Connectivity, centrality, and adaptation: The coproduction of political space in China’s standardization of autonomous driving technologies

IF 3.2 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Global Media and China Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/20594364231198289
Nicolas Huppenbauer
{"title":"Connectivity, centrality, and adaptation: The coproduction of political space in China’s standardization of autonomous driving technologies","authors":"Nicolas Huppenbauer","doi":"10.1177/20594364231198289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical standards are a topic of intense geopolitical competition. This article introduces standardization as a practice constitutive of meaning and social order, and, in particular, one that coproduces political space. It engages with the argument that China in international standardization aims to make itself more central, and increasingly rejects domestic adaptation, in order to promote a new spatial vision of Sino-centric connectivity for international relations. After situating this argument in the literature on standardization and space-making, the article analyzes China’s policy discourse on the standardization of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles. The analyzed discourse reveals a position towards connectivity that is partially Sino-centric, but also reproduces established narratives of openness, technical expertise, and cooperation. The article adds to the debate on the coproduction of political space by introducing standardization as a site through which connectivity as a geopolitical vision is negotiated. Empirically, it adds to recent findings that China's different national goals for digital infrastructure development may compete with each other, reducing the country's potential to coherently connect with the world on its own terms.","PeriodicalId":42637,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and China","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231198289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technical standards are a topic of intense geopolitical competition. This article introduces standardization as a practice constitutive of meaning and social order, and, in particular, one that coproduces political space. It engages with the argument that China in international standardization aims to make itself more central, and increasingly rejects domestic adaptation, in order to promote a new spatial vision of Sino-centric connectivity for international relations. After situating this argument in the literature on standardization and space-making, the article analyzes China’s policy discourse on the standardization of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles. The analyzed discourse reveals a position towards connectivity that is partially Sino-centric, but also reproduces established narratives of openness, technical expertise, and cooperation. The article adds to the debate on the coproduction of political space by introducing standardization as a site through which connectivity as a geopolitical vision is negotiated. Empirically, it adds to recent findings that China's different national goals for digital infrastructure development may compete with each other, reducing the country's potential to coherently connect with the world on its own terms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连通性、中心性与适应性:中国自动驾驶技术标准化中的政治空间共生
技术标准是一个地缘政治竞争激烈的话题。本文介绍了标准化作为一种构成意义和社会秩序的实践,特别是一种共同产生政治空间的实践。它与中国在国际标准化中的目标是使自己更加核心,并越来越拒绝国内适应的观点相结合,以促进以中国为中心的国际关系连通性的新空间愿景。在将这一论点置于标准化和空间制造的文献中之后,文章分析了中国关于智能网联汽车标准化的政策话语。分析的话语揭示了一种部分以中国为中心的互联互通立场,但也再现了开放、技术专长和合作的既定叙事。这篇文章通过引入标准化作为一个地点,增加了关于政治空间共同生产的辩论,通过标准化,作为地缘政治愿景的连通性得以谈判。从经验上看,它与最近的研究结果相辅相成,即中国在数字基础设施发展方面的不同国家目标可能会相互竞争,从而降低中国以自己的方式与世界紧密联系的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Media and China
Global Media and China COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media Performing fear in television production: Practices of an illiberal democracy Water as elemental medium and heritage: The case of Sangyuanwei Polder embankment system Twitch spouse: Livestreaming and the legacy of spousal labour in the video game industry Remediated memory, digital witnessing and engagement: A qualitative analysis of the interactive documentary ‘The Space We Hold’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1