PO42

Ria Mulherkar, Hong Wang, Mark Jelenik, Hayeon Kim, Christopher J. Houser, Elangovan Doraisamy, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Alexander Olawaiye, John Comerci, Michelle Boisen, Jessica Berger, Joseph Kelley, Paniti Sukumvanich, Sarah Taylor, Robert Edwards, Lan Coffman, Ronald Buckanovich, Jamie Lesnock, Haider Mahdi, Shannon Rush, John Austin Vargo, Sushil Beriwal, Parul Barry
{"title":"PO42","authors":"Ria Mulherkar, Hong Wang, Mark Jelenik, Hayeon Kim, Christopher J. Houser, Elangovan Doraisamy, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Alexander Olawaiye, John Comerci, Michelle Boisen, Jessica Berger, Joseph Kelley, Paniti Sukumvanich, Sarah Taylor, Robert Edwards, Lan Coffman, Ronald Buckanovich, Jamie Lesnock, Haider Mahdi, Shannon Rush, John Austin Vargo, Sushil Beriwal, Parul Barry","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disparities in race and socioeconomic factors affect patient access to cancer screening, treatment, and clinical outcomes. The aim of this project was to evaluate relationship between race and socioeconomic factors including insurance status, employment status, disability status, and distance from brachytherapy center on clinical outcomes including stage at presentation, number of nodes positive, brachytherapy technique, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). All cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy at our institution from 2007-2017 were identified. Race and socioeconomic factors including insurance status, employment status, disability status, and distance from brachytherapy center were recorded. Clinical characteristics including stage at presentation, number of involved nodes, and brachytherapy technique were also recorded. PFS and OS were calculated from date of last brachytherapy fraction, with censorship at date of last follow-up. Correlation was tested between racial and socioeconomic factors and survival outcomes (i.e., PFS and OS) using Cox regression models. Their association with other outcomes was examined with Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients where appropriate. 251 cervical cancer patients were identified, with median follow-up 5.2 years (IQR 2.0-7.7 years). On univariate analysis (UVA), there was no correlation between brachytherapy technique utilized, number of nodes positive, or stage at presentation and race, distance from treatment center, insurance status, employment status, or disability status. UVA did show a significant correlation between PFS and race, insurance status, employment status, and disability status. Significantly worse PFS was seen in non-white group (p=0.036), uninsured group (p<0.001), unemployed group (p<0.001), and disabled group (p=0.041). Similarly, there was significant correlation between OS and race, insurance status, employment status, and disability status. Significantly worse OS was seen in non-white group (p=0.005), uninsured group (p<0.001), unemployed group (p<0.001), and disabled group (p=0.008). On multivariate analysis (MVA), there was no significant correlation between race or disability status and PFS, but there was significantly improved PFS seen in patients with insurance (p < 0.001) and patients who were employed (p = 0.002). MVA showed no correlation between disability status and OS, but significantly worse OS in patients who were non-white (p=0.039) and significantly improved OS in patients with insurance (p<0.001), and patients who were employed (p-0.001). MVA showed no significant correlation between stage and insurance or employment status. MVA showed no significant correlation between histology and employment status; on MVA patients with government insurance were less likely to have squamous histology compared with no insurance (p=0.002). Insurance and employment status are significant predictors of PFS, with significantly improved PFS seen in patients who possess insurance and patients who are employed. White race, insurance, and employment status are significant predictors of OS, with significantly improved OS seen in patients of white race, patients who have insurance, and patients who are employed. There was no correlation between insurance or employment status and stage at presentation.","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities in race and socioeconomic factors affect patient access to cancer screening, treatment, and clinical outcomes. The aim of this project was to evaluate relationship between race and socioeconomic factors including insurance status, employment status, disability status, and distance from brachytherapy center on clinical outcomes including stage at presentation, number of nodes positive, brachytherapy technique, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). All cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy at our institution from 2007-2017 were identified. Race and socioeconomic factors including insurance status, employment status, disability status, and distance from brachytherapy center were recorded. Clinical characteristics including stage at presentation, number of involved nodes, and brachytherapy technique were also recorded. PFS and OS were calculated from date of last brachytherapy fraction, with censorship at date of last follow-up. Correlation was tested between racial and socioeconomic factors and survival outcomes (i.e., PFS and OS) using Cox regression models. Their association with other outcomes was examined with Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients where appropriate. 251 cervical cancer patients were identified, with median follow-up 5.2 years (IQR 2.0-7.7 years). On univariate analysis (UVA), there was no correlation between brachytherapy technique utilized, number of nodes positive, or stage at presentation and race, distance from treatment center, insurance status, employment status, or disability status. UVA did show a significant correlation between PFS and race, insurance status, employment status, and disability status. Significantly worse PFS was seen in non-white group (p=0.036), uninsured group (p<0.001), unemployed group (p<0.001), and disabled group (p=0.041). Similarly, there was significant correlation between OS and race, insurance status, employment status, and disability status. Significantly worse OS was seen in non-white group (p=0.005), uninsured group (p<0.001), unemployed group (p<0.001), and disabled group (p=0.008). On multivariate analysis (MVA), there was no significant correlation between race or disability status and PFS, but there was significantly improved PFS seen in patients with insurance (p < 0.001) and patients who were employed (p = 0.002). MVA showed no correlation between disability status and OS, but significantly worse OS in patients who were non-white (p=0.039) and significantly improved OS in patients with insurance (p<0.001), and patients who were employed (p-0.001). MVA showed no significant correlation between stage and insurance or employment status. MVA showed no significant correlation between histology and employment status; on MVA patients with government insurance were less likely to have squamous histology compared with no insurance (p=0.002). Insurance and employment status are significant predictors of PFS, with significantly improved PFS seen in patients who possess insurance and patients who are employed. White race, insurance, and employment status are significant predictors of OS, with significantly improved OS seen in patients of white race, patients who have insurance, and patients who are employed. There was no correlation between insurance or employment status and stage at presentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PO42
种族和社会经济因素的差异影响患者获得癌症筛查、治疗和临床结果。该项目的目的是评估种族和社会经济因素(包括保险状况、就业状况、残疾状况和距离近距离治疗中心的距离)对临床结果(包括发病阶段、淋巴结阳性数、近距离治疗技术、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS))的关系。我们确定了2007-2017年在我院接受近距离放疗的所有宫颈癌患者。种族和社会经济因素包括保险状况、就业状况、残疾状况和距离近距离治疗中心的距离。临床特征包括发病分期、受累淋巴结数量和近距离治疗技术也被记录下来。PFS和OS从最后一次近距离治疗时间计算,并在最后一次随访时间进行审查。使用Cox回归模型检验种族和社会经济因素与生存结果(即PFS和OS)之间的相关性。在适当的情况下,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验、Fisher精确检验和Spearman秩相关系数来检验它们与其他结果的关联。251例宫颈癌患者,中位随访5.2年(IQR 2.0 ~ 7.7年)。在单变量分析(UVA)中,使用的近距离治疗技术、阳性淋巴结数、发病阶段、种族、离治疗中心的距离、保险状况、就业状况或残疾状况之间没有相关性。UVA确实显示PFS与种族、保险状况、就业状况和残疾状况之间存在显著相关。非白人组(p=0.036)、无保险组(p<0.001)、失业组(p<0.001)和残疾组(p=0.041)的PFS均较差。同样,OS与种族、保险状况、就业状况和残疾状况之间存在显著相关。非白人组(p=0.005)、未参保组(p<0.001)、失业组(p<0.001)、残疾组(p=0.008)的OS均明显差。在多变量分析(MVA)中,种族或残疾状况与PFS之间没有显著相关性,但有保险的患者(p < 0.001)和有工作的患者(p = 0.002)的PFS显著改善。MVA显示残疾状态与OS无相关性,但非白人患者的OS明显恶化(p=0.039),有保险的患者的OS显著改善(p<0.001),就业的患者的OS显著改善(p-0.001)。MVA与阶段、保险或就业状况无显著相关。MVA与就业状况无显著相关性;与没有政府保险的MVA患者相比,有政府保险的MVA患者出现鳞状组织学的可能性更小(p=0.002)。保险和就业状况是PFS的重要预测因素,有保险的患者和有工作的患者PFS显著改善。白人种族、保险和就业状况是OS的重要预测因素,白人种族、有保险的患者和有工作的患者的OS显著改善。保险或就业状况与演讲阶段之间没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From patient to pioneer: The inspiring journey of Dr. Brian Moran. Learning curve and proficiency assessment for gynecological brachytherapy amongst radiation oncology trainees in India: Results from a prospective study. A retrospective study on ruthenium-106 and strontium-90 eye-plaques treatment for retinoblastoma: 16-years clinical experience. The influence of time and implants in high-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Early outcomes following local salvage treatment with MRI-assisted low-dose rate brachytherapy (MARS) for MRI-visible postsurgical bed recurrences and focal intraprostatic recurrences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1