Governing Global Spaces: the roles of the European Union and other major powers

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2270616
Sieglinde Gstöhl, Simon Schunz
{"title":"Governing Global Spaces: the roles of the European Union and other major powers","authors":"Sieglinde Gstöhl, Simon Schunz","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2270616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article offers a comparative assessment of the current roles of the European Union (EU) in the governance of the Global Spaces − the atmosphere, the high seas, the poles, outer space, and cyberspace. It does so from a twofold perspective: first, it compares the EU’s capacity to act and roles across the Global Spaces, drawing on actorness and role theory. Second, to contextualize the EU’s roles, it contrasts them with those of the United States, China and Russia. The findings show that the EU is still in the process of calibrating its roles in the governance of most of these Global Spaces. It is primarily a norm defender, which distinguishes its external action from the more competitive approaches of other major powers. The EU’s recent attempt to become more strategic has, for now, led to a gap between its role conception and performance, largely due to its limited actorness.KEYWORDS: ActornessatmospherecyberspaceEuropean UnionGlobal Spaceshigh seasouter spacepolar regionsrole theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"37 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2270616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article offers a comparative assessment of the current roles of the European Union (EU) in the governance of the Global Spaces − the atmosphere, the high seas, the poles, outer space, and cyberspace. It does so from a twofold perspective: first, it compares the EU’s capacity to act and roles across the Global Spaces, drawing on actorness and role theory. Second, to contextualize the EU’s roles, it contrasts them with those of the United States, China and Russia. The findings show that the EU is still in the process of calibrating its roles in the governance of most of these Global Spaces. It is primarily a norm defender, which distinguishes its external action from the more competitive approaches of other major powers. The EU’s recent attempt to become more strategic has, for now, led to a gap between its role conception and performance, largely due to its limited actorness.KEYWORDS: ActornessatmospherecyberspaceEuropean UnionGlobal Spaceshigh seasouter spacepolar regionsrole theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治理全球空间:欧盟和其他大国的角色
摘要本文对欧盟(EU)在全球空间(大气、公海、极地、外层空间和网络空间)治理中的当前角色进行了比较评估。它是从两个角度来做的:首先,它比较了欧盟在全球空间中的行动能力和角色,借鉴了行动者和角色理论。其次,为了将欧盟的角色置于大背景下,本文将其与美国、中国和俄罗斯的角色进行了对比。调查结果表明,欧盟仍在调整其在大多数全球空间治理中的角色。它主要是规范的捍卫者,这使它的对外行动有别于其他大国更具竞争性的做法。欧盟最近试图变得更具战略性,但就目前而言,这导致了其角色概念与表现之间的差距,这主要是由于它的角色有限。关键词:行动者大气网络空间欧盟全球空间高纬度外层空间极区角色理论披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1