The Architectonics of Hope: Fragments of Life and Text in Walter Benjamin and Hart Crane

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE COMPARATIVE LITERATURE Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1215/00104124-10475458
John Hoffmeyer
{"title":"The Architectonics of Hope: Fragments of Life and Text in Walter Benjamin and Hart Crane","authors":"John Hoffmeyer","doi":"10.1215/00104124-10475458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay develops a comparative account of Walter Benjamin’s and Hart Crane’s architectonic metaphors for text, culture, and history. I argue that theorist and poet alike employ parallel conceptual frameworks that analogize the “building” of the text to the condensation and constellation of disjunctive historical materials, thereby resisting progressivist conceptions of literary and cultural tradition. I further highlight the ways in which, for both figures, experiences of built images are ever-mediated, in contrast to certain strains of extant scholarship that interpret Crane’s poetry and Benjamin’s philosophy as dependent on the fiction of immediate affective experience, as if sensory perception were not always-already conditioned by the mediating abstractions of cognition and memory. Motivated by the personal and political struggles both men faced as outcasts, their visions of the fragmented cityscape as imbued with a complex, compositional logic of form and history ground, at once, the possibility of textual communicability and the preservation and transmission of memory—personal, collective, historical, and cultural. It is by virtue of this shared formal-historical logic—and the faith in a better future persisting therein—that I develop and defend Benjamin’s and Crane’s “architectonics of hope.”","PeriodicalId":45160,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-10475458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay develops a comparative account of Walter Benjamin’s and Hart Crane’s architectonic metaphors for text, culture, and history. I argue that theorist and poet alike employ parallel conceptual frameworks that analogize the “building” of the text to the condensation and constellation of disjunctive historical materials, thereby resisting progressivist conceptions of literary and cultural tradition. I further highlight the ways in which, for both figures, experiences of built images are ever-mediated, in contrast to certain strains of extant scholarship that interpret Crane’s poetry and Benjamin’s philosophy as dependent on the fiction of immediate affective experience, as if sensory perception were not always-already conditioned by the mediating abstractions of cognition and memory. Motivated by the personal and political struggles both men faced as outcasts, their visions of the fragmented cityscape as imbued with a complex, compositional logic of form and history ground, at once, the possibility of textual communicability and the preservation and transmission of memory—personal, collective, historical, and cultural. It is by virtue of this shared formal-historical logic—and the faith in a better future persisting therein—that I develop and defend Benjamin’s and Crane’s “architectonics of hope.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希望的建筑:瓦尔特·本雅明和哈特·克兰的生活片段和文本
摘要本文对本雅明和克兰在文本、文化和历史方面的建筑隐喻进行了比较分析。我认为,理论家和诗人都采用平行的概念框架,将文本的“构建”类比为分离的历史材料的凝聚和集合,从而抵制文学和文化传统的进步主义概念。我进一步强调,对于这两个人物来说,建筑形象的体验都是中介的,这与现存的一些学者将克兰的诗歌和本雅明的哲学解释为依赖于直接情感体验的虚构,就好像感官知觉并不总是已经被认知和记忆的中介抽象所制约。受个人和政治斗争的驱使,两人都面临着被驱逐者,他们对破碎的城市景观的看法充满了复杂的,形式和历史基础的组合逻辑,同时,文本交流的可能性以及个人,集体,历史和文化记忆的保存和传播。正是基于这种共同的形式历史逻辑,以及对更美好未来的信念,我发展并捍卫了本雅明和克兰的“希望架构”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The oldest journal in its field in the United States, Comparative Literature explores issues in literary history and theory. Drawing on a variety of theoretical and critical approaches, the journal represents a wide-ranging look at the intersections of national literatures, global literary trends, and theoretical discourse. Continually evolving since its inception in 1949, the journal remains a source for cutting-edge scholarship and prides itself on presenting the work of talented young scholars breaking new ground in the field.
期刊最新文献
"Nature is (Non)existent: Autoradiography, Object-Oriented Ecological Aesthetic, Psychoanalytical Alternative " Na Do-hyang’s Translation of “Camellia” and the Plural Source Texts Chaplin Connection: Comparative Reading of S. Eisenstein and W. Benjamin The Use of Art in Retail Spaces in
the Digital Environment: Focusing on Haus Dosan Le Château de Pictordu de George Sand : l’expression littéraire d’une réflexion artistique et le problème du fantastique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1