Demand and Welfare Analysis in Discrete Choice Models with Social Interactions

IF 5.9 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Review of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1093/restud/rdad053
Debopam Bhattacharya, Pascaline Dupas, Shin Kanaya
{"title":"Demand and Welfare Analysis in Discrete Choice Models with Social Interactions","authors":"Debopam Bhattacharya, Pascaline Dupas, Shin Kanaya","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdad053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many real-life settings of individual choice involve social interactions, causing targeted policies to have spillover effects. This article develops novel empirical tools for analysing demand and welfare effects of policy interventions in binary choice settings with social interactions. Examples include subsidies for health-product adoption and vouchers for attending a high-achieving school. We show that even with fully parametric specifications and unique equilibrium, choice data, that are sufficient for counterfactual demand prediction under interactions, are insufficient for welfare calculations. This is because distinct underlying mechanisms producing the same interaction coefficient can imply different welfare effects and deadweight-loss from a policy intervention. Standard index restrictions imply distribution-free bounds on welfare. We propose ways to identify and consistently estimate the structural parameters and welfare bounds allowing for unobserved group effects that are potentially correlated with observables and are possibly unbounded. We illustrate our results using experimental data on mosquito-net adoption in rural Kenya.","PeriodicalId":48449,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Many real-life settings of individual choice involve social interactions, causing targeted policies to have spillover effects. This article develops novel empirical tools for analysing demand and welfare effects of policy interventions in binary choice settings with social interactions. Examples include subsidies for health-product adoption and vouchers for attending a high-achieving school. We show that even with fully parametric specifications and unique equilibrium, choice data, that are sufficient for counterfactual demand prediction under interactions, are insufficient for welfare calculations. This is because distinct underlying mechanisms producing the same interaction coefficient can imply different welfare effects and deadweight-loss from a policy intervention. Standard index restrictions imply distribution-free bounds on welfare. We propose ways to identify and consistently estimate the structural parameters and welfare bounds allowing for unobserved group effects that are potentially correlated with observables and are possibly unbounded. We illustrate our results using experimental data on mosquito-net adoption in rural Kenya.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有社会相互作用的离散选择模型中的需求与福利分析
摘要在现实生活中,许多个体选择都涉及社会互动,导致针对性政策具有溢出效应。本文开发了新的实证工具,用于分析具有社会互动的二元选择环境中政策干预的需求和福利效应。这方面的例子包括为采用保健产品提供补贴,以及为进入成绩优异的学校提供代金券。我们表明,即使有充分的参数规范和唯一的均衡,选择数据,这是足够的反事实需求预测在相互作用下,是不够的福利计算。这是因为产生相同相互作用系数的不同潜在机制可能意味着政策干预的不同福利效应和无谓损失。标准指数限制意味着福利不受分配限制。我们提出了识别和一致估计结构参数和福利界限的方法,允许未观察到的群体效应与可观察到的潜在相关,并且可能是无界的。我们使用肯尼亚农村蚊帐采用的实验数据来说明我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Founded in 1933 by a group of young British and American economists, The Review of Economic Studies aims to encourage research in theoretical and applied economics, especially by young economists. Today it is widely recognised as one of the core top-five economics journals. The Review is essential reading for economists and has a reputation for publishing path-breaking papers in theoretical and applied economics. The Review is committed to continuing to publish strong papers in all areas of economics. The Editors aim to provide an efficient and high-quality review process to the Review''s authors. Where articles are sent out for full review, authors receive careful reports and feedback. Since 1989 The Review has held annual May Meetings to offer young students in economics and finance the chance to present their research to audiences in Europe.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Foundations of Efficient Rational Expectations Capital Regulation and Shadow Finance: A Quantitative Analysis Bargaining as a Struggle Between Competing Attempts at Commitment Contingent Thinking and the Sure-Thing Principle: Revisiting Classic Anomalies in the Laboratory Single-Crossing Differences in Convex Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1