Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.56126/75.3.21
F Gheysen, S Rex
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology","authors":"F Gheysen, S Rex","doi":"10.56126/75.3.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and gaining attention in the medical world. Our aim is to provide readers with insights into this quickly changing medical landscape and the role of clinicians in the middle of this popular technology. In this review, our aim is to explain some of the increasingly frequently used AI terminology explicitly for physicians. Next, we give a summation, an overview of currently existing applications, future possibilities for AI in the medical field of anesthesiology and thoroughly highlight possible problems that could arise from implementing this technology in daily practice. Therefore, we conducted a literature search, including all types of articles published between the first of January 2010 and the 1st of May 2023, written in English, and having a free full text available. We searched Pubmed, Medline, and Embase using “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “deep learning”, “neural networks” and “anesthesiology” as MESH terms. To structure these findings, we divided the results into five categories: preoperatively, perioperatively, postoperatively, AI in the intensive care unit and finally, AI used for teaching purposes. In the first category, we found AI applications for airway assessment, risk prediction, and logistic support. Secondly, we made a summation of AI applications used during the operation. AI can predict hypotensive events, delivering automated anesthesia, reducing false alarms, and aiding in the analysis of ultrasound anatomy in locoregional anesthesia and echocardiography. Thirdly, namely postoperatively, AI can be applied in predicting acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and can help to diagnose postoperative pain in children. At the intensive care unit, AI tools discriminate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from pulmonary oedema in pleural ultrasound, predict mortality and sepsis more accurately, and predict survival rates in severe Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19). Finally, AI has been described in training residents in spinal ultrasound, simulation, and plexus block anatomy. Several concerns must be addressed regarding the use of AI. Firstly, this software does not explain its decision process (i.e., the ‘black box problem’). Secondly, to develop AI models and decision support systems, we need big and accurate datasets, unfortunately with potential unknown bias. Thirdly, we need an ethical and legal framework before implementing this technology. At the end of this paper, we discuss whether this technology will be able to replace the clinician one day. This paper adds value to already existing literature because it not only offers a summation of existing literature on AI applications in anesthesiology but also gives clear definitions of AI itself and critically assesses implementation of this technology.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/75.3.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and gaining attention in the medical world. Our aim is to provide readers with insights into this quickly changing medical landscape and the role of clinicians in the middle of this popular technology. In this review, our aim is to explain some of the increasingly frequently used AI terminology explicitly for physicians. Next, we give a summation, an overview of currently existing applications, future possibilities for AI in the medical field of anesthesiology and thoroughly highlight possible problems that could arise from implementing this technology in daily practice. Therefore, we conducted a literature search, including all types of articles published between the first of January 2010 and the 1st of May 2023, written in English, and having a free full text available. We searched Pubmed, Medline, and Embase using “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “deep learning”, “neural networks” and “anesthesiology” as MESH terms. To structure these findings, we divided the results into five categories: preoperatively, perioperatively, postoperatively, AI in the intensive care unit and finally, AI used for teaching purposes. In the first category, we found AI applications for airway assessment, risk prediction, and logistic support. Secondly, we made a summation of AI applications used during the operation. AI can predict hypotensive events, delivering automated anesthesia, reducing false alarms, and aiding in the analysis of ultrasound anatomy in locoregional anesthesia and echocardiography. Thirdly, namely postoperatively, AI can be applied in predicting acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and can help to diagnose postoperative pain in children. At the intensive care unit, AI tools discriminate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from pulmonary oedema in pleural ultrasound, predict mortality and sepsis more accurately, and predict survival rates in severe Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19). Finally, AI has been described in training residents in spinal ultrasound, simulation, and plexus block anatomy. Several concerns must be addressed regarding the use of AI. Firstly, this software does not explain its decision process (i.e., the ‘black box problem’). Secondly, to develop AI models and decision support systems, we need big and accurate datasets, unfortunately with potential unknown bias. Thirdly, we need an ethical and legal framework before implementing this technology. At the end of this paper, we discuss whether this technology will be able to replace the clinician one day. This paper adds value to already existing literature because it not only offers a summation of existing literature on AI applications in anesthesiology but also gives clear definitions of AI itself and critically assesses implementation of this technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉学中的人工智能
人工智能(AI)正在迅速发展并引起医学界的关注。我们的目标是为读者提供对这一快速变化的医学景观和临床医生在这一流行技术中的作用的见解。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是为医生明确解释一些日益频繁使用的人工智能术语。接下来,我们对人工智能在麻醉医学领域的现有应用进行总结、概述,并全面强调在日常实践中实施该技术可能出现的问题。因此,我们进行了文献检索,包括2010年1月1日至2023年5月1日之间发表的所有类型的英文文章,并有免费的全文。我们使用“人工智能”、“机器学习”、“深度学习”、“神经网络”和“麻醉学”作为MESH术语搜索Pubmed、Medline和Embase。为了构建这些发现,我们将结果分为五类:术前、围手术期、术后、重症监护病房中的人工智能以及最后用于教学目的的人工智能。在第一类中,我们发现人工智能应用于气道评估、风险预测和后勤支持。其次,我们对操作过程中使用的AI应用进行了总结。人工智能可以预测低血压事件,提供自动麻醉,减少误报,并帮助分析局部麻醉和超声心动图中的超声解剖。第三,即术后,AI可用于预测急性肾损伤、肺部并发症、术后认知功能障碍,并有助于诊断儿童术后疼痛。在重症监护病房,人工智能工具在胸膜超声中区分急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和肺水肿,更准确地预测死亡率和败血症,并预测严重冠状病毒-19 (COVID-19)患者的生存率。最后,人工智能在训练住院医生进行脊柱超声、模拟和神经丛阻滞解剖方面进行了描述。关于人工智能的使用,必须解决几个问题。首先,这个软件没有解释它的决策过程(即“黑匣子问题”)。其次,为了开发人工智能模型和决策支持系统,我们需要庞大而准确的数据集,不幸的是,这些数据集可能存在未知的偏差。第三,在实施这项技术之前,我们需要一个道德和法律框架。在本文的最后,我们讨论了这项技术是否有一天能够取代临床医生。这篇论文增加了已有文献的价值,因为它不仅总结了人工智能在麻醉学中的应用,而且给出了人工智能本身的明确定义,并批判性地评估了这项技术的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
期刊最新文献
Long-term cognitive dysfunction after COVID ARDS Trends in female authorship in Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica from 2005 to 2021 General anesthesia for maternal surgery during pregnancy: dogmas, myths and evidence, a narrative review Clinical relevance of nocebo effects in anesthesia practice: a narrative review Gender equality and equity in anaesthesia research: Why are we still talking about numbers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1