Wave modulation in a strong tidal current and its impact on extreme waves

IF 2.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Journal of Physical Oceanography Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1175/jpo-d-23-0051.1
Trygve Halsne, Alvise Benetazzo, Francesco Barbariol, Kai Håkon Christensen, Ana Carrasco, Øyvind Breivik
{"title":"Wave modulation in a strong tidal current and its impact on extreme waves","authors":"Trygve Halsne, Alvise Benetazzo, Francesco Barbariol, Kai Håkon Christensen, Ana Carrasco, Øyvind Breivik","doi":"10.1175/jpo-d-23-0051.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate estimates of extreme waves are central for maritime activities, and stochastic wave models are the best option available for practical applications. However, the way currents influence the statistics of space-time extremes in spectral wave models has not been properly assessed. Here we demonstrate impacts of the wave modulation caused by one of the world’s strongest open ocean tidal currents, which reaches speeds of at least 3 m s −1 . For a bimodal swell and wind sea state, we find that most intense interactions occur when the wind sea opposes the tidal current, with an increase in significant wave height and spectral steepness up to 45 % and 167 %, respectively. The steepness modulation strengthen the second-order Stokes contribution for the normalized extreme crests, which increases between 5–14 % during opposing wind sea and current. The normalized extreme wave heights have a strong dependence on the narrow-bandedness parameter, which is sensitive to the variance distribution in the bimodal spectrum, and we find an increase up to 12 % with currents opposing the wind sea. In another case of swell opposing a tidal jet, we find the spectral steepness to exceed the increase predicted by a simplified modulation model. We find support in single-point observations that using tidal currents as forcing in wave models improves the representation of the expected maximum waves, but that action must be taken to close the gap of measurements in strong currents.","PeriodicalId":56115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","volume":"4 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-23-0051.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimates of extreme waves are central for maritime activities, and stochastic wave models are the best option available for practical applications. However, the way currents influence the statistics of space-time extremes in spectral wave models has not been properly assessed. Here we demonstrate impacts of the wave modulation caused by one of the world’s strongest open ocean tidal currents, which reaches speeds of at least 3 m s −1 . For a bimodal swell and wind sea state, we find that most intense interactions occur when the wind sea opposes the tidal current, with an increase in significant wave height and spectral steepness up to 45 % and 167 %, respectively. The steepness modulation strengthen the second-order Stokes contribution for the normalized extreme crests, which increases between 5–14 % during opposing wind sea and current. The normalized extreme wave heights have a strong dependence on the narrow-bandedness parameter, which is sensitive to the variance distribution in the bimodal spectrum, and we find an increase up to 12 % with currents opposing the wind sea. In another case of swell opposing a tidal jet, we find the spectral steepness to exceed the increase predicted by a simplified modulation model. We find support in single-point observations that using tidal currents as forcing in wave models improves the representation of the expected maximum waves, but that action must be taken to close the gap of measurements in strong currents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强潮流中的波调制及其对极端波的影响
对极端波浪的准确估计是海洋活动的核心,而随机波浪模型是实际应用的最佳选择。然而,在谱波模型中,电流对时空极值统计的影响方式尚未得到适当的评估。在这里,我们展示了由世界上最强的开放海洋潮汐流之一引起的波浪调制的影响,其速度至少达到3米每秒。对于双峰涌浪和风海状态,我们发现风海与潮流相反时相互作用最强烈,显著波高和谱陡分别增加45%和167%。陡度调制增强了归一化极峰的二阶Stokes贡献,在对风、对海、对流条件下,二阶Stokes贡献增加了5 ~ 14%。归一化极值波高对窄带参数有很强的依赖性,窄带参数对双峰谱的方差分布很敏感,当海流与风海方向相反时,极值波高增加了12%。在另一种涌浪与潮喷流相对的情况下,我们发现谱陡度超出了简化调制模型预测的增量。我们在单点观测中发现,在波浪模型中使用潮流作为强迫可以改善预期最大波浪的表示,但必须采取行动来缩小在强流中测量的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Oceanography (JPO) (ISSN: 0022-3670; eISSN: 1520-0485) publishes research related to the physics of the ocean and to processes operating at its boundaries. Observational, theoretical, and modeling studies are all welcome, especially those that focus on elucidating specific physical processes. Papers that investigate interactions with other components of the Earth system (e.g., ocean–atmosphere, physical–biological, and physical–chemical interactions) as well as studies of other fluid systems (e.g., lakes and laboratory tanks) are also invited, as long as their focus is on understanding the ocean or its role in the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Why is the Westward Rossby Wave Propagation from the California Coast “Too Fast”? Observations of Parametric Subharmonic Instability of Diurnal Internal Tides in the Northwest Pacific Imprint of chaos on the ocean energy cycle from an eddying North Atlantic ensemble Interpreting Negative IOD Events Based on the Transfer Routes of Wave Energy in the Upper Ocean On the Pathways of Wind-Driven Coastal Upwelling: Nonlinear Momentum Flux and Baroclinic Instability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1