Impact of Motorized Tea Harvesters on Tea Yield and Yield Determining Parameters

S. R. W. Pathiranage, M. A. Wijeratne, W. A. J. M. De Costa
{"title":"Impact of Motorized Tea Harvesters on Tea Yield and Yield Determining Parameters","authors":"S. R. W. Pathiranage, M. A. Wijeratne, W. A. J. M. De Costa","doi":"10.4038/tar.v34i4.8672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motorized tea harvesters vary in shoot cutting & collecting mechanisms and reported considerable yield decline in Sri Lanka. In this study, three non-selective harvesters were used to evaluate the impacts of different cutting & collecting mechanisms on tea yield-determining parameters compared to manual harvesting (control). The machines used were battery-operated Forbes & Walker harvester with helically arranged picking arms (BatFW), battery-operated Kawasaki harvester with reciprocating blades (BatKW), and petrol-driven Kawasaki harvester with reciprocating blades (PetKW). Tea yield, coarse leaf content, operational time, shoot compositions, branch girthing, and root starch content were recorded for one year. The motorized harvesters reduced tea yield by nearly 50% compared to the control. The number of machines required (units/ha/day) were 6, 4 and 2 for BatFW, BatKW and PetKW, respectively, as compared to eight manual pluckers and the corresponding land extents covered were 0.17, 0.25 and 0.47 (ha/unit/day), as against 0.13 in manual. Manual harvesting and BatFW consumed comparable higher worker requirements than the others. The average shoot weight and shoot density were the least affected by BatFW. The highest immature (arimbu) shoot removal was by PetKW. The highest dormant shoot accumulation in the plucking table was by BatFW. Reciprocating blades harvested more productively (700 g/cm/day) than picking arms (500 g/cm/day). All machines affected branch girthing and root starch reserves compared to manual harvesting. The mechanical impacts on yield determining parameters viz., immature shoot removal, accumulated dormant shoots, affected yield components, poor branch development, and depleted root starch reserves collectively resulted the tea yield reduction.","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v34i4.8672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motorized tea harvesters vary in shoot cutting & collecting mechanisms and reported considerable yield decline in Sri Lanka. In this study, three non-selective harvesters were used to evaluate the impacts of different cutting & collecting mechanisms on tea yield-determining parameters compared to manual harvesting (control). The machines used were battery-operated Forbes & Walker harvester with helically arranged picking arms (BatFW), battery-operated Kawasaki harvester with reciprocating blades (BatKW), and petrol-driven Kawasaki harvester with reciprocating blades (PetKW). Tea yield, coarse leaf content, operational time, shoot compositions, branch girthing, and root starch content were recorded for one year. The motorized harvesters reduced tea yield by nearly 50% compared to the control. The number of machines required (units/ha/day) were 6, 4 and 2 for BatFW, BatKW and PetKW, respectively, as compared to eight manual pluckers and the corresponding land extents covered were 0.17, 0.25 and 0.47 (ha/unit/day), as against 0.13 in manual. Manual harvesting and BatFW consumed comparable higher worker requirements than the others. The average shoot weight and shoot density were the least affected by BatFW. The highest immature (arimbu) shoot removal was by PetKW. The highest dormant shoot accumulation in the plucking table was by BatFW. Reciprocating blades harvested more productively (700 g/cm/day) than picking arms (500 g/cm/day). All machines affected branch girthing and root starch reserves compared to manual harvesting. The mechanical impacts on yield determining parameters viz., immature shoot removal, accumulated dormant shoots, affected yield components, poor branch development, and depleted root starch reserves collectively resulted the tea yield reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动茶叶收割机对茶叶产量的影响及产量测定参数
电动茶叶收割机在茎部切割方面各不相同。收集机制和斯里兰卡报告的产量大幅下降。在本研究中,使用三种非选择性收割机来评估不同切割方式的影响;与人工采收相比,茶叶产量决定参数的收集机制(对照)。使用的机器是电池驱动的福布斯;带螺旋臂的沃克收割机(BatFW),带往复叶片的电池驱动的川崎收割机(BatKW),以及带往复叶片的汽油驱动的川崎收割机(PetKW)。记录了一年的茶叶产量、粗叶含量、操作时间、茎部组成、分枝周长和根淀粉含量。与对照组相比,电动收割机减少了近50%的茶叶产量。BatFW, BatKW和PetKW所需的机器数量(单位/公顷/天)分别为6台,4台和2台,而手动采摘机为8台,相应的土地面积为0.17,0.25和0.47(公顷/公顷/天),而手动采摘机为0.13。手动采集和BatFW消耗的工人需求比其他方法要高。平均枝重和枝密度受蝙蝠fw的影响最小。PetKW脱除幼嫩芽量最高。采台中休眠芽积累量最高的是BatFW。往复式叶片的收获效率(700克/厘米/天)高于采摘臂(500克/厘米/天)。与人工采收相比,所有的机器都会影响树枝的周长和根系淀粉储量。未成熟芽的去除、休眠芽的积累、产量成分的影响、枝条发育不良和根系淀粉储备的消耗等对产量决定参数的机械影响共同导致了茶叶产量的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1