Improving Stormwater Runoff Quality using Wasted activated Carbon from a Household Water Purifier

Seoyoon Choi, Yu Jeong Shin, Byeongmin Chae, Seoyeon Mo, Moon-Hyon Hwang, Do Gyun Lee
{"title":"Improving Stormwater Runoff Quality using Wasted activated Carbon from a Household Water Purifier","authors":"Seoyoon Choi, Yu Jeong Shin, Byeongmin Chae, Seoyeon Mo, Moon-Hyon Hwang, Do Gyun Lee","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2023.45.5.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : To recycle the wasted activated carbon from water purifiers and reuse stormwater runoff, this study evaluated water quality of stormwater runoff with regeneration using granular activated carbon containing commercial activated carbon for water treatment and wasted activated carbon from household water purifiers.Methods : The removal of total coliforms, chloride, BOD, T-N, T-P, turbidity, and pH in stormwater runoff were analyzed by down-flow column test using granular activated carbon with varied mixing ratios. In addition, chemical modification with ferrous sulfate and ultrasonic treatment were conducted to improve the removal efficiency of total coliforms, and turbidity.Results and Discussion : The optimal mixing ratio of granular activated carbon was 7:3 (GAC:WGAC), which showed high removal efficiency of 88.2% for total coliforms, 70.8% for chloride, 72.6% for BOD, 88.4% for T-N, 50.7% for T-P, and 85.9% for turbidity. The granular activated carbon with surface modification using a 0.2 M FeSO<sub>4</sub> solution with ultrasonic treatment demonstrated the highest removal efficiency, with a reduction of 11.8% in total coliforms, 29.2% in chloride, 12.1% in BOD, 20.3% in T-P, and 13.2% in turbidity, while T-N showed a decrease of 19.4% in removal efficiency.Conclusion : The granular activated carbon with a 7:3 mixing ratio showed highest removal efficiencies for all water quality parameters, while the total coliforms and turbidity did not meet the water quality standards for reclaimed water. This indicated that further physicochemical surface modification with FeSO<sub>4</sub> and ultrasonic treatment was needed to improve the removal performance and meet the water quality standards for reclaimed water. This approach explored in this study using wasted activated carbon should be continued in the area of resource and water circulation to properly utilize resources of wastes.","PeriodicalId":16127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2023.45.5.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives : To recycle the wasted activated carbon from water purifiers and reuse stormwater runoff, this study evaluated water quality of stormwater runoff with regeneration using granular activated carbon containing commercial activated carbon for water treatment and wasted activated carbon from household water purifiers.Methods : The removal of total coliforms, chloride, BOD, T-N, T-P, turbidity, and pH in stormwater runoff were analyzed by down-flow column test using granular activated carbon with varied mixing ratios. In addition, chemical modification with ferrous sulfate and ultrasonic treatment were conducted to improve the removal efficiency of total coliforms, and turbidity.Results and Discussion : The optimal mixing ratio of granular activated carbon was 7:3 (GAC:WGAC), which showed high removal efficiency of 88.2% for total coliforms, 70.8% for chloride, 72.6% for BOD, 88.4% for T-N, 50.7% for T-P, and 85.9% for turbidity. The granular activated carbon with surface modification using a 0.2 M FeSO4 solution with ultrasonic treatment demonstrated the highest removal efficiency, with a reduction of 11.8% in total coliforms, 29.2% in chloride, 12.1% in BOD, 20.3% in T-P, and 13.2% in turbidity, while T-N showed a decrease of 19.4% in removal efficiency.Conclusion : The granular activated carbon with a 7:3 mixing ratio showed highest removal efficiencies for all water quality parameters, while the total coliforms and turbidity did not meet the water quality standards for reclaimed water. This indicated that further physicochemical surface modification with FeSO4 and ultrasonic treatment was needed to improve the removal performance and meet the water quality standards for reclaimed water. This approach explored in this study using wasted activated carbon should be continued in the area of resource and water circulation to properly utilize resources of wastes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用家用净水器产生的废弃活性炭改善雨水径流质量
目的:为了回收净水器中废弃的活性炭和雨水径流的再利用,本研究使用含商用活性炭的颗粒活性炭进行水处理,并使用家用净水器中废弃的活性炭进行再生,对雨水径流的水质进行了评估。方法:采用不同混合比例的颗粒活性炭,通过下流柱试验分析了雨水径流中总大肠菌群、氯化物、BOD、T-N、T-P、浊度和pH的去除效果。此外,采用硫酸亚铁化学改性和超声波处理提高了总大肠菌群的去除率和浊度。结果与讨论:颗粒活性炭的最佳混合比为7:3 (GAC:WGAC),对总大肠菌群的去除率为88.2%,对氯化物的去除率为70.8%,对BOD的去除率为72.6%,对T-N的去除率为88.4%,对T-P的去除率为50.7%,对浊度的去除率为85.9%。使用0.2 M FeSO<sub>4</sub>超声处理后的水体对总大肠菌群、氯离子、生化需氧量、T-P、浊度的去除率分别降低11.8%、29.2%、12.1%、20.3%和13.2%,而对T-N的去除率则降低19.4%。结论:混合比为7:3的颗粒活性炭对各水质参数的去除率最高,但总大肠菌群和浊度均不符合再生水水质标准。这表明FeSO<sub>4</sub>为了提高再生水的去除率,达到再生水的水质标准,需要进行超声处理。本研究探索的利用废活性炭的方法应在资源和水循环领域继续推广,以合理利用废物资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waste Plastic Pyrolysis Industry: Current Status and Prospects Measures for Achieving Carbon Neutrality in Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants Geometrical Optimization of Closed-End Cylindrical Air Filter Using CFD Simulation Korean Offshore Wind Electrical Power Generation: Current Status and Prospects Analysis of the Contribution to the Domestic Timber Industry according to the Shortening of Final Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1