Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Universal Access in the Information Society Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Sedano, Miguel Á. Conde, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lera, Julián Chaparro-Peláez
{"title":"Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios","authors":"Francisco J. Rodríguez-Sedano, Miguel Á. Conde, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lera, Julián Chaparro-Peláez","doi":"10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender.","PeriodicalId":49115,"journal":{"name":"Universal Access in the Information Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Access in the Information Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量触觉反馈在协作机器人场景中的影响
摘要近年来,人类操作者与遥控机器人系统的交互已经得到了很大的改善。影响这种改进的因素之一是增加了力反馈,以补充传统图形用户界面提供的视觉反馈。然而,在孤立和安全的环境中执行任务的这些系统的用户通常是缺乏经验和偶尔的用户。此外,由于应用程序和任务的异质性,没有通用的框架来评估这些系统的可用性,因此,需要新的非特定于领域的可用性评估方法。本研究通过提出一个可用性的度量来解决这个问题,该度量包括五个变量:用户效率、用户有效性、心理工作量、感知有用性和感知易用性。实证分析表明,触觉反馈的集成提高了这些系统对非专业用户的可用性,尽管差异没有统计学意义;此外,结果表明,当触觉反馈增加时,心理工作量更高。分析还揭示了不同性别参与者之间的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universal Access in the Information Society
Universal Access in the Information Society COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) is an international, interdisciplinary refereed journal that solicits original research contributions addressing the accessibility, usability, and, ultimately, acceptability of Information Society Technologies by anyone, anywhere, at anytime, and through any media and device. Universal access refers to the conscious and systematic effort to proactively apply principles, methods and tools of universal design order to develop Information Society Technologies that are accessible and usable by all citizens, including the very young and the elderly and people with different types of disabilities, thus avoiding the need for a posteriori adaptations or specialized design. The journal''s unique focus is on theoretical, methodological, and empirical research, of both technological and non-technological nature, that addresses equitable access and active participation of potentially all citizens in the information society.
期刊最新文献
The usability and user experience of an interactive e-learning platform to empower older adults when using electronic personal health records: an online intervention study Conversational versus graphical user interfaces: the influence of rational decision style when individuals perform decision-making tasks repeatedly Class imbalance in multi-resident activity recognition: an evaluative study on explainability of deep learning approaches Continued usage intention of novice and expert players in social network games Integrating online partial pair programming and socially shared metacognitive regulation for the improvement of students’ learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1