Are NLR, PLR, and Elevated Uric Acid Levels Predictive of Preeclampsia?

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2478/jce-2023-0009
Alina-Georgiana Corduneanu, Mihai Emil Căpîlna
{"title":"Are NLR, PLR, and Elevated Uric Acid Levels Predictive of Preeclampsia?","authors":"Alina-Georgiana Corduneanu, Mihai Emil Căpîlna","doi":"10.2478/jce-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background It is estimated that 2 to 8% of pregnancies are complicated by gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, the latter being considered a major cardiovascular emergency due to its possible progression to severe eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. New inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), may predict the progression of gestational hypertension. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to assess whether NLR, PLR, and uric acid play a role in predicting preeclampsia and its severe forms. Methods This prospective, single-center cohort study, conducted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022, included 107 pregnant women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and its severe forms, HELLP syndrome and eclampsia. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group included 88 patients with gestational hypertension (GH group), and the second group included 19 patients with preeclampsia and its severe forms (PE group). We compared demographic, clinical and biochemistry data between the two groups. Results PLR was significantly lower in women with preeclampsia (85.47 ± 7.91 vs. 115.90 ± 4.63, p = 0.005). The mean serum uric acid level in the PE group was significantly higher than in the GH group (6.71 ± 0.44 mg/dL vs. 4.59 ± 0.12 mg/dL, p <0.0001). Conclusion In this study, low-cost biomarkers PLR and serum uric acid were associated with a higher risk of PE and its severe forms and may be used to predict the progression of gestational hypertension.","PeriodicalId":15210,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background It is estimated that 2 to 8% of pregnancies are complicated by gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, the latter being considered a major cardiovascular emergency due to its possible progression to severe eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. New inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), may predict the progression of gestational hypertension. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to assess whether NLR, PLR, and uric acid play a role in predicting preeclampsia and its severe forms. Methods This prospective, single-center cohort study, conducted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022, included 107 pregnant women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and its severe forms, HELLP syndrome and eclampsia. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group included 88 patients with gestational hypertension (GH group), and the second group included 19 patients with preeclampsia and its severe forms (PE group). We compared demographic, clinical and biochemistry data between the two groups. Results PLR was significantly lower in women with preeclampsia (85.47 ± 7.91 vs. 115.90 ± 4.63, p = 0.005). The mean serum uric acid level in the PE group was significantly higher than in the GH group (6.71 ± 0.44 mg/dL vs. 4.59 ± 0.12 mg/dL, p <0.0001). Conclusion In this study, low-cost biomarkers PLR and serum uric acid were associated with a higher risk of PE and its severe forms and may be used to predict the progression of gestational hypertension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NLR、PLR和尿酸水平升高是否预示子痫前期?
据估计,2 - 8%的妊娠合并妊娠高血压和先兆子痫,后者被认为是一个主要的心血管急症,因为它可能发展为严重子痫和HELLP综合征。新的炎症生物标志物,如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR),可能预测妊娠期高血压的进展。研究目的本研究的目的是评估NLR、PLR和尿酸是否在预测子痫前期及其严重形式中起作用。方法本前瞻性单中心队列研究于2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日进行,纳入107例妊娠期高血压、先兆子痫及其严重形式、HELLP综合征和子痫的孕妇。患者分为两组:第一组为88例妊娠期高血压患者(GH组),第二组为19例先兆子痫及其严重形式患者(PE组)。我们比较了两组患者的人口学、临床和生物化学数据。结果子痫前期妇女的PLR明显低于对照组(85.47±7.91∶115.90±4.63,p = 0.005)。PE组平均血尿酸水平显著高于GH组(6.71±0.44 mg/dL vs. 4.59±0.12 mg/dL, p <0.0001)。结论:低成本生物标志物PLR和血清尿酸与PE及其严重形式的高风险相关,可用于预测妊娠期高血压的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
High Inflammation and Coronary Calcification in an Acute Coronary Syndrome Successfully Treated with Cutting Balloon Highly Inflamed Non-Calcified Coronary Plaques Sealed with Stents in Patients with Zero Calcium Score – a Case Series and Review of the Literature A Race Against Time: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Discovers a Highly Inflamed Plaque in 49-Year-Old Right Before STEMI Bioengineered Small-Diameter Vascular Xenografts as an Alternative to Autologous Vascular Grafting for Emergency Revascularization – a Preliminary Study Regional Differences in the Level of Inflammation Between the Right and Left Coronary Arteries – a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Study of Epicardial Fat Attenuation Index in Four Scenarios of Cardiovascular Emergencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1