Innovation dynamics in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Industry and Innovation Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1080/13662716.2023.2272724
Jacob R. Holm, Daniel S. Hain, Roman Jurowetzki, Edward Lorenz
{"title":"Innovation dynamics in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue","authors":"Jacob R. Holm, Daniel S. Hain, Roman Jurowetzki, Edward Lorenz","doi":"10.1080/13662716.2023.2272724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this paper, we discuss the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on innovation dynamics and argue that AI has affected innovation dynamics in at least two distinct ways. First, innovation using AI has unique dynamics that are characterised by data playing a central role and the increasing importance of external collaboration; however, data security and privacy issues also present new risks to external collaboration. When innovating in AI, collaboration with customers and competitors is critical, yet there are considerable risks associated with data sharing. Second, unique organisational challenges emerge during the diffusion of AI innovations, because adopting AI in an organisation not only results in the need for additional employee competencies but also challenges organisational power structures. We also discuss the merits of AI as a general purpose technology and argue that conclusions about AI in relation to innovation dynamics are likely to change when generative AI is widely adopted.KEYWORDS: Artificial intelligenceinnovation dynamicsinnovation processinnovation collaborationorganisational changeJEL CLASSIFICATION: O31O33O36 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The acronym ‘GPT’ is commonly used to represent both ‘general-purpose technology’ and ‘generative pretrained transformer’. The latter refers to the neural network architecture developed by OpenAI in 2018 that powers the ChatGPT system. Variants of the third generation and GPT-4 are used in this system, which was released in late 2022 and has sparked widespread discussion about AI among both mainstream audiences and academia. In this paper, ‘GPT’ represents ‘general-purpose technology’.","PeriodicalId":13585,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Innovation","volume":"27 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2272724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn this paper, we discuss the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on innovation dynamics and argue that AI has affected innovation dynamics in at least two distinct ways. First, innovation using AI has unique dynamics that are characterised by data playing a central role and the increasing importance of external collaboration; however, data security and privacy issues also present new risks to external collaboration. When innovating in AI, collaboration with customers and competitors is critical, yet there are considerable risks associated with data sharing. Second, unique organisational challenges emerge during the diffusion of AI innovations, because adopting AI in an organisation not only results in the need for additional employee competencies but also challenges organisational power structures. We also discuss the merits of AI as a general purpose technology and argue that conclusions about AI in relation to innovation dynamics are likely to change when generative AI is widely adopted.KEYWORDS: Artificial intelligenceinnovation dynamicsinnovation processinnovation collaborationorganisational changeJEL CLASSIFICATION: O31O33O36 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The acronym ‘GPT’ is commonly used to represent both ‘general-purpose technology’ and ‘generative pretrained transformer’. The latter refers to the neural network architecture developed by OpenAI in 2018 that powers the ChatGPT system. Variants of the third generation and GPT-4 are used in this system, which was released in late 2022 and has sparked widespread discussion about AI among both mainstream audiences and academia. In this paper, ‘GPT’ represents ‘general-purpose technology’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能时代的创新动态:专刊导论
摘要本文讨论了人工智能(AI)对创新动态的影响,并认为AI至少以两种不同的方式影响着创新动态。首先,利用人工智能进行创新具有独特的动力,其特点是数据发挥核心作用,外部协作的重要性日益增加;然而,数据安全和隐私问题也给外部协作带来了新的风险。在人工智能领域进行创新时,与客户和竞争对手的合作至关重要,但与数据共享相关的风险相当大。其次,在人工智能创新的传播过程中出现了独特的组织挑战,因为在组织中采用人工智能不仅需要额外的员工能力,而且还挑战了组织的权力结构。我们还讨论了人工智能作为通用技术的优点,并认为当生成式人工智能被广泛采用时,关于人工智能与创新动态相关的结论可能会发生变化。关键词:人工智能;创新动态;创新过程;创新协作;组织变革;注1缩写“GPT”通常用于表示“通用技术”和“生成预训练变压器”。后者指的是OpenAI在2018年开发的神经网络架构,为ChatGPT系统提供动力。该系统使用了第三代和GPT-4的变体,该系统于2022年底发布,引发了主流受众和学术界对人工智能的广泛讨论。在本文中,“GPT”代表“通用技术”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Industry and Innovation is an international refereed journal presenting high-quality original scholarship of the dynamics of industries and innovation. Interdisciplinary in nature, Industry and Innovation is informed by, and contributes in turn to, advancing the theoretical frontier within economics, organization theory, and economic geography. Theoretical issues encompass: •What are the institutional underpinnings for different organizational forms? •How are different industrial structures and institutions related to innovation patterns and economic performance?
期刊最新文献
Exploring the nexus of organisational culture and sustainability for green innovation The emergence of new regional technological specialisations: exploring the role of organisations and their technological network structure Partnering with green start-ups: a vehicle for eco-innovation? R&D policy instrument mix sequencing: evaluating the impact of receiving R&D grants and R&D tax credits over time on firm-level R&D Firms’ patenting and collective cumulative knowledge: evidence from the largest R&D investors in the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1