Institutional Pressure and Eco-innovation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Science Technology and Society Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1177/09717218231201945
Dongyun Zhu, Hailun Zhu, Vincent Ekow Arkorful
{"title":"Institutional Pressure and Eco-innovation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty","authors":"Dongyun Zhu, Hailun Zhu, Vincent Ekow Arkorful","doi":"10.1177/09717218231201945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing environmental difficulties triggered by enterprises’ activities have drawn academics and development experts’ attention to mechanisms to advance growth and development without compromising the environment. Discussions about eco-innovation have become topical as a result, yet there still remains a dearth of understanding on the subject. Eco-innovation emphasises the duality of technological innovation and environmental protection as long-term solutions to the inherent tensions between these goals. Despite this, there has been little research on methods to improve eco-innovation performance, taking into account internal and external factors. Cognizant of the external environment’s dynamics, this study, based on institutional theory, investigates how institutional pressure affects eco-innovation. We used a cross-sectional survey approach to draw data from 155 businesses. Results revealed institutional pressures, that is, normative, mimetic, and coercive, also environmental complexity (EC) has a positive role in promoting eco-innovation. While environmental dynamics was found to have a positive moderating effect on the relationship between normative pressure and eco-innovation, EC was revealed to have a moderating influence on the relationship between mimetic, normative pressure, and eco-innovation. In light of these seminal findings that have received little research attention, we propose policy, theoretical, and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":45432,"journal":{"name":"Science Technology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231201945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing environmental difficulties triggered by enterprises’ activities have drawn academics and development experts’ attention to mechanisms to advance growth and development without compromising the environment. Discussions about eco-innovation have become topical as a result, yet there still remains a dearth of understanding on the subject. Eco-innovation emphasises the duality of technological innovation and environmental protection as long-term solutions to the inherent tensions between these goals. Despite this, there has been little research on methods to improve eco-innovation performance, taking into account internal and external factors. Cognizant of the external environment’s dynamics, this study, based on institutional theory, investigates how institutional pressure affects eco-innovation. We used a cross-sectional survey approach to draw data from 155 businesses. Results revealed institutional pressures, that is, normative, mimetic, and coercive, also environmental complexity (EC) has a positive role in promoting eco-innovation. While environmental dynamics was found to have a positive moderating effect on the relationship between normative pressure and eco-innovation, EC was revealed to have a moderating influence on the relationship between mimetic, normative pressure, and eco-innovation. In light of these seminal findings that have received little research attention, we propose policy, theoretical, and practical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度压力与生态创新:环境不确定性的调节作用
企业活动引发的日益严重的环境问题引起了学术界和发展专家对在不损害环境的情况下促进增长和发展的机制的关注。因此,关于生态创新的讨论已成为热门话题,但对这一主题的理解仍然缺乏。生态创新强调技术创新和环境保护的两重性,作为解决这两个目标之间内在紧张关系的长期解决方案。尽管如此,关于如何兼顾内部和外部因素提高生态创新绩效的研究却很少。认识到外部环境的动态性,本研究以制度理论为基础,探讨制度压力对生态创新的影响。我们采用横断面调查方法从155家企业中获取数据。结果表明,制度压力(规范性压力、模仿压力和强制性压力)和环境复杂性(EC)对生态创新具有积极的促进作用。环境动态对规范压力与生态创新之间的关系具有正向调节作用,而环境动态对模仿压力、规范压力与生态创新之间的关系具有正向调节作用。鉴于这些开创性的发现很少受到研究关注,我们提出了政策、理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Science, Technology and Society is an international journal devoted to the study of science and technology in social context. It focuses on the way in which advances in science and technology influence society and vice versa. It is a peer-reviewed journal that takes an interdisciplinary perspective, encouraging analyses whose approaches are drawn from a variety of disciplines such as history, sociology, philosophy, economics, political science and international relations, science policy involving innovation, foresight studies involving science and technology, technology management, environmental studies, energy studies and gender studies. The journal consciously endeavors to combine scholarly perspectives relevant to academic research and policy issues relating to development. Besides research articles the journal encourages research-based country reports, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Green Innovation Strategies on Firm Internal Operations: Evidence from Human Capital Structure Adjustment A Network Analysis of the Relationship Between Automation and Job Characteristics Innovative Pathways to Social Transformation: Disruptive Maintenance Through Social Impact Start-ups in Kerala Productivity of the Korean Biopharmaceutical Industry: Exploring the Effect of Business Model and Open Innovation Firms for Sustainable Manufacturing: Understanding the Key Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1