Hungry for more: early childhood educators’ perspectives on STEM education, teaching and professional development

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Irish Educational Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1080/03323315.2023.2261903
Sandra O’Neill, Córa Gillic, Nicola O’Reilly
{"title":"Hungry for more: early childhood educators’ perspectives on STEM education, teaching and professional development","authors":"Sandra O’Neill, Córa Gillic, Nicola O’Reilly","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2261903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, educational policies and curricula recommend that young children experience STEM learning opportunities within Early Childhood (EC) settings. Despite greater demands placed on EC educators, their opinions on STEM have seldom been sought. This study investigated EC educators’ (1) interest in STEM education (2) opinions about the appropriateness of EC STEM education (3) ratings of their STEM self-efficacy and (4) STEM professional development preferences. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed in the Republic of Ireland, with 198 complete responses received. The respondents, many of whom were highly qualified and experienced educators, reported being interested in STEM and felt it was important, though notably, some believed only for older children. Two-thirds felt their preservice education, which included mathematics (43%); science (30%); technology (17%); and engineering (10%), had not prepared them to support STEM. Knowledge of STEM policy was also limited. Despite this, high levels of STEM confidence were reported. Challenges reported included a lack of resources, support and guidance, and STEM knowledge. 96% of respondents expressed interest in attending EC STEM professional development and a variety of approaches to learning were identified. Implications for policy and practice are suggested.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2261903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasingly, educational policies and curricula recommend that young children experience STEM learning opportunities within Early Childhood (EC) settings. Despite greater demands placed on EC educators, their opinions on STEM have seldom been sought. This study investigated EC educators’ (1) interest in STEM education (2) opinions about the appropriateness of EC STEM education (3) ratings of their STEM self-efficacy and (4) STEM professional development preferences. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed in the Republic of Ireland, with 198 complete responses received. The respondents, many of whom were highly qualified and experienced educators, reported being interested in STEM and felt it was important, though notably, some believed only for older children. Two-thirds felt their preservice education, which included mathematics (43%); science (30%); technology (17%); and engineering (10%), had not prepared them to support STEM. Knowledge of STEM policy was also limited. Despite this, high levels of STEM confidence were reported. Challenges reported included a lack of resources, support and guidance, and STEM knowledge. 96% of respondents expressed interest in attending EC STEM professional development and a variety of approaches to learning were identified. Implications for policy and practice are suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渴望更多:幼儿教育工作者对STEM教育、教学和专业发展的看法
越来越多的教育政策和课程建议幼儿在幼儿(EC)环境中体验STEM学习机会。尽管对教育工作者的要求越来越高,但很少有人征求他们对STEM的意见。本研究调查了教育工作者(1)对STEM教育的兴趣;(2)对STEM教育适当性的看法;(3)对STEM自我效能感的评分;(4)STEM专业发展偏好。在爱尔兰共和国分发了一份匿名在线问卷,收到了198份完整的答复。受访者中有许多是高素质和经验丰富的教育工作者,他们表示对STEM感兴趣,并认为它很重要,尽管值得注意的是,有些人认为只适合年龄较大的孩子。三分之二的人认为他们的职前教育,包括数学(43%);科学(30%);技术(17%);和工程学(10%),他们没有准备好支持STEM。对STEM政策的了解也很有限。尽管如此,据报道,STEM的信心水平很高。报告的挑战包括缺乏资源、支持和指导,以及STEM知识。96%的受访者表示有兴趣参加EC STEM专业发展,并确定了各种学习方法。对政策和实践的启示提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Educational Studies
Irish Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
23.50%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
The characteristic elements of TeachMeet Strengthening wellbeing in schools after COVID-19: a pilot evaluation of an awareness based intervention for children and young people Workaholism in higher education. An exploration of the cognitive, emotional, motivational, and behavioural elements ‘I’ll do it tomorrow’: supporting the engagement of primary pre-service teachers through blended, inquiry-based learning ‘Bearing witness to negativity’: towards just futures of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1