Major Placenta Previa in Advanced Age Among Nulliparous With Cesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 0.3 Q4 NURSING International Journal of Childbirth Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1891/ijc-2022-0114
Azza Ismail El Sayed, Mirfat Mohamed Labib Elkashif, Thanaa Ali Ahmad Elawany, Azza Mohamed Fathy, Howaida Amin Hassan Fahmy Elsaba
{"title":"Major Placenta Previa in Advanced Age Among Nulliparous With Cesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Azza Ismail El Sayed, Mirfat Mohamed Labib Elkashif, Thanaa Ali Ahmad Elawany, Azza Mohamed Fathy, Howaida Amin Hassan Fahmy Elsaba","doi":"10.1891/ijc-2022-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Major placenta previa with advanced maternal age (AMA) is a significant risk factor for obstetric hemorrhage and associated maternal and neonatal complications. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study major placenta previa in advanced age among nulliparous with cesarean section. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study analyzes 78 pregnant women of advanced age with major placenta previa under a cesarean section. Data were collected using interview questionnaires between January 2019 and June 2020. RESULTS: The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.7 ± 3 years. Antepartum hemorrhage, premature membrane rupture, and placenta accreta occurred in 15.4%, 35.9%, and 15.4% of cases, respectively. About 12.8% of women were at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Fetal distress, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and cesarean hysterectomy occurred in 37.2%, 46.2%, and 15.4% of patients. Mean Apgar scores in the first and fifth minutes were 7.0 ± 0.90 and 8.0 ± 0.82, respectively. The mean birth weight was 2.7 ± 0.14823. Of neonates, 37.2% were premature, 37.2% required resuscitation, less than half (44.9%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 37.2% had respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, there is a statistically significant relationship between placenta accreta and cesarean hysterectomies and the occurrence of PPH. Also, a highly significant association was observed between the use of antenatal steroids, fetal distress, Apgar score <3 at 1 minute, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: Major placenta previa with AMA significantly influences pregnancy outcomes and is considered an obstetric emergency. Therefore, early detection of major placenta previa and proper management during clinical care is essential.","PeriodicalId":43300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childbirth","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/ijc-2022-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Major placenta previa with advanced maternal age (AMA) is a significant risk factor for obstetric hemorrhage and associated maternal and neonatal complications. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study major placenta previa in advanced age among nulliparous with cesarean section. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study analyzes 78 pregnant women of advanced age with major placenta previa under a cesarean section. Data were collected using interview questionnaires between January 2019 and June 2020. RESULTS: The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.7 ± 3 years. Antepartum hemorrhage, premature membrane rupture, and placenta accreta occurred in 15.4%, 35.9%, and 15.4% of cases, respectively. About 12.8% of women were at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Fetal distress, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and cesarean hysterectomy occurred in 37.2%, 46.2%, and 15.4% of patients. Mean Apgar scores in the first and fifth minutes were 7.0 ± 0.90 and 8.0 ± 0.82, respectively. The mean birth weight was 2.7 ± 0.14823. Of neonates, 37.2% were premature, 37.2% required resuscitation, less than half (44.9%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 37.2% had respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, there is a statistically significant relationship between placenta accreta and cesarean hysterectomies and the occurrence of PPH. Also, a highly significant association was observed between the use of antenatal steroids, fetal distress, Apgar score <3 at 1 minute, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: Major placenta previa with AMA significantly influences pregnancy outcomes and is considered an obstetric emergency. Therefore, early detection of major placenta previa and proper management during clinical care is essential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产无产高龄患者的主要前置胎盘:一项横断面研究
重度前置胎盘伴高龄产妇(AMA)是产科出血及相关产妇和新生儿并发症的重要危险因素。目的:探讨高龄无产剖宫产患者的主要前置胎盘。方法:本前瞻性横断面研究分析了78例高龄高龄高龄前置胎盘剖宫产孕妇。数据是在2019年1月至2020年6月期间通过访谈问卷收集的。结果:平均胎龄为35.7±3岁。产前出血占15.4%,胎膜早破占35.9%,胎盘增生占15.4%。约12.8%的妇女有患创伤后应激障碍症状的风险。胎儿窘迫、产后出血(PPH)和剖宫产子宫切除术发生率分别为37.2%、46.2%和15.4%。第1分钟和第5分钟Apgar评分平均值分别为7.0±0.90和8.0±0.82。平均出生体重为2.7±0.14823。37.2%的新生儿早产,37.2%的新生儿需要复苏,不到一半(44.9%)的新生儿被送入新生儿重症监护病房,37.2%的新生儿患有呼吸窘迫综合征。此外,胎盘增生和剖宫产子宫切除术与PPH的发生有统计学意义。此外,在使用产前类固醇、胎儿窘迫、1分钟Apgar评分<3和新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征之间观察到高度显著的关联。结论:重度前置胎盘合并AMA显著影响妊娠结局,被认为是一种产科急诊。因此,早期发现主要前置胎盘并在临床护理中进行适当的处理是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Association Between Cesarean Scar Length and Postoperative Pain Antenatal Care Service Utilization and Its Associated Factors Among Somali Women Interval Versus External Pelvimetry: A Validation Study With Clinical Implications Role of Uterocervical Angle, Cervical Length, and Cervicovaginal Fetal Fibronectin in the Prediction of Preterm Birth Life in the Village: Cultural Values and Maternal Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1