Plant Diversity, Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Stock in an Isolated Tropical Sub Montane Forest in Sri Lanka

B. M. B. Weerakoon, S. P. Nissanka
{"title":"Plant Diversity, Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Stock in an Isolated Tropical Sub Montane Forest in Sri Lanka","authors":"B. M. B. Weerakoon, S. P. Nissanka","doi":"10.4038/tar.v34i4.8669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted at Rilagala conservation forest, Nawalapitiya to assess and compare the plant diversity, above ground biomass and carbon stock in the periphery and interior of an isolated sub montane forest in Sri Lanka. All trees above 5 cm Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) in eleven randomly demarcated 25 m × 25 m plots were recorded. Distance up to 100 m from the forest boundary considered as the periphery (8 plots) and over 200 m as the core (3 plots). A total of 1,583 trees belonging to 29 species were recorded and aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stocks were calculated using allometric equations. The tree diversity of each plot was calculated using the Shannon diversity index (H’). Results were statistically analysed using single factor ANOVA. The species richness and H’ were the highest at the periphery (n=23, H’= 2.55) while the lowest at forest interior (n=11, H’= 1.97). The highest tree density was recorded at periphery (2,992 trees ha-1) and it decreased to 1,408 trees ha-1 towards the core. The average DBH was 8.5 ± 3.33 cm and it increased towards the forest interior (9.7 ± 4.51 cm) from the periphery (7.2 ± 3.74 cm). Estimated aboveground biomass ranged from 63.99 - 108.13 Mg ha-1 with a mean of 82.53 ± 14.39 Mg ha-1. The above ground C stock was estimated from 31.99 - 54.07 Mg ha-1 with a mean of 41.26 ± 7.2 Mg ha-1. However, there was no significant difference between forest periphery and core in variables, except species richness (p<0.05). The study revealed that the diversity and density of trees decreased towards the forest interior and vice versa was recorded for DBH, AGB and carbon stock. The study highlights the importance of conserving isolated tropical sub montane forest patches for carbon sequestration.","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v34i4.8669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted at Rilagala conservation forest, Nawalapitiya to assess and compare the plant diversity, above ground biomass and carbon stock in the periphery and interior of an isolated sub montane forest in Sri Lanka. All trees above 5 cm Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) in eleven randomly demarcated 25 m × 25 m plots were recorded. Distance up to 100 m from the forest boundary considered as the periphery (8 plots) and over 200 m as the core (3 plots). A total of 1,583 trees belonging to 29 species were recorded and aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stocks were calculated using allometric equations. The tree diversity of each plot was calculated using the Shannon diversity index (H’). Results were statistically analysed using single factor ANOVA. The species richness and H’ were the highest at the periphery (n=23, H’= 2.55) while the lowest at forest interior (n=11, H’= 1.97). The highest tree density was recorded at periphery (2,992 trees ha-1) and it decreased to 1,408 trees ha-1 towards the core. The average DBH was 8.5 ± 3.33 cm and it increased towards the forest interior (9.7 ± 4.51 cm) from the periphery (7.2 ± 3.74 cm). Estimated aboveground biomass ranged from 63.99 - 108.13 Mg ha-1 with a mean of 82.53 ± 14.39 Mg ha-1. The above ground C stock was estimated from 31.99 - 54.07 Mg ha-1 with a mean of 41.26 ± 7.2 Mg ha-1. However, there was no significant difference between forest periphery and core in variables, except species richness (p<0.05). The study revealed that the diversity and density of trees decreased towards the forest interior and vice versa was recorded for DBH, AGB and carbon stock. The study highlights the importance of conserving isolated tropical sub montane forest patches for carbon sequestration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡孤立热带亚山地森林的植物多样性、地上生物量和碳储量
本研究在斯里兰卡纳瓦拉皮提亚的Rilagala保护区进行,评估和比较了一个孤立的亚山地森林外围和内部的植物多样性、地上生物量和碳储量。在11个随机划分的25 m × 25 m样地,记录所有胸径大于5 cm的乔木。距离森林边界100米以内为外围(8个地块),距离森林边界200米以上为核心(3个地块)。利用异速生长方程计算了林分29种1583株树木的地上生物量和碳储量。利用Shannon多样性指数(H’)计算各样地的树木多样性。结果采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。物种丰富度和H′在森林外围最高(n=23, H′= 2.55),在森林内部最低(n=11, H′= 1.97)。树密度在外围最高,为2992棵ha-1,向中心降低至1408棵ha-1。平均胸径为8.5±3.33 cm,从林周(7.2±3.74 cm)向林内(9.7±4.51 cm)增加;估算的地上生物量范围为63.99 ~ 108.13 Mg ha-1,平均值为82.53±14.39 Mg ha-1。地上碳储量为31.99 ~ 54.07 Mg ha-1,平均值为41.26±7.2 Mg ha-1。除了物种丰富度(p<0.05)外,森林外围与核心在各变量上均无显著差异。研究表明,林内树木的多样性和密度呈下降趋势,胸径、胸径和碳储量呈相反趋势。这项研究强调了保护孤立的热带亚山地森林对碳封存的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1