Racial and gender differences in financial advice seeking: Evidence from the National Financial Capability Study

Miranda Reiter, Di Qing
{"title":"Racial and gender differences in financial advice seeking: Evidence from the National Financial Capability Study","authors":"Miranda Reiter,&nbsp;Di Qing","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a growing interest to increase diversity among consumers who are seeking financial advice, but the influences of race and gender on financial advice seeking have not been widely explored in the literature. We examine the role of race and gender on financial advice seeking among U.S. households by employing a decomposition technique. The findings highlight that asking for financial advice is not determined by race or gender in and of itself, but by the racial and gender differences in the predictors associated with financial advice seeking. Black and female consumers were found to be more likely to ask for financial advice when making savings and investment decisions. The relationships between financial advice seeking and income level, employment status, education level, and subjective knowledge differed significantly for Black and White consumers. Employment status, race, and homeownership differed significantly for women and men seeking financial advice. The results show that the predictors which explain financial advice seeking may not apply in the same way to all consumers. Practitioners can use this research to refine how they market and gain a better understanding of how race and gender are associated with certain important variables that are associated with seeking financial advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest to increase diversity among consumers who are seeking financial advice, but the influences of race and gender on financial advice seeking have not been widely explored in the literature. We examine the role of race and gender on financial advice seeking among U.S. households by employing a decomposition technique. The findings highlight that asking for financial advice is not determined by race or gender in and of itself, but by the racial and gender differences in the predictors associated with financial advice seeking. Black and female consumers were found to be more likely to ask for financial advice when making savings and investment decisions. The relationships between financial advice seeking and income level, employment status, education level, and subjective knowledge differed significantly for Black and White consumers. Employment status, race, and homeownership differed significantly for women and men seeking financial advice. The results show that the predictors which explain financial advice seeking may not apply in the same way to all consumers. Practitioners can use this research to refine how they market and gain a better understanding of how race and gender are associated with certain important variables that are associated with seeking financial advice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻求财务咨询的种族和性别差异:来自国家财务能力研究的证据
越来越多的人希望增加寻求财务建议的消费者的多样性,但文献中尚未广泛探讨种族和性别对寻求财务建议的影响。我们采用分解技术研究了种族和性别对美国家庭寻求理财建议的影响。研究结果表明,征求理财建议本身并不是由种族或性别决定的,而是由与征求理财建议相关的预测因素的种族和性别差异决定的。研究发现,黑人和女性消费者在做出储蓄和投资决策时更有可能寻求理财建议。黑人和白人消费者在寻求理财建议与收入水平、就业状况、教育水平和主观知识之间的关系上存在显著差异。对于寻求理财建议的女性和男性而言,就业状况、种族和房屋所有权也有显著差异。研究结果表明,解释寻求理财建议的预测因素可能并不适用于所有消费者。从业人员可以利用这项研究来改进他们的营销方式,并更好地了解种族和性别如何与寻求理财建议的某些重要变量相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Value of Holistic Financial Advice Investors' Response to Market Volatility and Financial Sophistication Issue Information Delaying until it is definitely too late – A theoretical framework for explaining procrastination in estate planning Mapping the Terrain: Strategies for Building Effective University Financial Planning Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1