[Local anesthetic mixtures in various regional anesthesia procedures].

C Schnorr, T Menges, G Hempelmann
{"title":"[Local anesthetic mixtures in various regional anesthesia procedures].","authors":"C Schnorr,&nbsp;T Menges,&nbsp;G Hempelmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of local anaesthetic mixtures in regional anaesthesia has been discussed controversially. This assumption led us to conduct an inquiry on anaesthesiologist opinion on local anaesthetic mixtures. The study was performed on 131 anaesthesiologists answering a questionnaire. It was asked how often and how many procedures of regional anaesthesia were performed, whether local anaesthetic mixtures were used or not, and what were the most common mixtures. Other questions were in what kind of regional anaesthesia mixtures were applied, and which causes led to the use of local anaesthetic mixtures. Local anaesthetic mixtures were used by 70.2% of the anaesthesiologists who responded. Generally, however, parent components were preferred (88.3%). The types of regional anaesthesia in which mixtures were applied, were blockades of plexus brachialis (50.4%), spinal anaesthesia (29.0%), and epidural anaesthesia (28.4%). Locally applied anaesthetic mixtures - in 40.5% a mixture of bupivacaine and prilocaine and in 38.2% a mixture of bupivacaine and mepivacaine - were used in 58.0% because of their short latency and their long duration. In 27.5% the reply was that the anaesthesiologists used such combinations since in these the maximal doses of the parent components were not exceeded. In 22.9% it was argued that mixtures were less toxic than the parent components. On the other hand, the application of local anaesthetic mixtures was rejected because of their unpredictable effect (33.6%), and also to avoid local anaesthetic interactions (13.7%). The results of the inquiry demonstrate that the use of local anaesthetic mixtures in regional anaesthesia is common practice. However, mixing local anaesthetics may produce unpredictable interactions. We conclude that mixtures of local anaesthetics should be used only in exceptional cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 3","pages":"193-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of local anaesthetic mixtures in regional anaesthesia has been discussed controversially. This assumption led us to conduct an inquiry on anaesthesiologist opinion on local anaesthetic mixtures. The study was performed on 131 anaesthesiologists answering a questionnaire. It was asked how often and how many procedures of regional anaesthesia were performed, whether local anaesthetic mixtures were used or not, and what were the most common mixtures. Other questions were in what kind of regional anaesthesia mixtures were applied, and which causes led to the use of local anaesthetic mixtures. Local anaesthetic mixtures were used by 70.2% of the anaesthesiologists who responded. Generally, however, parent components were preferred (88.3%). The types of regional anaesthesia in which mixtures were applied, were blockades of plexus brachialis (50.4%), spinal anaesthesia (29.0%), and epidural anaesthesia (28.4%). Locally applied anaesthetic mixtures - in 40.5% a mixture of bupivacaine and prilocaine and in 38.2% a mixture of bupivacaine and mepivacaine - were used in 58.0% because of their short latency and their long duration. In 27.5% the reply was that the anaesthesiologists used such combinations since in these the maximal doses of the parent components were not exceeded. In 22.9% it was argued that mixtures were less toxic than the parent components. On the other hand, the application of local anaesthetic mixtures was rejected because of their unpredictable effect (33.6%), and also to avoid local anaesthetic interactions (13.7%). The results of the inquiry demonstrate that the use of local anaesthetic mixtures in regional anaesthesia is common practice. However, mixing local anaesthetics may produce unpredictable interactions. We conclude that mixtures of local anaesthetics should be used only in exceptional cases.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[不同区域麻醉过程中的局麻药混合物]。
局部麻醉混合物在局部麻醉中的应用一直存在争议。这一假设导致我们对麻醉师对局部麻醉混合物的意见进行了调查。这项研究对131名麻醉师进行了问卷调查。询问进行区域麻醉的频率和次数,是否使用局部麻醉混合物,以及最常见的混合物是什么。其他问题还包括使用何种局部麻醉混合物,以及导致使用局部麻醉混合物的原因。70.2%回应的麻醉师使用局麻药混合物。但总体而言,亲成分更受青睐(88.3%)。使用混合麻醉的区域麻醉类型为臂丛阻滞(50.4%)、脊髓麻醉(29.0%)和硬膜外麻醉(28.4%)。局部麻醉混合物(40.5%为布比卡因和丙罗卡因的混合物,38.2%为布比卡因和甲哌卡因的混合物)的使用率为58.0%,因为它们的潜伏期短,持续时间长。27.5%的答复是麻醉师使用这种组合,因为在这些组合中,母体成分的最大剂量没有超过。22.9%的人认为混合物的毒性比母体成分小。另一方面,因其不可预测的效果(33.6%)和避免局部麻醉相互作用(13.7%)而拒绝使用局部麻醉混合物。调查结果表明,在区域麻醉中使用局麻药混合物是常见的做法。然而,混合局部麻醉剂可能会产生不可预测的相互作用。我们得出结论,局部麻醉剂的混合物应该只在特殊情况下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The measurement of extravascular lung water--significant in the follow-up of ARDS?]. [Fat emulsions in parenteral feeding following liver transplantation. I. Effect on the recovery of RES function in the transplant]. [The effect of selective decontamination on nosocomial infections, their causative agents and antibiotic resistance in long-term intubated intensive care patients]. [Hypothermia and polytrauma. A case report (28 degrees C)]. [The present situation and developing trends in intensive medicine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1