Muzaffar Aziz, Abdul Hannan Javaid, Muhammad Ayub, Hajra Khan, Umama Hayat Qureshi, Khalid Hussain Qureshi
{"title":"Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Modified Alvarado's Score Vs AIR Score in Acute Appendicitis","authors":"Muzaffar Aziz, Abdul Hannan Javaid, Muhammad Ayub, Hajra Khan, Umama Hayat Qureshi, Khalid Hussain Qureshi","doi":"10.51273/esc23.25131936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MASS Vs AIR score in patients with acute appendicitis taking histopathology as gold standard. Material and Methods: Study design is cross sectional study (Validation). The study took place in the Department of General Surgery Nishtar Hospital Multan form 2nd august 2022 to 1 Feb 2023. The technique used for sampling is Non-Pro-bability consecutive sampling. Sample size is calculated using PASS 11, through formula for paired sensitivities (McNemar test). In total, 148 patients with diagnosis of acutely inflamed appendix, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, after taking informed consent, were enrolled. Baseline data including age, gender, MASS and AIRS was noted. Results: patients were having a mean age of 32.91±9.06 years. There were 97(65.54%) male and 51(34.46%) female. Histopathology showed 114(77.03%) patients had acute appendicitis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV& DAwas 71.05%, 85.29%, 94.18%, 46.77%&74.23% respectively for MASS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV& DAwas 94.49%, 88.23%, 96.49%, 88.23% &94.59% respectively for AIR. Conclusion: AIR score is an improved diagnostic scoring system than MASS for acute appendicitis.AIR is more sensitive and more specific than MASS. In addition, the two scores can be easily computed through a detailed history and clinical exam and basic laboratory tests.","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":"52 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.25131936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MASS Vs AIR score in patients with acute appendicitis taking histopathology as gold standard. Material and Methods: Study design is cross sectional study (Validation). The study took place in the Department of General Surgery Nishtar Hospital Multan form 2nd august 2022 to 1 Feb 2023. The technique used for sampling is Non-Pro-bability consecutive sampling. Sample size is calculated using PASS 11, through formula for paired sensitivities (McNemar test). In total, 148 patients with diagnosis of acutely inflamed appendix, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, after taking informed consent, were enrolled. Baseline data including age, gender, MASS and AIRS was noted. Results: patients were having a mean age of 32.91±9.06 years. There were 97(65.54%) male and 51(34.46%) female. Histopathology showed 114(77.03%) patients had acute appendicitis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV& DAwas 71.05%, 85.29%, 94.18%, 46.77%&74.23% respectively for MASS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV& DAwas 94.49%, 88.23%, 96.49%, 88.23% &94.59% respectively for AIR. Conclusion: AIR score is an improved diagnostic scoring system than MASS for acute appendicitis.AIR is more sensitive and more specific than MASS. In addition, the two scores can be easily computed through a detailed history and clinical exam and basic laboratory tests.
目的:探讨以组织病理学为金标准的MASS Vs AIR评分对急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性。材料与方法:研究设计为横断面研究(验证)。该研究于2022年8月2日至2023年2月1日在木尔坦尼什塔尔医院普通外科进行。采样使用的技术是非亲性连续采样。通过配对灵敏度公式(McNemar检验),使用pas11计算样本量。总共有148名诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者在知情同意后符合纳入标准。基线数据包括年龄、性别、MASS和AIRS。结果:患者平均年龄32.91±9.06岁。男性97例(65.54%),女性51例(34.46%)。组织病理学检查显示急性阑尾炎114例(77.03%)。灵敏度、特异性、PPV、npvv;MASS的dax分别为71.05%、85.29%、94.18%、46.77%和74.23%。灵敏度、特异性、PPV、npvv;AIR分别为94.49%、88.23%、96.49%、88.23%和94.59%。结论:AIR评分是一种较MASS改进的急性阑尾炎诊断评分系统。AIR比MASS更敏感、更特异。此外,通过详细的病史和临床检查以及基本的实验室检查,这两个分数可以很容易地计算出来。