Generalized log-logistic proportional hazard model: a non-penalty shrinkage approach

IF 1.2 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistics Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/02331888.2023.2280072
Quinn Forzley, Shakhawat Hossain, Shahedul A. Khan
{"title":"Generalized log-logistic proportional hazard model: a non-penalty shrinkage approach","authors":"Quinn Forzley, Shakhawat Hossain, Shahedul A. Khan","doi":"10.1080/02331888.2023.2280072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper considers the pretest and shrinkage estimation methods for estimating regression parameters of the generalized log-logistic proportional hazard (PH) model. This model is a simple extension of the log-logistic model, which is closed under the PH relationship. The generalized log-logistic PH model also has attributes similar to those of the Weibull model. We consider this model for right-censored data when some parameters shrink to a restricted subspace. This subspace information on the parameters is used to shrink the unrestricted model estimates toward the restricted model estimates. We then optimally combine the unrestricted and restricted estimates in order to define pretest and shrinkage estimators. Although this estimation procedure may increase bias, it also reduces the overall mean squared error. The efficacy of the proposed model and estimation techniques are shown using a simulation study as well as an application to real data. We also compare the performance of generalized log-logistic, Weibull, and Cox PH models for unimodal and increasing hazards. The shrinkage estimator poses less risk than the maximum likelihood estimator when the shrinkage dimension exceeds two; this is shown through simulation and real data applications.Keywords: Generalized log-logistic distributionWeibull distributionCox proportional hazard modelmaximum likelihoodMonte Carlo simulationshrinkage and pretest estimators2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62N02 AcknowledgementsThe authors are thankful to the editor, associate editor, and two referees for their valuable and insightful comments, which have significantly enhanced the quality of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research work was partially supported by NSERC through Discovery Grants to S Hossain (#419428) and SA Khan (#368532).","PeriodicalId":54358,"journal":{"name":"Statistics","volume":"28 52","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2023.2280072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis paper considers the pretest and shrinkage estimation methods for estimating regression parameters of the generalized log-logistic proportional hazard (PH) model. This model is a simple extension of the log-logistic model, which is closed under the PH relationship. The generalized log-logistic PH model also has attributes similar to those of the Weibull model. We consider this model for right-censored data when some parameters shrink to a restricted subspace. This subspace information on the parameters is used to shrink the unrestricted model estimates toward the restricted model estimates. We then optimally combine the unrestricted and restricted estimates in order to define pretest and shrinkage estimators. Although this estimation procedure may increase bias, it also reduces the overall mean squared error. The efficacy of the proposed model and estimation techniques are shown using a simulation study as well as an application to real data. We also compare the performance of generalized log-logistic, Weibull, and Cox PH models for unimodal and increasing hazards. The shrinkage estimator poses less risk than the maximum likelihood estimator when the shrinkage dimension exceeds two; this is shown through simulation and real data applications.Keywords: Generalized log-logistic distributionWeibull distributionCox proportional hazard modelmaximum likelihoodMonte Carlo simulationshrinkage and pretest estimators2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62N02 AcknowledgementsThe authors are thankful to the editor, associate editor, and two referees for their valuable and insightful comments, which have significantly enhanced the quality of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research work was partially supported by NSERC through Discovery Grants to S Hossain (#419428) and SA Khan (#368532).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广义对数-逻辑比例风险模型:一种非惩罚收缩方法
摘要本文研究了广义对数-逻辑比例风险(PH)模型回归参数估计的预检验和收缩估计方法。该模型是逻辑-逻辑模型的简单扩展,在PH关系下是封闭的。广义逻辑-逻辑PH模型也具有与威布尔模型相似的属性。我们考虑了当某些参数收缩到受限子空间时的右截尾数据模型。该参数的子空间信息用于将不受限制的模型估计缩小到受限制的模型估计。然后,我们最优地结合无限制和限制估计,以定义预测试和收缩估计。虽然这种估计过程可能会增加偏差,但它也减少了总体均方误差。通过仿真研究和对实际数据的应用,证明了所提出的模型和估计技术的有效性。我们还比较了广义逻辑逻辑、威布尔和Cox PH模型在单峰和增加危险情况下的性能。当收缩维数大于2时,收缩估计量的风险小于最大似然估计量;通过仿真和实际数据应用证明了这一点。关键词:广义逻辑-逻辑分布;威布尔分布;cox比例风险模型;最大似然;蒙特卡罗模拟;收缩和预检验估计;2020数学学科分类:62N02致谢作者感谢编辑、副编辑和两位审稿人宝贵而深刻的意见,他们大大提高了本文的质量。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究工作部分由NSERC通过发现补助金支持S侯赛因(#419428)和SA Khan(#368532)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics
Statistics 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Statistics publishes papers developing and analysing new methods for any active field of statistics, motivated by real-life problems. Papers submitted for consideration should provide interesting and novel contributions to statistical theory and its applications with rigorous mathematical results and proofs. Moreover, numerical simulations and application to real data sets can improve the quality of papers, and should be included where appropriate. Statistics does not publish papers which represent mere application of existing procedures to case studies, and papers are required to contain methodological or theoretical innovation. Topics of interest include, for example, nonparametric statistics, time series, analysis of topological or functional data. Furthermore the journal also welcomes submissions in the field of theoretical econometrics and its links to mathematical statistics.
期刊最新文献
Robust estimator of the ruin probability in infinite time for heavy-tailed distributions Gaussian modeling with B-splines for spatial functional data on irregular domains A note on the asymptotic behavior of a mildly unstable integer-valued AR(1) model Explainable machine learning for financial risk management: two practical use cases Online updating Huber robust regression for big data streams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1