Would Carnap Have Tolerated Modern Metaphysics?

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY MONIST Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/monist/onad016
Wouter A Cohen, Benjamin Marschall
{"title":"Would Carnap Have Tolerated Modern Metaphysics?","authors":"Wouter A Cohen, Benjamin Marschall","doi":"10.1093/monist/onad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract AbstractIt is well known that Carnap, early in his philosophical career, took most of metaphysics to consist of meaningless pseudostatements. In contrast to this meaning-theoretic critique of metaphysics, we develop what we take to be Carnap’s later value-based critique. We argue that this later critique is forceful against several central contemporary metaphysical debates, its origin in the principle of tolerance notwithstanding.","PeriodicalId":47322,"journal":{"name":"MONIST","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MONIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onad016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract AbstractIt is well known that Carnap, early in his philosophical career, took most of metaphysics to consist of meaningless pseudostatements. In contrast to this meaning-theoretic critique of metaphysics, we develop what we take to be Carnap’s later value-based critique. We argue that this later critique is forceful against several central contemporary metaphysical debates, its origin in the principle of tolerance notwithstanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡尔纳普会容忍现代形而上学吗?
摘要:众所周知,卡尔纳普在其哲学生涯的早期,认为形而上学的大部分都是无意义的假陈述。与这种形而上学的意义理论批判相反,我们发展了卡尔纳普后来的基于价值的批判。我们认为,这种后来的批评是有力的反对几个核心的当代形而上学的辩论,其起源的原则,宽容尽管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MONIST
MONIST PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Disingenuous Infallibilism Knowledge-First Inferential Evidence: A Response to Dunn How Infallibilists Can Have It All How Not to Be a Fallibilist Really Knowing: A Collocational Argument for an Infallibilist Sense of ‘Know’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1