposition models and 34 deal with transposition models. Only a few models (6) have been parameterized using data from Nordic countries. Here, we compare 57 decomposition models in terms of their performance in Nordic climate zones and analyze the geographical distribution of the data used to parametrize these models. By comparing the Normalized Root Mean Square Deviation coefficients for direct normal irradiation, the decomposition models Skartveit1 and Mondol1 are most effective on one-hour scale and Yang4 on one-minute scale. Recent studies on the empirical transposition models estimating the global tilted irradiation on vertical surfaces show the best performance for Perez4 and Muneer models. In addition, innovative methods such as artificial neural networks have been identified to further enhance the model chain. This review reveals that a validated model chain for estimating global tilted irradiation at high latitudes is missing from the literature. Moreover, there is a need for a universal validation protocol to ease the comparison of different studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高纬度地区的水平-倾斜辐照度转换:综述和荟萃分析
本文综述了高纬度地区太阳辐照度水平-倾斜转换模型链。这项工作的主要目标是1)评估文献在多大程度上解释了专门为高纬度应用开发的分解和转置模型;2)评估针对这些特定条件的现有验证研究;3)确定高纬度(纬度≥60°)应用的最佳太阳辐照度模型链的研究空白。总共根据出版年份、国家、气候、方法和关键词对112种出版物进行了审查:78种出版物涉及分解模型,34种涉及转置模型。只有少数模型(6)使用北欧国家的数据进行了参数化。在这里,我们比较了57种分解模型在北欧气候区的表现,并分析了用于参数化这些模型的数据的地理分布。对比直接正常照射的归一化均方根偏差系数,分解模型Skartveit1和Mondol1在1小时尺度上最有效,Yang4在1分钟尺度上最有效。最近研究表明,估计垂直表面上全局倾斜辐照的经验转置模型中,Perez4和Muneer模型的性能最好。此外,还确定了人工神经网络等创新方法来进一步增强模型链。这篇综述表明,文献中缺少一个有效的模型链来估计高纬度地区的全球倾斜辐射。此外,需要一个通用的验证方案来简化不同研究的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
期刊最新文献
A case study on the implementation of location tracking technologies for productivity monitoring: understanding workers’ acceptance and socio-technical implications A computational approach for categorizing street segments in urban street networks based on topological properties Ground response of rolling dynamic compaction—a finite element modelling approach Adapting to climate change: snow load assessment of snow galleries on the Iron Ore Line in Northern Sweden Combination of cellulose nanofiber and artificial fusion protein for biocementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1