Nitin Nikamanth Appiah Balaji MS , Cynthia L. Beaulieu PhD , Jennifer Bogner PhD , Xia Ning PhD
{"title":"Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods","authors":"Nitin Nikamanth Appiah Balaji MS , Cynthia L. Beaulieu PhD , Jennifer Bogner PhD , Xia Ning PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the performance of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting outcomes from inpatient rehabilitation for subjects with TBI using a dataset with a large number of predictor variables. Our second objective was to identify top predictive features selected by the ML models for each outcome and to validate the interpretability of the models.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Secondary analysis using computational modeling of relationships between patients, injury and treatment activities and 6 outcomes, applied to the large multi-site, prospective, longitudinal observational dataset collected during the traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Acute inpatient rehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>1946 patients aged 14 years or older, who sustained a severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI, and were admitted to 1 of 9 US inpatient rehabilitation sites between 2008 and 2011 (N=1946).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Rehabilitation length of stay, discharge to home, FIM cognitive and FIM motor at discharge and at 9-months post discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Advanced ML models, specifically gradient boosting tree model, performed consistently better than all other models, including classical linear regression models. Top ranked predictive features were identified for each of the 6 outcome variables. Level of effort, days to rehabilitation admission, age at rehabilitation admission, and advanced mobility activities were the most frequently top ranked predictive features. The highest-ranking predictive feature differed across the specific outcome variable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Identifying patient, injury, and rehabilitation treatment variables that are predictive of better outcomes will contribute to cost-effective care delivery and guide evidence-based clinical practice. ML methods can contribute to these efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000575/pdfft?md5=9ace6d4dfb6d2a43d2b3bbfa36a5e72f&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000575-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the performance of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting outcomes from inpatient rehabilitation for subjects with TBI using a dataset with a large number of predictor variables. Our second objective was to identify top predictive features selected by the ML models for each outcome and to validate the interpretability of the models.
Design
Secondary analysis using computational modeling of relationships between patients, injury and treatment activities and 6 outcomes, applied to the large multi-site, prospective, longitudinal observational dataset collected during the traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation study.
Setting
Acute inpatient rehabilitation.
Participants
1946 patients aged 14 years or older, who sustained a severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI, and were admitted to 1 of 9 US inpatient rehabilitation sites between 2008 and 2011 (N=1946).
Main Outcome Measures
Rehabilitation length of stay, discharge to home, FIM cognitive and FIM motor at discharge and at 9-months post discharge.
Results
Advanced ML models, specifically gradient boosting tree model, performed consistently better than all other models, including classical linear regression models. Top ranked predictive features were identified for each of the 6 outcome variables. Level of effort, days to rehabilitation admission, age at rehabilitation admission, and advanced mobility activities were the most frequently top ranked predictive features. The highest-ranking predictive feature differed across the specific outcome variable.
Conclusions
Identifying patient, injury, and rehabilitation treatment variables that are predictive of better outcomes will contribute to cost-effective care delivery and guide evidence-based clinical practice. ML methods can contribute to these efforts.
目的通过使用具有大量预测变量的数据集,研究机器学习(ML)方法在预测创伤性脑损伤患者住院康复结果方面的性能。我们的第二个目标是确定 ML 模型针对每个结果所选择的最高预测特征,并验证模型的可解释性。设计使用计算模型对患者、损伤和治疗活动与 6 个结果之间的关系进行二次分析,并将其应用于创伤性脑损伤住院康复研究期间收集的大型多站点、前瞻性、纵向观察数据集。主要结果测量康复住院时间、出院回家时间、出院时和出院后 9 个月时的 FIM 认知能力和 FIM 运动能力。结果先进的 ML 模型,特别是梯度提升树模型的表现一直优于所有其他模型,包括经典的线性回归模型。在 6 个结果变量中,每一个都确定了排名靠前的预测特征。努力程度、康复入院天数、康复入院年龄和高级活动能力是排名最高的预测特征。结论确定可预测更好结果的患者、损伤和康复治疗变量将有助于提供具有成本效益的护理并指导循证临床实践。ML 方法可以为这些工作做出贡献。