Affective neuroscience personality differences between medical school students and engineering school students

Yasemin Hoşgören Alıcı, Jamal Hasanli, Selvi Ceran
{"title":"Affective neuroscience personality differences between medical school students and engineering school students","authors":"Yasemin Hoşgören Alıcı, Jamal Hasanli, Selvi Ceran","doi":"10.32552/2023.actamedica.882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Medical and engineering faculty students both choose their majors from the field of science. But the educational process differs between the two majors. In this study we aimed to investigate the personality traits that might affect this preference. Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) could be particularly useful in studying the traits linked to the affective formation of the individual. Materials and Methods: We prepared an online survey form collecting the sociodemographic and clinical data and the ANPS. We investigated the relationship between affective personality traits determined by the ANPS and the selection of the major. Also, we examined the affective personality traits that may influence the development of psychiatric illness in our sample. Results: 219 medical students and 222 engineering students participated the study. Participants’ ages ranged between 18 and 33 (Median=21; IQR=3). Among participants 60,5% were female, 34,7% has a psychiatric illness, 11,3 % had a chronic illness, and 16,8% has a family history of psychiatric illness. ANPS total and subscale scores weren’t different between the groups. The SADNESS subscale scores were associated with the occurrence of the psychiatric illness. Conclusion: The lack of difference between the two groups may indicate that affective personality profile is not a decisive factor in this choice. Our limitations are the small sample size, the lack of representation of our sample and the scarcity of data about other factors that might affect this preference. SADNESS was associated with psychiatric disorders in both groups.","PeriodicalId":7100,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2023.actamedica.882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Medical and engineering faculty students both choose their majors from the field of science. But the educational process differs between the two majors. In this study we aimed to investigate the personality traits that might affect this preference. Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) could be particularly useful in studying the traits linked to the affective formation of the individual. Materials and Methods: We prepared an online survey form collecting the sociodemographic and clinical data and the ANPS. We investigated the relationship between affective personality traits determined by the ANPS and the selection of the major. Also, we examined the affective personality traits that may influence the development of psychiatric illness in our sample. Results: 219 medical students and 222 engineering students participated the study. Participants’ ages ranged between 18 and 33 (Median=21; IQR=3). Among participants 60,5% were female, 34,7% has a psychiatric illness, 11,3 % had a chronic illness, and 16,8% has a family history of psychiatric illness. ANPS total and subscale scores weren’t different between the groups. The SADNESS subscale scores were associated with the occurrence of the psychiatric illness. Conclusion: The lack of difference between the two groups may indicate that affective personality profile is not a decisive factor in this choice. Our limitations are the small sample size, the lack of representation of our sample and the scarcity of data about other factors that might affect this preference. SADNESS was associated with psychiatric disorders in both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学院学生与工学院学生情感神经科学人格差异研究
目的:医学院和工程系的学生都从科学领域选择专业。但是这两个专业的教育过程是不同的。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查可能影响这种偏好的人格特征。情感神经科学人格量表(ANPS)在研究与个人情感形成相关的特征方面可能特别有用。材料和方法:我们准备了一份在线调查表格,收集了社会人口学和临床资料以及ANPS。我们研究了由ANPS决定的情感人格特征与专业选择之间的关系。此外,我们还检查了可能影响我们样本中精神疾病发展的情感人格特征。结果:219名医学生和222名工科学生参与了本研究。参与者年龄在18到33岁之间(中位数=21;差= 3)。在参与者中,65.5%为女性,34.7%患有精神疾病,11.3%患有慢性疾病,16.8%有精神疾病家族史。各组间ANPS总分和分量表得分无显著差异。悲伤量表得分与精神疾病的发生有关。结论:两组之间的差异不大,可能表明情感人格特征不是这一选择的决定性因素。我们的限制是样本量小,我们的样本缺乏代表性,以及可能影响这种偏好的其他因素的数据稀缺。在两组中,悲伤都与精神疾病有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De-novo use of generic tacrolimus (Adoport) in renal transplant recipients: A single center experience from Türkiye Return to work for cancer survivors: Importance and challenges The biochemical effect correlated with pulmonary dysfunction and complications in obese patients Transcatheter mitral valve therapies: A comprehensive review Eighteen years of the medical scientist training program at Hacettepe University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1