Comparative Analysis of Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulation Arc Therapy in Brain Tumor Cases to Minimize Radiation Dose to Organs at Risk

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.58860/ijsh.v2i10.111
Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman, Sugeng Rianto, Agung Nugroho Setiawan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulation Arc Therapy in Brain Tumor Cases to Minimize Radiation Dose to Organs at Risk","authors":"Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman, Sugeng Rianto, Agung Nugroho Setiawan","doi":"10.58860/ijsh.v2i10.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiotherapy technique is a systematic radiation planning method or procedure used for cancer treatment in the field of radiotherapy. Modern radiotherapy techniques allow the delivery of high doses at target volumes without dose escalation to at-risk organs, offering the possibility of better local control while maintaining a good quality of life. This study aims to analyze the difference in Treatment Planning System (TPS) results between Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulation Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques in irradiation of brain tumors with Glioblastoma cases based on the dose received by the target volume and Organ at risk, as well as the results of the isodose curve. The research design used was Cross-Sectional and qualitative analysis. Data was obtained from simulation results in the Treatment Planning System (TPS) as a Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) by conducting Literature Studies, Observations, Documentation, and FGD Techniques. This research will be conducted in July 2023 at the Radiation Oncology Installation of Siloam MRCCC Hospital Semanggi. A study was conducted on 11 patients with brain tumors who received radiation therapy with IMRT or VMAT techniques. The results of this study showed no significant difference in dose received by the target volume and dose of Organ at risk in both techniques in statistical tests, but based on the average results descriptively showed that the VMAT technique was better than the IMRT technique. This is indicated by the dose received by the target volume according to the plan.","PeriodicalId":44967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v2i10.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiotherapy technique is a systematic radiation planning method or procedure used for cancer treatment in the field of radiotherapy. Modern radiotherapy techniques allow the delivery of high doses at target volumes without dose escalation to at-risk organs, offering the possibility of better local control while maintaining a good quality of life. This study aims to analyze the difference in Treatment Planning System (TPS) results between Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulation Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques in irradiation of brain tumors with Glioblastoma cases based on the dose received by the target volume and Organ at risk, as well as the results of the isodose curve. The research design used was Cross-Sectional and qualitative analysis. Data was obtained from simulation results in the Treatment Planning System (TPS) as a Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) by conducting Literature Studies, Observations, Documentation, and FGD Techniques. This research will be conducted in July 2023 at the Radiation Oncology Installation of Siloam MRCCC Hospital Semanggi. A study was conducted on 11 patients with brain tumors who received radiation therapy with IMRT or VMAT techniques. The results of this study showed no significant difference in dose received by the target volume and dose of Organ at risk in both techniques in statistical tests, but based on the average results descriptively showed that the VMAT technique was better than the IMRT technique. This is indicated by the dose received by the target volume according to the plan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调强放射治疗与体积调弧放射治疗在脑肿瘤中的比较分析,以减少对危险器官的辐射剂量
放射治疗技术是放射治疗领域中用于癌症治疗的一种系统的放射计划方法或程序。现代放射治疗技术允许在不增加剂量的情况下以靶体积向危险器官输送高剂量,从而在保持良好生活质量的同时提供更好的局部控制的可能性。本研究旨在分析强度调节放射治疗(IMRT)与体积调节弧线治疗(VMAT)技术在脑肿瘤伴胶质母细胞瘤病例照射中的治疗计划系统(TPS)结果的差异,基于靶体积和危险器官接受的剂量,以及等剂量曲线的结果。研究设计采用横断面定性分析。通过文献研究、观察、文献记录和FGD技术,从治疗计划系统(TPS)中的模拟结果中获得剂量体积直方图(DVH)的数据。这项研究将于2023年7月在西罗亚MRCCC医院Semanggi放射肿瘤学装置进行。对11名接受IMRT或VMAT技术放射治疗的脑肿瘤患者进行了一项研究。本研究结果显示,两种技术的靶体积所受剂量和危及器官剂量在统计学检验中无显著差异,但根据平均结果描述性地表明VMAT技术优于IMRT技术。这是根据计划的目标体积所接受的剂量来表示的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care
International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Health literacy of forcibly displaced (migrant) women during the COVID-19 pandemic: a grounded theory study The Relationship Between the Severity of Acne Vulgaris and the Quality of Life of Prima Indonesia University Medical Faculty Students The (big) role of family constellations in return migration and transnationalism The Role of Telemedicine Technology in Stroke Patient Care Implementation of the Radiation Hazard Allowance Policy for Radiation Workers in Health Service Facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1