Perceived Barriers to Treating Patients with Disabilities and Complex Health Needs Reported by Oral Health Professionals: A Scoping Review

Xinyuan YANG, Michelle CHOW, Yuti GANDHI, Jennifer NGUYEN, Brian TO, Mathew LIM
{"title":"Perceived Barriers to Treating Patients with Disabilities and Complex Health Needs Reported by Oral Health Professionals: A Scoping Review","authors":"Xinyuan YANG, Michelle CHOW, Yuti GANDHI, Jennifer NGUYEN, Brian TO, Mathew LIM","doi":"10.18103/mra.v11i10.4544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"rest of the population, with being able to find oral health professionals willing to provide treatment often identified as the main barrier. Despite this, our understanding of the barriers that oral health professionals face when treating these patients remains limited. This is crucial to overcoming the challenge of reducing oral health disparities faced by these vulnerable populations. Aim: To provide an overview of barriers reported by oral health professionals in regards to treating patients with disabilities and complex health needs in the published literature. Methods: Primary studies were searched for through PudMed, Ovid and Scopus databases using a search strategy developed by the research team. Articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines and against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Eighteen studies fulfilled the criteria for evaluation, including studies using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. General dentists were most frequently included in the studies, but patient populations were highly variable, with the majority relating to people with disability. The reported barriers could be classified into three main areas: clinician, patient, and environment-related. Conclusion: There are only a small number of studies reporting on barriers perceived by oral health professionals to impact on their ability to treat people with disabilities and complex health needs. While lack of training or experience was a factor underlying many of the reported concerns, studies raised concerns about clinicians being inadequately resourced or supported to provide this care. These are areas the dental profession will need to consider in order to address current oral health disparities experienced by people with disability and special health care needs.","PeriodicalId":18641,"journal":{"name":"Medical Research Archives","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Research Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i10.4544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

rest of the population, with being able to find oral health professionals willing to provide treatment often identified as the main barrier. Despite this, our understanding of the barriers that oral health professionals face when treating these patients remains limited. This is crucial to overcoming the challenge of reducing oral health disparities faced by these vulnerable populations. Aim: To provide an overview of barriers reported by oral health professionals in regards to treating patients with disabilities and complex health needs in the published literature. Methods: Primary studies were searched for through PudMed, Ovid and Scopus databases using a search strategy developed by the research team. Articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines and against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Eighteen studies fulfilled the criteria for evaluation, including studies using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. General dentists were most frequently included in the studies, but patient populations were highly variable, with the majority relating to people with disability. The reported barriers could be classified into three main areas: clinician, patient, and environment-related. Conclusion: There are only a small number of studies reporting on barriers perceived by oral health professionals to impact on their ability to treat people with disabilities and complex health needs. While lack of training or experience was a factor underlying many of the reported concerns, studies raised concerns about clinicians being inadequately resourced or supported to provide this care. These are areas the dental profession will need to consider in order to address current oral health disparities experienced by people with disability and special health care needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔卫生专业人员报告的治疗残疾患者和复杂健康需求的感知障碍:范围审查
对于其他人来说,能否找到愿意提供治疗的口腔卫生专业人员往往被认为是主要障碍。尽管如此,我们对口腔卫生专业人员在治疗这些患者时面临的障碍的理解仍然有限。这对于克服减少这些弱势群体面临的口腔健康差距的挑战至关重要。目的:概述口腔卫生专业人员在治疗残疾患者和复杂健康需求方面所报告的障碍。方法:采用课题组自行制定的检索策略,对PudMed、Ovid和Scopus数据库进行初步研究检索。根据PRISMA指南并对照纳入和排除标准对文章进行筛选。结果:18项研究符合评价标准,包括采用定性和定量方法的研究。普通牙医最常被纳入研究,但患者群体变化很大,大多数与残疾人有关。报告的障碍可分为三个主要领域:临床医生、患者和环境相关。结论:只有少数研究报告了口腔卫生专业人员认为的障碍对他们治疗残疾人和复杂健康需求的能力的影响。虽然缺乏培训或经验是许多报道的担忧背后的一个因素,但研究提出了对临床医生缺乏足够资源或支持来提供这种护理的担忧。这些都是牙科专业人员需要考虑的领域,以便解决目前残疾人和有特殊保健需求的人所经历的口腔健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Worldwide Regional Differences in Obesity, Elderly, and COVID-19 Mortality: Do the Exceptions Prove the Rule? Association of Placental Histology with the Pulsatility Index of Fetal and Uteroplacental Vessels during Pregnancy and with Birthweight Z-Score. Managing Pregnancy and Nursing Affecting African American Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Parenthood. Psychosocial Basis of Human Sufferings and Poverty in Patients with Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. A Pilot Study of Neurobiological Mechanisms of Stress and Cardiovascular Risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1