Penetrating a market with local‐content and pricing decisions: Implications for a multinational firm in the competition with a local firm

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Naval Research Logistics Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1002/nav.22161
Zhenning Dong, Liping Liang, Nanqin Liu, Mingming Leng
{"title":"Penetrating a market with local‐content and pricing decisions: Implications for a multinational firm in the competition with a local firm","authors":"Zhenning Dong, Liping Liang, Nanqin Liu, Mingming Leng","doi":"10.1002/nav.22161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The internationalization of production requires multinational firms to determine a local content rate for their products made and sold in a foreign country. In this paper, we investigate the impact of a government's local content requirement (LCR) on the local content rate and pricing decisions of a multinational firm who competes with a local firm in a market. In an emerging market, the multinational firm increases his local content rate to comply with an LCR if the LCR involves a moderate threshold and a sufficiently large penalty tariff rate. Although a small penalty tariff rate cannot induce the multinational firm's compliance, a larger penalty tariff leads the firm to adopt a higher local content rate. When the multinational firm complies with the LCR, a higher LCR threshold or penalty tariff rate shifts away the multinational firm's demand and profit but may not benefit the local firm if the two firms' price competition is fiercer than their quality competition. In addition, if the two firms' quality competition is fiercer than their price competition, a large LCR threshold may still not benefit the local firm. In contrast, in a developed market, the multinational firm should increase his local content rate as the quality‐cost tradeoff ratio increases. The LCR plays the same effect on the multinational firm as that in an emerging market, whereas its effect on the local firm still depends on the relative intensity of the two firms' price competition versus quality competition, but under reverse conditions.","PeriodicalId":49772,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The internationalization of production requires multinational firms to determine a local content rate for their products made and sold in a foreign country. In this paper, we investigate the impact of a government's local content requirement (LCR) on the local content rate and pricing decisions of a multinational firm who competes with a local firm in a market. In an emerging market, the multinational firm increases his local content rate to comply with an LCR if the LCR involves a moderate threshold and a sufficiently large penalty tariff rate. Although a small penalty tariff rate cannot induce the multinational firm's compliance, a larger penalty tariff leads the firm to adopt a higher local content rate. When the multinational firm complies with the LCR, a higher LCR threshold or penalty tariff rate shifts away the multinational firm's demand and profit but may not benefit the local firm if the two firms' price competition is fiercer than their quality competition. In addition, if the two firms' quality competition is fiercer than their price competition, a large LCR threshold may still not benefit the local firm. In contrast, in a developed market, the multinational firm should increase his local content rate as the quality‐cost tradeoff ratio increases. The LCR plays the same effect on the multinational firm as that in an emerging market, whereas its effect on the local firm still depends on the relative intensity of the two firms' price competition versus quality competition, but under reverse conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以本地内容和定价决策渗透市场:对跨国公司与本地公司竞争的启示
生产的国际化要求跨国公司为其在国外生产和销售的产品确定一个本地含量率。本文研究了一国政府的本地含量要求(LCR)对跨国公司在市场上与本地企业竞争时的本地含量率和定价决策的影响。在新兴市场中,如果LCR包含适度的门槛和足够大的惩罚性关税税率,跨国公司就会提高其本地含量率以遵守LCR。虽然较低的惩罚性关税税率不能促使跨国公司遵守,但较高的惩罚性关税会导致跨国公司采用较高的本地含量率。当跨国公司遵守LCR时,较高的LCR门槛或惩罚性关税税率会转移跨国公司的需求和利润,但如果两家公司的价格竞争比质量竞争更激烈,则可能不利于当地公司。此外,如果两家公司的质量竞争比价格竞争更激烈,那么较大的LCR门槛可能仍然不利于当地公司。相反,在发达市场,跨国公司应该随着质量-成本权衡比率的增加而提高其本地含量率。LCR对跨国公司的影响与对新兴市场的影响相同,而其对本地公司的影响仍然取决于两家公司价格竞争与质量竞争的相对强度,但在相反的条件下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Naval Research Logistics
Naval Research Logistics 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Submissions that are most appropriate for NRL are papers addressing modeling and analysis of problems motivated by real-world applications; major methodological advances in operations research and applied statistics; and expository or survey pieces of lasting value. Areas represented include (but are not limited to) probability, statistics, simulation, optimization, game theory, quality, scheduling, reliability, maintenance, supply chain, decision analysis, and combat models. Special issues devoted to a single topic are published occasionally, and proposals for special issues are welcomed by the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Partial information sharing in supply chains with ARMA demand Efficient online estimation and remaining useful life prediction based on the inverse Gaussian process Double‐sided queues and their applications to vaccine inventory management Optimal condition‐based parameter learning and mission abort decisions Single machine scheduling with the total weighted late work and rejection cost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1