{"title":"Dosimetric Analysis of Limiting Pelvic Bone Dose in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer","authors":"Hao Qiu, Xin Liu, Meifang Fang, Xianxiang Wu, Dawei Zhou, Hanfei Cai","doi":"10.7546/crabs.2023.09.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies have indicated the significant importance of pelvic dose in the radiotherapy process for cervical cancer patients. However, research on the actual pelvic bone dose in the treatment of cervical cancer patients using different techniques is currently relatively limited. In this study, we selected 50 postoperative cervical cancer patients. For each patient, three treatment plans with pelvic dose constraints were designed: sIMRT, VMAT, and HT. Statistical analysis was conducted on the target area and organ at risk parameters of the three groups of plans. The results indicate that all three treatment plans meet the clinical requirements. Regarding organs at risk, compared to the sIMRT and VMAT groups, the HT group showed a reduction of 11.85% and 11.07%, respectively, in V40 of bladder. Additionally, compared to the sIMRT and HT groups, the VMAT group exhibited a reduction of 14.94% and 9.53%, respectively, in V10 of pelvic bone. Furthermore, compared to the sIMRT and HT groups, the VMAT group showed a reduction of 10.76% and 6.75%, respectively, in V20 of pelvic bone, and these differences were also statistically significant (t = 21.630, t = –16.621, P < 0.05). In summary, individualized treatment design can be conducted in clinical practice based on the specific conditions of patients.","PeriodicalId":50652,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus De L Academie Bulgare Des Sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus De L Academie Bulgare Des Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2023.09.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numerous studies have indicated the significant importance of pelvic dose in the radiotherapy process for cervical cancer patients. However, research on the actual pelvic bone dose in the treatment of cervical cancer patients using different techniques is currently relatively limited. In this study, we selected 50 postoperative cervical cancer patients. For each patient, three treatment plans with pelvic dose constraints were designed: sIMRT, VMAT, and HT. Statistical analysis was conducted on the target area and organ at risk parameters of the three groups of plans. The results indicate that all three treatment plans meet the clinical requirements. Regarding organs at risk, compared to the sIMRT and VMAT groups, the HT group showed a reduction of 11.85% and 11.07%, respectively, in V40 of bladder. Additionally, compared to the sIMRT and HT groups, the VMAT group exhibited a reduction of 14.94% and 9.53%, respectively, in V10 of pelvic bone. Furthermore, compared to the sIMRT and HT groups, the VMAT group showed a reduction of 10.76% and 6.75%, respectively, in V20 of pelvic bone, and these differences were also statistically significant (t = 21.630, t = –16.621, P < 0.05). In summary, individualized treatment design can be conducted in clinical practice based on the specific conditions of patients.
大量研究表明盆腔剂量在宫颈癌患者放疗过程中具有重要意义。然而,目前对不同技术治疗宫颈癌患者的实际盆腔骨剂量的研究相对有限。在本研究中,我们选择了50例宫颈癌术后患者。对于每位患者,设计了三种骨盆剂量限制的治疗方案:sIMRT、VMAT和HT。对三组方案的靶区和危险器官参数进行统计分析。结果表明,三种治疗方案均符合临床要求。对于危险器官,与sIMRT和VMAT组相比,HT组膀胱V40分别降低11.85%和11.07%。此外,与sIMRT和HT组相比,VMAT组骨盆骨V10分别降低了14.94%和9.53%。VMAT组骨盆骨V20较sIMRT组和HT组分别降低10.76%和6.75%,差异也有统计学意义(t = 21.630, t = -16.621, P <0.05)。综上所述,在临床实践中可以根据患者的具体情况进行个性化的治疗设计。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1948 by academician Georgy Nadjakov, "Comptes rendus de l’Académie bulgare des Sciences" is also known as "Доклади на БАН","Доклады Болгарской академии наук" and "Proceeding of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences".
If applicable, the name of the journal should be abbreviated as follows: C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. (according to ISO)