Increased Risk of Tooth Loss in Postmenopausal Women With Prevalent Vertebral Fractures: An Observational Study

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1002/jbm4.10822
Akira Taguchi, Tomohiko Urano, Yukio Nakamura, Masataka Shiraki
{"title":"Increased Risk of Tooth Loss in Postmenopausal Women With Prevalent Vertebral Fractures: An Observational Study","authors":"Akira Taguchi,&nbsp;Tomohiko Urano,&nbsp;Yukio Nakamura,&nbsp;Masataka Shiraki","doi":"10.1002/jbm4.10822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The association between prevalent fractures and tooth loss in postmenopausal women remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the association between prevalent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, the number of teeth present at baseline, and the number of teeth lost during follow-up in postmenopausal Japanese women. This cross-sectional study enrolled 843 participants (mean age 68.3 years). The number of teeth at follow-up was evaluated in 655 women in this longitudinal study. The participants were divided into four groups according to their prevalent fracture status: no fractures, vertebral fractures alone, nonvertebral fractures alone, and both fracture types. After adjusting for covariates, Poisson regression analyses were performed to investigate differences in the number of teeth at baseline and that lost during the follow-up period among the four groups. Participants with prevalent vertebral fractures alone had significantly fewer teeth at baseline than those in participants without fractures or nonvertebral fractures alone (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 for both). Furthermore, they lost more teeth during the follow-up period than did those with no fractures (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and tended to lose more teeth than did those with nonvertebral fractures alone or both prevalent fracture types. We observed no significant difference in the number of teeth lost between the participants with nonvertebral fractures alone and those with no fractures. Postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures may be at a higher risk of tooth loss. © 2023 The Authors. <i>JBMR Plus</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm4.10822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm4.10822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between prevalent fractures and tooth loss in postmenopausal women remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the association between prevalent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, the number of teeth present at baseline, and the number of teeth lost during follow-up in postmenopausal Japanese women. This cross-sectional study enrolled 843 participants (mean age 68.3 years). The number of teeth at follow-up was evaluated in 655 women in this longitudinal study. The participants were divided into four groups according to their prevalent fracture status: no fractures, vertebral fractures alone, nonvertebral fractures alone, and both fracture types. After adjusting for covariates, Poisson regression analyses were performed to investigate differences in the number of teeth at baseline and that lost during the follow-up period among the four groups. Participants with prevalent vertebral fractures alone had significantly fewer teeth at baseline than those in participants without fractures or nonvertebral fractures alone (p < 0.001 for both). Furthermore, they lost more teeth during the follow-up period than did those with no fractures (p = 0.021) and tended to lose more teeth than did those with nonvertebral fractures alone or both prevalent fracture types. We observed no significant difference in the number of teeth lost between the participants with nonvertebral fractures alone and those with no fractures. Postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures may be at a higher risk of tooth loss. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎骨骨折绝经后妇女牙齿脱落风险增加:观察研究
绝经后妇女的普遍骨折与牙齿脱落之间的关系仍不清楚。在此,我们研究了绝经后日本女性中流行性椎体和非椎体骨折、基线时存在的牙齿数量以及随访期间牙齿脱落数量之间的关系。这项横断面研究共招募了 843 名参与者(平均年龄 68.3 岁)。在这项纵向研究中,对 655 名妇女的随访牙齿数量进行了评估。研究人员根据骨折流行状况分为四组:无骨折组、单纯椎体骨折组、单纯非椎体骨折组和两种骨折类型组。在对共变量进行调整后,进行泊松回归分析,以研究四组参与者基线时牙齿数量和随访期间牙齿脱落数量的差异。与没有骨折或仅有非椎体骨折的参试者相比,仅有流行性椎体骨折的参试者基线时的牙齿数量明显较少(两者的p均为0.001)。此外,与无骨折者相比,他们在随访期间脱落的牙齿更多(p = 0.021),而且往往比单纯非椎体骨折者或同时患有两种流行性骨折者脱落的牙齿更多。我们观察到,仅有非椎体骨折的参与者与没有骨折的参与者在牙齿脱落数量上没有明显差异。患有流行性椎体骨折的绝经后妇女可能面临更高的牙齿脱落风险。© 2023 作者。JBMR Plus 由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表美国骨与矿物质研究学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Management of multiple vertebral fractures during lactation in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta type I following twin delivery. Special Collection on Rare Musculoskeletal Diseases 2024. Successful treatment of adult cherubism with a 60 mg denosumab 6-monthly regimen. Unraveling melorheostosis: insights into clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Improvement of bone properties in children with osteogenesis imperfecta after pamidronate: a bone biopsy study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1